Typical 0-60 time for a 991.2 with a tune?
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Typical 0-60 time for a 991.2 with a tune?
I think my tune is weak.
I'm getting 3.55 seconds with fresh Michelin Pilot Sport.
My car is a PDK C2S with OEM sports exhaust and Cobb 1.06 tune. Tires are low mileage Michelin Pilot Sport K3. The run was a regular road surface.
I'm getting 3.55 seconds with fresh Michelin Pilot Sport.
My car is a PDK C2S with OEM sports exhaust and Cobb 1.06 tune. Tires are low mileage Michelin Pilot Sport K3. The run was a regular road surface.
Last edited by BlackBear; 07-09-2024 at 12:08 PM.
#3
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
c2? c4? base, S, or GTS?
regardless, sounds about right to me. lots of factors in 0-60. you'll see as low at 3.0 and as high as over 4 seconds quoted for stock 991.2s.
this one is an apr tune and it says 3.2 or so on their best run ---> https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1175...e-dragy-2.html
regardless, sounds about right to me. lots of factors in 0-60. you'll see as low at 3.0 and as high as over 4 seconds quoted for stock 991.2s.
this one is an apr tune and it says 3.2 or so on their best run ---> https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1175...e-dragy-2.html
#4
Rennlist Member
Also, manual or PDK? I have a manual which I wouldn't trade for a PDK but I'm sure that the PDK shifts faster than me. It says so in the literature too
#5
Rennlist Member
The following users liked this post:
straka (07-09-2024)
#7
Which issue was this? 991.2S is no slouch.
Trending Topics
The following users liked this post:
Viper pilot (07-09-2024)
#9
#10
Pro
Good point re the weak tune - maybe set up so can have more overboost time on the turbos? Swap out injectors for better fuel flow? A completely new, custom exhaust for better flow? Maybe tune for more alcohol?
OK, I'll stop - just kidding :-)
OK, I'll stop - just kidding :-)
#11
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,578
Received 1,039 Likes
on
469 Posts
c2? c4? base, S, or GTS?
regardless, sounds about right to me. lots of factors in 0-60. you'll see as low at 3.0 and as high as over 4 seconds quoted for stock 991.2s.
this one is an apr tune and it says 3.2 or so on their best run ---> https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1175...e-dragy-2.html
regardless, sounds about right to me. lots of factors in 0-60. you'll see as low at 3.0 and as high as over 4 seconds quoted for stock 991.2s.
this one is an apr tune and it says 3.2 or so on their best run ---> https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1175...e-dragy-2.html
Straight line speed bragging rights belong largely to EV's these days (more than just Tesla). Also, we entered into frankly silly acceleration times several years ago.
Did I just say that? Damn....must be getting old. Hang on while I turn down the stereo to park.....damn thing is too loud anyway.
#12
@timothymoffat
AGREE. I think 60-130 times are more representative of the power a car makes, and removes traction/hookup from the equation in most cases.
AGREE. I think 60-130 times are more representative of the power a car makes, and removes traction/hookup from the equation in most cases.
The following users liked this post:
timothymoffat (07-09-2024)
#13
Burning Brakes
#14
Rennlist Member
#15
Surface type?
Surface temperature?
Tire temperature?
Tire pressure?
Air temperature?
Were the intercoolers heat soaked or not?
Oil and coolant temperatures?
Elevation?
How much do you weigh?
Surface temperature?
Tire temperature?
Tire pressure?
Air temperature?
Were the intercoolers heat soaked or not?
Oil and coolant temperatures?
Elevation?
How much do you weigh?