Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 Which one for mods? T or 4S widebody

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2023, 07:20 PM
  #31  
AlexZTuned
Rennlist Member
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 432
Received 219 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pakman996-991.2
Check out Instagram. 911atx is good one. Alex documents his build and has tons of good content. He has a modded 991.2 C4S.
Thanks, I have a base C4 btw. Not having the fancy rear diff doesn’t really matter with AWD - just my personal opinion. I’d be saying otherwise if I was RWD though.

Before I bought the C4, I had my build planned out. I browsed these forums and researched a ton. After seeing many complaining about traction issues with over 500+ HP when tuned, I knew the best solution was AWD.

I came from a tuned C63S Coupe and was tired of spinning the tires at 90 MPH. I’ve gotten all the power slides and drifts out of my system with that AMG - I can’t help but say I absolutely love my built C4.
The following 2 users liked this post by AlexZTuned:
Pakman996-991.2 (02-07-2023), PathfinderGTS (02-08-2023)
Old 02-07-2023, 07:24 PM
  #32  
RichJ_cars
Advanced
 
RichJ_cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Virginia
Posts: 92
Received 66 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
Thanks, I have a base C4 btw. Not having the fancy rear diff doesn’t really matter with AWD - just my personal opinion. I’d be saying otherwise if I was RWD though.

Before I bought the C4, I had my build planned out. I browsed these forums and researched a ton. After seeing many complaining about traction issues with over 500+ HP when tuned, I knew the best solution was AWD.

I came from a tuned C63S Coupe and was tired of spinning the tires at 90 MPH. I’ve gotten all the power slides and drifts out of my system with that AMG - I can’t help but say I absolutely love my built C4.
As someone who has gone into the deep end, do you have a sense of what you would do if the motor let go — how much you’d expect to spend on a rebuild/replacement and what shop to use?
Old 02-08-2023, 01:27 AM
  #33  
AlexZTuned
Rennlist Member
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 432
Received 219 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RichJ_cars
As someone who has gone into the deep end, do you have a sense of what you would do if the motor let go — how much you’d expect to spend on a rebuild/replacement and what shop to use?
I’m only pushing 650 crank HP at 22-23 psi on ethanol so the engine is on the safer side.

Spare engines go for 9-12k depending on mileage. These 9A2 3.0L’s can be built with higher strength rods and can be bored out to as high as 3.8L with larger pistons.

Once you start pushing 800 crank HP and above, then you’re asking to bend a rod. But the PDK clutches will begin to fail before the engine lets go. I wouldn’t go more than 750 torque without setting aside cash for Dodson clutches.

I’m still on a completely stock engine and trans and no problems - knock on wood. At the end of the day, I built a C4 that’s as quick as a 992 Turbo S and I’m still under 6 digits all in. 991:2’s are one of the best bang for your buck cars out there with the ability to literally bolt on turbos, tune it; and double your power.
The following 2 users liked this post by AlexZTuned:
Pakman996-991.2 (02-08-2023), PathfinderGTS (02-08-2023)
Old 02-08-2023, 02:17 AM
  #34  
911dude41
Drifting
 
911dude41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,459
Received 1,219 Likes on 703 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
I’m only pushing 650 crank HP at 22-23 psi on ethanol so the engine is on the safer side.

Spare engines go for 9-12k depending on mileage. These 9A2 3.0L’s can be built with higher strength rods and can be bored out to as high as 3.8L with larger pistons.

Once you start pushing 800 crank HP and above, then you’re asking to bend a rod. But the PDK clutches will begin to fail before the engine lets go. I wouldn’t go more than 750 torque without setting aside cash for Dodson clutches.

I’m still on a completely stock engine and trans and no problems - knock on wood. At the end of the day, I built a C4 that’s as quick as a 992 Turbo S and I’m still under 6 digits all in. 991:2’s are one of the best bang for your buck cars out there with the ability to literally bolt on turbos, tune it; and double your power.
let's see some 0-60, 1/4 mile, 60-130 and 100-150 times. There's a nice thread in the 991 TT section. Would be cool to see how your cars times stack up given the lighter weight and it being 3.0
Old 02-08-2023, 02:42 AM
  #35  
AlexZTuned
Rennlist Member
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 432
Received 219 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911dude41
let's see some 0-60, 1/4 mile, 60-130 and 100-150 times. There's a nice thread in the 991 TT section. Would be cool to see how your cars times stack up given the lighter weight and it being 3.0
(Dragy verified)
0-60: 2.45 seconds (1’ rollout)
60-130: 6.52 seconds
1/4 mile: 10.21 @ 137 mph

These were my stock times for reference:
0-60: 3.5 seconds (1’ rollout)
60-130: 11.66 seconds
1/4 mile: 11.95 @ 115 mph

I have videos of runs on my IG account (they’re in my story highlights). These were done on an unprepped surface on the street.

The following 3 users liked this post by AlexZTuned:
Pakman996-991.2 (02-08-2023), PathfinderGTS (02-08-2023), thesaintusa (02-08-2023)
Old 02-08-2023, 05:43 AM
  #36  
911dude41
Drifting
 
911dude41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,459
Received 1,219 Likes on 703 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
(Dragy verified)
0-60: 2.45 seconds (1’ rollout)
60-130: 6.52 seconds
1/4 mile: 10.21 @ 137 mph

These were my stock times for reference:
0-60: 3.5 seconds (1’ rollout)
60-130: 11.66 seconds
1/4 mile: 11.95 @ 115 mph

I have videos of runs on my IG account (they’re in my story highlights). These were done on an unprepped surface on the street.
Very good times/numbers. Huge improvement over stock. Seems strong down low and up top but missing a little in the mid range? That's a very good trap speed, I would have guessed lower 6's in the 60-130. Either way, very strong and a 5 second improvement is nuts. Are the 3.0 Carreras geared differently from the Turbo?

FWIW my car and basically everyone's car in my area put down tremendously slower times at the track vs street. Track preps are usually crap or non-existent.
Old 02-08-2023, 08:02 AM
  #37  
RichJ_cars
Advanced
 
RichJ_cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Virginia
Posts: 92
Received 66 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
I’m only pushing 650 crank HP at 22-23 psi on ethanol so the engine is on the safer side.

Spare engines go for 9-12k depending on mileage. These 9A2 3.0L’s can be built with higher strength rods and can be bored out to as high as 3.8L with larger pistons.

Once you start pushing 800 crank HP and above, then you’re asking to bend a rod. But the PDK clutches will begin to fail before the engine lets go. I wouldn’t go more than 750 torque without setting aside cash for Dodson clutches.

I’m still on a completely stock engine and trans and no problems - knock on wood. At the end of the day, I built a C4 that’s as quick as a 992 Turbo S and I’m still under 6 digits all in. 991:2’s are one of the best bang for your buck cars out there with the ability to literally bolt on turbos, tune it; and double your power.
I didn't mean to suggest that you were pushing the ragged edge. Do you know the names of shops that do 9A2 engine builds?



Quick Reply: 991.2 Which one for mods? T or 4S widebody



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:00 AM.