Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are there chassis/driving experience difference in different model year of 991.1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2020, 03:01 AM
  #1  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Are there chassis/driving experience difference in different model year of 991.1?

In the market looking for the 991.1 Carrera S for the naturally aspirated experience, seems there are model year of 12, 13, 14, 15.

Wondering if there are any driving difference, or any specific year or model to avoid? Thanks!
Old 07-07-2020, 08:20 AM
  #2  
Bud Taylor
Drifting
 
Bud Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,251
Received 430 Likes on 307 Posts
Default 12 and 13

The 12 and 13 dont have rev match (which I prefer). There were cov failures on some cars but these are just cheap plastic valves. The early cars have not surfaced any inherent specific flaws. They all have a design flaw on the door panels but a dude in florida named pedro can fix them permanently for reasonable. 3.8 is the one to have.
The following 2 users liked this post by Bud Taylor:
Btcing (07-11-2020), Pavegeno928 (07-08-2020)
Old 07-07-2020, 09:34 AM
  #3  
D1coach
Racer
 
D1coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 438
Received 162 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Btcing
In the market looking for the 991.1 Carrera S for the naturally aspirated experience, seems there are model year of 12, 13, 14, 15.

Wondering if there are any driving difference, or any specific year or model to avoid? Thanks!
Model year 2016 is also 991.1, at least in the U.S.
Old 07-07-2020, 11:30 AM
  #4  
garfunkle
Banned
 
garfunkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,348
Received 1,149 Likes on 630 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bud Taylor
The 12 and 13 dont have rev match (which I prefer). There were cov failures on some cars but these are just cheap plastic valves. The early cars have not surfaced any inherent specific flaws. They all have a design flaw on the door panels but a dude in florida named pedro can fix them permanently for reasonable. 3.8 is the one to have.
link to Pedro?
Old 07-07-2020, 11:34 AM
  #5  
JW911
Three Wheelin'
 
JW911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 352 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Full leather interior avoids the door panel issue and looks and feels amazing.
The following 2 users liked this post by JW911:
Explorer16 (07-07-2020), Pavegeno928 (07-08-2020)
Old 07-07-2020, 12:41 PM
  #6  
rnl
Burning Brakes
 
rnl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Glenmoore, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,192
Received 454 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JW911
Full leather interior avoids the door panel issue and looks and feels amazing.
991.1 2012 C2 with full leather. Amazing car Still amazing after 95k miles.
The following users liked this post:
Explorer16 (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020, 12:47 PM
  #7  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bud Taylor
The 12 and 13 dont have rev match (which I prefer). There were cov failures on some cars but these are just cheap plastic valves. The early cars have not surfaced any inherent specific flaws. They all have a design flaw on the door panels but a dude in florida named pedro can fix them permanently for reasonable. 3.8 is the one to have.
Thanks! I'm planning on the PDK models so seems rev matching is not the thing I need to worry about

I have vague impressions on have read somewhere that 14+ models have some steering/chasis update, seems it is not true.

Yep love the sound of the 3.8 - especially with the PE or Akrapovic!
Old 07-07-2020, 12:49 PM
  #8  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by D1coach
Model year 2016 is also 991.1, at least in the U.S.
​​​​

Gotcha👌 I'm actually trying to cop one at China. Seems the naming stops at 2015 for 911.1

It costs $100k+ to get a ~2013 C2S with ~30k miles here..
Old 07-07-2020, 12:52 PM
  #9  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JW911
Full leather interior avoids the door panel issue and looks and feels amazing.
👍 Will look into this option
Old 07-07-2020, 12:53 PM
  #10  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rnl
991.1 2012 C2 with full leather. Amazing car Still amazing after 95k miles.
Seems the NA engines are running strong on high miles! Planned to run this car as a daily & driving around the country
Old 07-07-2020, 03:59 PM
  #11  
desmotesta
Rennlist Member
 
desmotesta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 3,070
Received 1,991 Likes on 947 Posts
Default

I have said this before and will repeat..

there IS a huge difference in chassis/drive and feel of a 991.1 C2S and 991.1 GTS.
I moved from a 25K mile garage queen '12 991.1S with S-PASM to a 20K mile 991.1 GTS and they drive/feel very differently.

There is TONS more steering feel and feedback, the rear is far more planted and medium to high speed corner stability is noticeably better in the GTS.

Also have driven the 991.1 Base and 991,1 without S-PASM.. and I would strongly suggest you search for a C2S with the S-PASM , lower ride height looks amazing on these cars, unless you want to deal with the hassle and expense of installing coilovers at a later time

good luck
Old 07-07-2020, 04:48 PM
  #12  
rnl
Burning Brakes
 
rnl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Glenmoore, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,192
Received 454 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Btcing
Seems the NA engines are running strong on high miles! Planned to run this car as a daily & driving around the country
depends on what you plan to do with the car. I'm a 66 year old geezer and purchased the car new as an early 60th birthday present for me. it's my daily driver and I'll never track it. It's plenty powerful for the road and highway. Actually the only place where I open it up is on turnpike on ramps...

the base 991 is - from what I understand - the model of choice in Germany where hp is taxed.
Old 07-08-2020, 04:44 AM
  #13  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by desmotesta
I have said this before and will repeat..

there IS a huge difference in chassis/drive and feel of a 991.1 C2S and 991.1 GTS.
I moved from a 25K mile garage queen '12 991.1S with S-PASM to a 20K mile 991.1 GTS and they drive/feel very differently.

There is TONS more steering feel and feedback, the rear is far more planted and medium to high speed corner stability is noticeably better in the GTS.

Also have driven the 991.1 Base and 991,1 without S-PASM.. and I would strongly suggest you search for a C2S with the S-PASM , lower ride height looks amazing on these cars, unless you want to deal with the hassle and expense of installing coilovers at a later time

good luck
Thanks & good point!

Unfortunately 991.1 GTS is very hard to find in China, also that will be another 20k or 30k above the already $100k+ C2S.. So may need some luck to pull the trigger
Old 07-08-2020, 04:48 AM
  #14  
Btcing
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Btcing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rnl
depends on what you plan to do with the car. I'm a 66 year old geezer and purchased the car new as an early 60th birthday present for me. it's my daily driver and I'll never track it. It's plenty powerful for the road and highway. Actually the only place where I open it up is on turnpike on ramps...

the base 991 is - from what I understand - the model of choice in Germany where hp is taxed.
This car is actually planned as an early 30th birthday present for me

Test drove a C4 911.1, felt like still want more power cause I'm coming from a ~400hp tuned car hehe.

But indeed once we hit the high rev range, C2/C4 is quite strong and the sound is amazing. Love this characteristic of NA cars so much!
Old 07-08-2020, 08:22 AM
  #15  
garfunkle
Banned
 
garfunkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,348
Received 1,149 Likes on 630 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by desmotesta
I have said this before and will repeat..

there IS a huge difference in chassis/drive and feel of a 991.1 C2S and 991.1 GTS.
I moved from a 25K mile garage queen '12 991.1S with S-PASM to a 20K mile 991.1 GTS and they drive/feel very differently.

There is TONS more steering feel and feedback, the rear is far more planted and medium to high speed corner stability is noticeably better in the GTS.

Also have driven the 991.1 Base and 991,1 without S-PASM.. and I would strongly suggest you search for a C2S with the S-PASM , lower ride height looks amazing on these cars, unless you want to deal with the hassle and expense of installing coilovers at a later time

good luck
Lot of unknowns here.... tires for example make a huge difference. The sound of a GTS with the plenum and exhaust note have a substantial placebo affect.


Quick Reply: Are there chassis/driving experience difference in different model year of 991.1?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:09 PM.