Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Depreciation between 2 cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2019, 12:42 PM
  #1  
Bill_76
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Bill_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 683
Received 546 Likes on 245 Posts
Default Depreciation between 2 cars

What car do you think will have more depreciation in the next 2/3 years:

2018 911 991.2 GTS

or

2015 911 991.1 Turbo S

I think the GTS, the Turbo maybe got the worst one on the first years.
Old 01-18-2019, 12:45 PM
  #2  
jnkirk1974
Rennlist Member
 
jnkirk1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 388
Received 276 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

I'm no expert, but since the Turbo S is a bit older, it has likely already taken more of its initial hit in value. So, it's probably a safer buy, in terms of depreciation.
The GTS is a 2018, so its falloff is probably just now being realized.
Old 01-18-2019, 01:19 PM
  #3  
bosco42
Rennlist Member
 
bosco42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Agree with the above but that doesn't necessarily make it the car to purchase.
Lot's of other factors involved in that decision.
Old 01-18-2019, 02:26 PM
  #4  
CSK 911 C4S
Rennlist Member
 
CSK 911 C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 3,817
Received 857 Likes on 432 Posts
Default

Really.

Drive and enjoy.
Old 01-18-2019, 03:14 PM
  #5  
tstafford
Race Car
 
tstafford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,483
Received 1,087 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CSK 911 C4S
Really.

Drive and enjoy.
Agreed.

The best deal will be the car you enjoy more.
Old 01-18-2019, 03:58 PM
  #6  
jkfuel
Racer
 
jkfuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: TX
Posts: 377
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Depreciate less? Probably the Turbo- it's now a "4yo" car.
Old 01-18-2019, 06:04 PM
  #7  
3Series
Three Wheelin'
 
3Series's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CSK 911 C4S
Really.

Drive and enjoy.
Originally Posted by tstafford
Agreed.

The best deal will be the car you enjoy more.

If you have nothing good to say........

With that said, I'm also in the buy what you like, what you want camp. However whenever you are comparing substitute goods, the economics can be a contributor to what you enjoy more. These are two closely related goods, just like all 9,000 variants of the 911.

I'd go Turbo in this case if you really like both cars and you want to maximize your dollar.
Old 01-18-2019, 06:06 PM
  #8  
wareaglescott
Burning Brakes
 
wareaglescott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,184
Received 101 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bosco42
Agree with the above but that doesn't necessarily make it the car to purchase.
Lot's of other factors involved in that decision.
Had to quote this so I could read it in my own post because I was to distracted by the profile pic in the original post to comprehend words!
Old 01-18-2019, 06:20 PM
  #9  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,406
Received 708 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jkfuel
Depreciate less? Probably the Turbo- it's now a "4yo" car.
^ this.

However, I would rather have a new GTS than a 4 year old Turbo. Tough call, both would be a blast, but that is where I put my money. YMMV.
Old 01-18-2019, 06:39 PM
  #10  
carrera4esq
Instructor
 
carrera4esq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 157
Received 38 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I imagine you are trying to hypothetically decide between the two beautiful vehicles.
I actually contemplated the very same scenario. I do not track my cars and my "extra" car gets driven less tha 2k miles per year (work too many hours).
After evaluating all the cars within my $150k maximum budget, it came down to the following: Acura nsx- too many issues, bad reported dealer support, unknown cost of hybrid maintenance going forward; Maclaren mc12 - too expensive once out of warranty and can only be serviced at Maclaren; Ferrari f430 - too raw for my needs, generally no warranty; Audi R8 - design somewhat dated at this time, and there are better more updated alternatives.
At the end of the day, it came down to either the 991.1 Turbo S or 991.2 GTS Targa.
The 991.2 GTS Targa -I like the look of the targa better (my first pcar was a 964 targa); I love the targa roof option; the 991.2 upgrades are substantial, I am a fan of the Alcantara, and the factory warranty is longer. Being newer, however, obviously more depreciation to absorbed by me.
The 991.1 Turbo S - car is faster, love the side scoops and rear spoiler, pccb's standard, more depreciation absorbed by previous owner(s). Definitely seems like the "better deal" as a percentage off original sticker price.
As far as depreciation goes, the deprecation hit declines over time as these cars always eventually find a floor. Keeping in mind that I plan on keeping the car at least 5 years (warranty expiration), I decided on the GTS Targa. I just think it is a more unique and beautiful car. Personal decision, can't go wrong with either.
Old 01-18-2019, 06:54 PM
  #11  
dkhm3
Racer
 
dkhm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orange County
Posts: 435
Received 79 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

depreciation matters less the longer you own it. so if you plan on a short term ownership you should get the turbo.
I find that if I get the car I liked and loved the first time, I tend to be happier throughout the ownership (barring any warranty or reliability problems) and I keep the car longer, therefore having to pay less in the long term switching out vehicles (CA taxes, registration, etc).

Cars keep getting faster and "better" so there is no end. I'd go for the long game.
Old 01-18-2019, 10:05 PM
  #12  
BlueNorther
Pro
 
BlueNorther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Vermont
Posts: 606
Received 153 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

If you are interested in a manual transmission, or rear wheel drive, then you have your answer. Would be far more important than depreciation to me.
Old 01-18-2019, 10:18 PM
  #13  
dkhm3
Racer
 
dkhm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orange County
Posts: 435
Received 79 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueNorther
If you are interested in a manual transmission, or rear wheel drive, then you have your answer. Would be far more important than depreciation to me.
isn't any manual transmission p car depreciate even less than pdk versions? throw that into the mix lol.
i think turbo is all pdk so i guess get a manual if you want to minimize depreciation
Old 01-18-2019, 11:48 PM
  #14  
Bob Z.
Rennlist Member
 
Bob Z.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marineland FL
Posts: 12,536
Likes: 0
Received 3,460 Likes on 2,361 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3Series
If you have nothing good to say........

With that said, I'm also in the buy what you like, what you want camp. However whenever you are comparing substitute goods, the economics can be a contributor to what you enjoy more. These are two closely related goods, just like all 9,000 variants of the 911.

I'd go Turbo in this case if you really like both cars and you want to maximize your dollar.
No are not comparing apples to apples so they are not "substitue goods", whatever the hell that means. You need a little bit thicker skin here...light'en up. Even if you don't like the answer, get the one you like better after driving them and the depreciation difference is negligible; however, it depends on how long you keep it and no one knows that but you.
Old 01-18-2019, 11:55 PM
  #15  
Bill_76
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Bill_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 683
Received 546 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Thank you all for your opinions!!


Quick Reply: Depreciation between 2 cars



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:04 PM.