Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New 911 Carrera T: a completely pointless marketing exercise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2017, 09:10 PM
  #16  
4pipes
Rennlist Member
 
4pipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 581
Received 29 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I’d buy it if I didn’t have the S already.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:11 PM
  #17  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Outside of the GT models, Porsche is really striking out lately.

Marketing over substance. Although, guys are seeing through the marketing and showing in their sales.

Give buyers what they want over what you think you can get them to buy.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:13 PM
  #18  
GiuseppeM
Three Wheelin'
 
GiuseppeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,448
Received 87 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Other than not making any sense (and not getting any credit back) how can they offer Radio Delete in the US if rear camera is mandatory next year?
Old 10-22-2017, 09:16 PM
  #19  
Al.Fresco
Three Wheelin'
 
Al.Fresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,852
Received 327 Likes on 187 Posts
Default

If I buy it, can I add an "urbo" to the badging???
Old 10-22-2017, 09:16 PM
  #20  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,094
Received 2,141 Likes on 981 Posts
Default

Ok....after reading more....I am interested and take back my yawn comment.

This sounds pretty cool:

"shorter transmission ratios from the manual gearbox and rear-wheel drive with mechanical rear differential lock for an enhanced performance and intense driving pleasure."

" also boasts several other equipment features that are not available for the 911 Carrera, including the PASM sports chassis as standard, lowered by 20 mm, the weight-optimised Sport Chrono Package, a shortened shift lever with red shift pattern and Sport-Tex seat centres. The rear-axle steering, which is not available for the 911 Carrera, is available as an option for the 911 Carrera T."
Old 10-22-2017, 09:19 PM
  #21  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
Ok....after reading more....I am interested and take back my yawn comment.

This sounds pretty cool:

" also boasts several other equipment features that are not available for the 911 Carrera, including the PASM sports chassis as standard, lowered by 20 mm, the weight-optimised Sport Chrono Package, a shortened shift lever with red shift pattern and Sport-Tex seat centres. The rear-axle steering, which is not available for the 911 Carrera, is available as an option for the 911 Carrera T."

Except it has the wrong kind of engine in it

This model is the Costco version of the R and GT3 Touring model.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:20 PM
  #22  
GiuseppeM
Three Wheelin'
 
GiuseppeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,448
Received 87 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Except it has the wrong kind of engine in it
^ I thought the same thing
Old 10-22-2017, 09:23 PM
  #23  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GiuseppeM
^ I thought the same thing

Yeah, why not do a naturally aspirated engine in a model like this? Would be a GREAT idea and nice alternative.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:25 PM
  #24  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,094
Received 2,141 Likes on 981 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Except it has the wrong kind of engine in it

This model is the Costco version of the R and GT3 Touring model.
I agree with this point but I think Turbos are here to stay....but I would MUCH rather have the NA engine sound. Porsche has to keep their mpg/emissions for their fleet low and NAs are not doing it. In 10 years we will be begging for the Turbos to come back as the hybrids and EVs come rolling off the Zuffenhausen production line.

It also has the Costco price......
Old 10-22-2017, 09:26 PM
  #25  
GiuseppeM
Three Wheelin'
 
GiuseppeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,448
Received 87 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Yeah, why not do a naturally aspirated engine in a model like this? Would be a GREAT idea and nice alternative.
It sucks, it’s because of CO2 emissions regulations
Old 10-22-2017, 09:29 PM
  #26  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GiuseppeM
It sucks, itÂ’s because of CO2 emissions regulations

I’m not buying it. Look at all the other models that can carry that weight. Like the new Carrera is that much better.

What it comes down to, is MARKETING and catering to the Asian markets and the Euros who think the sky is falling and will have us riding horses and buggies if they could.

Best thing we can do is put our $$$$ where our mouth is.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:30 PM
  #27  
Lapis
Burning Brakes
 
Lapis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Ok. After reading I gotta say, sounds like the best version of the regular (non-GT) 911 range....

LWB bucket seats (unavailable on anything other than a GT car otherwise), manual trans w/shorter throws, SPASM suspension lower 20mm, mechanical rear diff, and some nice cosmetic bits especially on interior that would otherwise only be doable at high cost with Exclusive. cool.

Put another way, this is what the base 911 should have always been. Despite less power, with a manual, buckets, SPASM and rear diff, this will probably be the most entertaining 911 short of a GT3 to wind out and run through some of your favorite twisty roads. Too bad they couldn’t just toss in the old NA engine from the 991.1 GTS!

Still, though, the naming confuses it with the GT3 Touring.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:37 PM
  #28  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

So the reasons for a #2 car are engine and infotainment. Infotainment is gone and this is meant to be a lightweight drivers car that is laughably any lighter and has the less of a drivers engine. Got it. Would rather have a base 991.1 which is lighter btw.
Old 10-22-2017, 09:38 PM
  #29  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Al.Fresco
If I buy it, can I add an "urbo" to the badging???
Only if you don't re center it!
Old 10-22-2017, 09:39 PM
  #30  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Agree ....

Easier to go on a couple month diet for most guys here. I could stand to lose 11lbs myself. Starting tomorrow.
Still heavier than a #1 car...


Quick Reply: New 911 Carrera T: a completely pointless marketing exercise



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:22 AM.