.2GT3 VS .2GTS vid
#61
23.7 minus 18.2= 5.5 much closer to 6 seconds difference that I quoted than the 4 seconds you did, no?
#62
I didn't have the numbers in front of me - it was my recollection thats why I used the symbol for approximately. You now have the numbers to 1/10s (from the video logs).
The point being the GTS performance is right up there with the best of the best and it has 4 seats, can have a sun roof and ventilated seats.
The point being the GTS performance is right up there with the best of the best and it has 4 seats, can have a sun roof and ventilated seats.
#63
I didn't have the numbers in front of me - it was my recollection thats why I used the symbol for approximately. You now have the numbers to 1/10s (from the video logs).
The point being the GTS performance is right up there with the best of the best and it has 4 seats, can have a sun roof and ventilated seats.
The point being the GTS performance is right up there with the best of the best and it has 4 seats, can have a sun roof and ventilated seats.
But seriously sunroof and ventilated seats?? Back seat is a big plus
#64
Yup, might as well have the performance and a few creature comforts
#65
This has quickly become the worst topic on rennlist.
Sticky you seem particularly ridiculous taking the first opportunity to inflame the board with comments that insult half of the people's cars on this board. When these cars cost as much as they do nobody appreciates that kind of unsolicited shade tossed their way.
I've been clear about my preferences, but damn I was super close to buying a .2 GTS. I love them all.
And I'm pretty sure to 99% of collectors out there, a well kept 930, 911R, or long nose is a better car than all of these 991's and all are measurably slower. Give it 10 years and I bet these 991's will be worth half of their MSRP while all these other cars will appreciate. Where do your values lie? I can promise the guy with a pristine 930 will laugh at you for saying your car is faster than his. He doesn't care and he'll laugh all the way to the bank.
yes your .2 is faster than every .1 on the board. Who cares? You don't know speed until you've ridden a super bike on the track anyway.
You like what you like, others like what they do, please don't take every opportunity available to make every topic a childish pissing contest. Go back to page 1 and see your very first comment if your curious about this.
Sticky you seem particularly ridiculous taking the first opportunity to inflame the board with comments that insult half of the people's cars on this board. When these cars cost as much as they do nobody appreciates that kind of unsolicited shade tossed their way.
I've been clear about my preferences, but damn I was super close to buying a .2 GTS. I love them all.
And I'm pretty sure to 99% of collectors out there, a well kept 930, 911R, or long nose is a better car than all of these 991's and all are measurably slower. Give it 10 years and I bet these 991's will be worth half of their MSRP while all these other cars will appreciate. Where do your values lie? I can promise the guy with a pristine 930 will laugh at you for saying your car is faster than his. He doesn't care and he'll laugh all the way to the bank.
yes your .2 is faster than every .1 on the board. Who cares? You don't know speed until you've ridden a super bike on the track anyway.
You like what you like, others like what they do, please don't take every opportunity available to make every topic a childish pissing contest. Go back to page 1 and see your very first comment if your curious about this.
#66
I see you can't refute anything I posted or quoted. The childish move is to devolve to insults and ignore the argument.
It's ok to admit you were wrong. You know, like an adult?
#67
This has quickly become the worst topic on rennlist.
Sticky you seem particularly ridiculous taking the first opportunity to inflame the board with comments that insult half of the people's cars on this board. When these cars cost as much as they do nobody appreciates that kind of unsolicited shade tossed their way.
I've been clear about my preferences, but damn I was super close to buying a .2 GTS. I love them all.
And I'm pretty sure to 99% of collectors out there, a well kept 930, 911R, or long nose is a better car than all of these 991's and all are measurably slower. Give it 10 years and I bet these 991's will be worth half of their MSRP while all these other cars will appreciate. Where do your values lie? I can promise the guy with a pristine 930 will laugh at you for saying your car is faster than his. He doesn't care and he'll laugh all the way to the bank.
yes your .2 is faster than every .1 on the board. Who cares? You don't know speed until you've ridden a super bike on the track anyway.
You like what you like, others like what they do, please don't take every opportunity available to make every topic a childish pissing contest. Go back to page 1 and see your very first comment if your curious about this.
Sticky you seem particularly ridiculous taking the first opportunity to inflame the board with comments that insult half of the people's cars on this board. When these cars cost as much as they do nobody appreciates that kind of unsolicited shade tossed their way.
I've been clear about my preferences, but damn I was super close to buying a .2 GTS. I love them all.
And I'm pretty sure to 99% of collectors out there, a well kept 930, 911R, or long nose is a better car than all of these 991's and all are measurably slower. Give it 10 years and I bet these 991's will be worth half of their MSRP while all these other cars will appreciate. Where do your values lie? I can promise the guy with a pristine 930 will laugh at you for saying your car is faster than his. He doesn't care and he'll laugh all the way to the bank.
yes your .2 is faster than every .1 on the board. Who cares? You don't know speed until you've ridden a super bike on the track anyway.
You like what you like, others like what they do, please don't take every opportunity available to make every topic a childish pissing contest. Go back to page 1 and see your very first comment if your curious about this.
The very topic of this thread is turbo vs. naturally aspirated Porsche performance. I'm oh so sorry if it supports my position and exposes others.
If you don't like the acceleration comparison topic then don't read it. I love it.
#68
I didn't have the numbers in front of me - it was my recollection thats why I used the symbol for approximately. You now have the numbers to 1/10s (from the video logs).
The point being the GTS performance is right up there with the best of the best and it has 4 seats, can have a sun roof and ventilated seats.
The point being the GTS performance is right up there with the best of the best and it has 4 seats, can have a sun roof and ventilated seats.
#69
Sticky I won't respond to you any further but will clarify that my comment calls into question your lack of maturity and tact. The whole topic went downhill the second you got involved.
#71
Seriously dude, didn't you say you were a big proponent of NA cars and then proceeded to say you had a e46 and currently own a e92 M3? What does that mean? You own a supercharged M3? That is ok, we both know what you are doing here, it is pretty clear who is the adult here, probably not the one racing with strangers at traffic lights
#72
I would expect the 991.2 GT3 to be faster around the ring - its Porsches current best effort at a road going track capable car shod with MPSC2 N1 tires. Keep in mind the difference around Hockenheim Kurs was 0.1s.
Yup, might as well have the performance and a few creature comforts
Yup, might as well have the performance and a few creature comforts
#73
Regardless, I'm very happy about this video and topic.
#74
...and this is exactly how things went with him on the BMW sites, wonder why he gets banned. Sad part is he does not even realize it
#75
Both fantastic cars