Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How 'special' is the new GT2RS engine really?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2017, 12:07 PM
  #76  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 705 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
Pete, the peak longitudinal force exerted to the tire on a car like yours with the Cup engine torque, is around 0.55G in second gear.
Actually it's significantly better than that. I need to run but I wanted to leave this here- this is an early data slice from an autocross, mostly 2nd gear (brake bias was off so those Gs as limited). Second gear is relatively short but it's very effective...
Old 07-11-2017, 12:27 PM
  #77  
randr
Banned
 
randr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
Will I rise to the bait when someone says "my xx has zero lag"? Yep. I'm an engineer, one of my many faults.
Turbo lag is indeed real and is measurable

I'm also an engineer - its one of my faults too well played. I'm pretty sure we understand one another and our different perspectives Cheers.
Old 07-11-2017, 12:34 PM
  #78  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
do street turbos still have lag? Yes. Enough to matter?

Will I rise to the bait when someone says "my xx has zero lag"? Yep. I'm an engineer, one of my many faults.
Whilst I do of course agree that turbo on off throttle response can never be like a N/A one I would like to state that if you sat in my 2017 turbo S and I floored the throttle at 1000rpm in say third gear and I shielded the boost gauge you would not be able to discern from your buttometer when the engine went from atmo to positive boost pressure on the gauge - this is what I describe as zero lag.
Moreover when the settings are in nutter mode with the anti lag system active (keeps the throttle open during on off throttle) the boost is pretty much instant, not linear enough for the sub 2 foot adjustability but that will always be the domain of a N/A motor IMO.
Old 07-11-2017, 12:47 PM
  #79  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,485
Received 437 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

it s actually the opposite
There s no turbo lag with dual clutch trasmission that can be a loss of control feeling in some circumstancies
Old 07-11-2017, 12:55 PM
  #80  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,450
Received 171 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
Actually it's significantly better than that. I need to run but I wanted to leave this here- this is an early data slice from an autocross, mostly 2nd gear (brake bias was off so those Gs as limited). Second gear is relatively short but it's very effective...
Pete it could well be, and it looks from this graph that it definitely is, I don't doubt it, quite a jewel you have I don't know the specifications so I used a 964RS with 997 Cup engine and a 4 gear gearbox on 16" tires. Close to 1.5G lateral on narrow tires, you must be on full slicks!

- A 997 Cup reaches peak 0.72G @ 5,000RPMs at the tire but has slicks. (0.52Gs @ 3,000RPMs)
- A 991 Turbo S 1st generation peak 0.8Gs. @3,000RPMs upwards

All above are approximate.
Old 07-11-2017, 12:59 PM
  #81  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,095
Received 5,018 Likes on 2,838 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
I used a 964RS with 997 Cup engine and a 4 gear gearbox on 16" tires
A 1969 911 (912) with carbon body panels and PCCB's is a FAR lighter car than a 964. And Pete has a 6speed gearbox.

Build thread in his signature here: https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-...9-gt3-cup.html
Old 07-11-2017, 01:02 PM
  #82  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,450
Received 171 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
A 1969 911 (912) with carbon body panels and PCCB's is a FAR lighter car than a 964. And Pete has a 6speed gearbox.

Build thread in his signature here: https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-...9-gt3-cup.html
That explains it.

Wow.. And those are not narrow tires

Roughly estimated at peak 0.77G acceleration in 2nd gear based on 993TT box with the listed weight.
Old 07-11-2017, 02:51 PM
  #83  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 0
Received 11,744 Likes on 5,127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kobalt
I don't know much but like this thread.

Yes, indeed.

Infinitely better than talking about flippers or the value of the R versus the GT3 with a MT.
Old 07-11-2017, 02:59 PM
  #84  
Loess
Three Wheelin'
 
Loess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,300
Received 174 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

I have to say I enjoy the technical discussions with logical (not butt-hurt) people with different views.

Why would you need to make on-off throttle adjustments mid corner? Neutral throttle through the corner and gradual acceleration on the way out? Why would there be lag in this situation? Adjusting the throttle to play with the traction limit would upset the balance with a turbo or NA car especially with a 911, although it can be fun. I would think that turbo lag would only be an issue if you close the throttle and then open it again expecting instant linear response. If you need to do this in a corner didn't you over brake?

My 3RS has turbo lag in low rpm range. I press the gas and not much happens for a bit. But maybe it's just the relatively low torque between 1500-2500 rpm. NA cars don't have linear response curves either.

The problem is that if you want a lot of horsepower and torque it's hard to get that from an NA engine. Even the 812SF has less torque than the 2RS. Some people like miata's some people like the feeling of torque.
Old 07-11-2017, 03:10 PM
  #85  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Loess
Why would you need to make on-off throttle adjustments mid corner? Neutral throttle through the corner and gradual acceleration on the way out? Why would there be lag in this situation? Adjusting the throttle to play with the traction limit would upset the balance with a turbo or NA car especially with a 911, although it can be fun.
The only way to find and stay close to the grip limit/peak mid-turn is by straddling it. The only way to straddle the grip peak is by making small steering and throttle adjustments that make the car oscillate between a little bit under and a little bit over the grip peak. With turbos, these 'little bit' adjustments are all but impossible, making the oscillations around the grip peak much wider, hence riskier and less efficient.

This great article explains this in much more detail, especially the graphs on Pages 2 and 3:

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...r-Control.aspx
Old 07-11-2017, 03:30 PM
  #86  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 705 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
That explains it.

Wow.. And those are not narrow tires

Roughly estimated at peak 0.77G acceleration in 2nd gear based on 993TT box with the listed weight.
Close. Here's the 2nd gear thrust curve based on the wheels dyno and race weight. The gearbox ratios are custom and it has a short ring and pinion, aero losses are not taken into account:

Old 07-11-2017, 03:41 PM
  #87  
bccars
Three Wheelin'
 
bccars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I drove the 991 and 991.2 turbo cars. I can feel AND hear the lag. No need for a boost gauge in the dash !
Old 07-11-2017, 04:06 PM
  #88  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,450
Received 171 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
Close. Here's the 2nd gear thrust curve based on the wheels dyno and race weight. The gearbox ratios are custom and it has a short ring and pinion, aero losses are not taken into account:

Very impressive thrust curve, 0.9+ Gs in acceleration. A bit speculative without more details, but vs. my calculated 0.77G, and assuming a shorter 3.89 R&P, it would put you right at 0.92G at around 6700RPMs and 0.55G @~3000RPM.

I will go listen to my turbo lag with bccars now
Old 07-11-2017, 04:16 PM
  #89  
T10Chris
Three Wheelin'
 
T10Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,504
Received 200 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Throttle response is not linear in a turbo car- turbos respond different based on throttle, rpm, load on the engine going up or down a hill, engine temp, your facial expression, etc etc. Whether or not you define this lack of linear response as lag is semantics, but it is a fact. It is also something that you learn to drive around and deal with. I love tracking turbo cars.

NA car is linear and mostly predictable on throttle. NA car is pretty much same response at the same time, every time. You can focus more on driving the car, steering inputs, what chassis is doing mid corner, what tires tell you, etc etc. I learn more and improve skills much more driving my NA car, and it translates over and makes me faster in my turbo car. It is so much easier to learn a technique in something that is linear.

Even with a high compression ratio mostly NA design engine with turbos added, yes response is great but you still get the non-linear wave of power when the turbos light up. Complicates that whole balance the throttle thing, but you learn with seat time/experience what to expect and how power comes on and chassis handles it and correct way to react in the specific car.

One is juggling, other is juggling on a unicycle. Easier to learn what to feel for and what is going on and what to look for without the added variable of the unicycle... or in this case, the turbochargers
Old 07-11-2017, 04:18 PM
  #90  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 705 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
Very impressive thrust curve, 0.9+ Gs in acceleration. A bit speculative without more details, but vs. my calculated 0.77G, and assuming a shorter 3.89 R&P, it would put you right at 0.92G at around 6700RPMs and 0.55G @~3000RPM.
It's actually a 4:1 R&P from a 993 cup car, should get you to right around .95 Gs and then I think our math is aligned. No question you've still got me for low end torque... until I can find coin to spring for the 4.0L upgrade, anyway


Quick Reply: How 'special' is the new GT2RS engine really?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:48 AM.