When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why don't they create the duckbill tail which Porsche makes, but with the air intake for the engine?
That might be interesting.
I do get tired of horrible rear visibility. Just got pulled over last week, because i couldn't see the cop behind me, which never would have happened in my other cars. Thankfully, I talked my way out of the ticket.
I would like a rear wing, but like a 911 turbo wing, a wing that doesn't obstruct your view most of the time, but when you push the Sport button for track racing, the wing would elevate to high position the only time the wing needs to be that high.............on a track.
Last edited by Drifting; 01-29-2015 at 10:20 AM.
Reason: .
I often find the Automotive Journalist articles funny, especially the way some of the vehicles are portrayed in pictures and in story. Take for example the barrage of articles comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the GT3 and other cars that we consider "Sports Cars". We consider them sports cars because of their handling or their track nature and even in the case of the GT3 the wing.
I don't find the Camaro Z/28 to have any of the features I'm looking for in a sports car.
Lightweight?
- nope, not even a little bit
Steering Feedback?
- Have you seen the size of the front tires? Those steam rollers tend to drown out the little nuances you want to feel.
Aero?
Well, kindof but not in a sports car way. The magazines tend not to picture the monster spoiler on the rear deck lid that looks more like a speed brake.
Styling?
- Looks like a brick.
Interior?
- All of the new Camaro's have a poorly styled interior with lousy visibility, the Z/28 is no different.
Don't neuter a perfectly good GT3 by remove the wing and don't tell me a Camaro is a sports car.
WTF.... we should sue those who try to stupidly make a racer of GT3. 
01-29-2015, 08:29 AM
