CPO warranty repairs by dealer
#16
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#17
Rennlist Member
#18
Burning Brakes
Start a search with these links.................
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...-failures.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...failure-4.html
This will get you going there are several more.
Best of Luck
PS Over the past 40 years of owning these cars there have always been some engine issues.
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...-failures.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...failure-4.html
This will get you going there are several more.
Best of Luck
PS Over the past 40 years of owning these cars there have always been some engine issues.
#19
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Start a search with these links.................
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...-failures.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...failure-4.html
This will get you going there are several more.
Best of Luck
PS Over the past 40 years of owning these cars there have always been some engine issues.
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...-failures.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...n-a-gt3-2.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...failure-4.html
This will get you going there are several more.
Best of Luck
PS Over the past 40 years of owning these cars there have always been some engine issues.
I was hoping it was just a sensor issue, but that awful, grinding sound was VERY odd, and only on the left side of the engine. . . I didn't read where anyone mentioned the sounds that they heard before failure in those posts. . .
#21
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#22
Wait...they swapped sensors rather than just installing a new $100 part? That's moronic. I'd pay the $100 and tell them to replace the bad one. Even if I had to pay the labor too.
#23
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Yes, I would have to agree that's moronic, but that seems to be par for most mechanics/car dealerships these days. I had problems with this dealer in the past, and took it to a respected independent mechanic, and the brake caliper comes loose after they work on it. This is warranty, so I take it to the local dealer, and they look at it, and just swap the sensor from one side to the other to see if the fault follows, which it either will, or the engine will blow up. . . at Sebring! So, buy a ticket to Sebring for Sunday, Jan 9 if you want to watch! . . when they could've just replaced the damn sensor. . .
Then they also want to charge me $400 for tightening the caliper nut on the caliper, which takes 10 minutes. . . I'm still waiting to hear back from the service manager. ..
#24
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
OK, so I'm breathing easier, and have more confidence in the local dealership: I just spoke with the service manager and the head technician.
The technician explained the fault as not being the misfire fault that's associated with the followers and consequent engine destruction, but it's a fault that seems to point to the electrical or mechanical camshaft actuators. PCNA policy book tells them to switch the electrical actuators to the other side to see if the fault follows, so they can determine if they need to replace the electrical or mechanical actuator. They say that the sensor almost never goes bad, in their experience.
They said this is how the CPO warranty works, but that they will replace the sensor on the fault side if I want them to do so, so I said, "YES!" replace the damn sensor on the fault side, and I'll pay out of pocket for that!
. . .and that's where things lie: if the fault occurs again, then I can simply reset the fault, and keep driving on the track, so it won't ruin my weekend!
So, in summary, the fault doesn't seem so bad, but the CPO warranty basically covers nothing, and if I want things done, I have to pay for it myself, kind of like a bad HMO health insurance.
The technician explained the fault as not being the misfire fault that's associated with the followers and consequent engine destruction, but it's a fault that seems to point to the electrical or mechanical camshaft actuators. PCNA policy book tells them to switch the electrical actuators to the other side to see if the fault follows, so they can determine if they need to replace the electrical or mechanical actuator. They say that the sensor almost never goes bad, in their experience.
They said this is how the CPO warranty works, but that they will replace the sensor on the fault side if I want them to do so, so I said, "YES!" replace the damn sensor on the fault side, and I'll pay out of pocket for that!
. . .and that's where things lie: if the fault occurs again, then I can simply reset the fault, and keep driving on the track, so it won't ruin my weekend!
So, in summary, the fault doesn't seem so bad, but the CPO warranty basically covers nothing, and if I want things done, I have to pay for it myself, kind of like a bad HMO health insurance.
Last edited by WP0; 12-30-2021 at 07:42 PM.
#25
Burning Brakes
WPO
Don't baby it when U get it back just o be sure. Keep it in Sport Plus and run it hard a track preferred B4 the CPO is over.
Chances R U will be just fine.
Ian
Don't baby it when U get it back just o be sure. Keep it in Sport Plus and run it hard a track preferred B4 the CPO is over.
Chances R U will be just fine.
Ian
The following users liked this post:
Perimeter (12-30-2021)
#26
Rennlist Member
This is a sound way to chase down problems and I like the fact that they are applying a systematic approach to failure investigation.
You seem to be jumping to a conclusion and your arm-chair "just replace it" tack may be premature
The following users liked this post:
45rake (12-30-2021)
#27
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
They swapped sensors to isolate the problem without introducing new variables like new parts.
This is a sound way to chase down problems and I like the fact that they are applying a systematic approach to failure investigation.
You seem to be jumping to a conclusion and your arm-chair "just replace it" tack may be premature
This is a sound way to chase down problems and I like the fact that they are applying a systematic approach to failure investigation.
You seem to be jumping to a conclusion and your arm-chair "just replace it" tack may be premature
#28
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
No worries, I'm in the advanced driving group with the track days driving group here in FL. . .redline with every shift. . .full throttle until time for braking! Throttle steering around some of the faster turns. . .I drive on road tires, so I'm slower than many, but it's still great fun!
The following users liked this post:
M&Abanker4life (12-31-2021)
#29
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
They swapped sensors to isolate the problem without introducing new variables like new parts.
This is a sound way to chase down problems and I like the fact that they are applying a systematic approach to failure investigation.
You seem to be jumping to a conclusion and your arm-chair "just replace it" tack may be premature
This is a sound way to chase down problems and I like the fact that they are applying a systematic approach to failure investigation.
You seem to be jumping to a conclusion and your arm-chair "just replace it" tack may be premature
Last edited by WP0; 12-31-2021 at 11:35 AM.
#30
Rennlist Member
Insofar as to whether the CPO-dealer-approved approach is sound or stupid, I suppose, depends on your perspective: from a scientific perspective, I would agree that trouble shooting part by part makes sense; however, in the real world, a methodical approach to trouble-shooting could lead to disastrous consequences, and would be considered quite stupid to try to save $2k in parts if it significantly increases the risk of possibly destroying a $200k vehicle and another $50k-500k in injuries, which, in this instance, you could argue that it does. . .