RS cams in a GT3...
#16
Rennlist Member
I look at it this way. We have Porsche telling us that these engines are different enough that this is not a problem. They have tested the RS engines using the same tests that reproduced the problem on the GT3 engines and they passed. I combine that with zero reports of this problem with the RS on RL, while MANY with GT3's have had this problem.
I am not an engine builder, but everything Porsche said adds up. And, if there is a problem, you guys will be taken care of regardless. Add it all up and it's "don't worry, be happy."
But I do find it strange about the cams. This person said power was less before they got the rebuild, and after they got the new G engine. Those seem like pretty good comparisons to get wrong. The dealer even looked into the cam situation, as it was strange to get RS cams for a GT3. No idea how all of that aligns with the PET.
I am not an engine builder, but everything Porsche said adds up. And, if there is a problem, you guys will be taken care of regardless. Add it all up and it's "don't worry, be happy."
But I do find it strange about the cams. This person said power was less before they got the rebuild, and after they got the new G engine. Those seem like pretty good comparisons to get wrong. The dealer even looked into the cam situation, as it was strange to get RS cams for a GT3. No idea how all of that aligns with the PET.
#17
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Loess
So the springs are the same for the RS? I thought the talk was that the RS had different springs (lower spring rate) which was one of the reasons the RS engine wasn't a concern for the cam/follower wear?
This is very confusing. If Porsche is saying the spring are different then why do they have the same part#. Also if everything is the same on a RS other then stroke and bore, why are they not having any issues? I'm guessing maybe a no defects in the cams?
#19
Race Director
Thread Starter
#21
Race Director
Thread Starter