Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 .2 GT3 RS goes 6:56.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2018, 02:20 PM
  #136  
Mika911
Racer
 
Mika911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London
Posts: 487
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RRDnA
Great driving - very interested to see the measured grip levels these new tires generate (as in track measured lateral and longitudinal g) - the car looks very, well driven and very glued down (in the main).
Lateral is about 1.65 where regular Cup2 reaches 1.55



.
Old 04-24-2018, 03:19 PM
  #137  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 286 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Well, 2 secs on an 86 secs track lap, Cup2-N2 vs Cup2-R is a lot. This is the difference I see between my street legal track tires, and hard slicks or Hoosier R7 on my cars on similar size laps.

That's 9-10 secs at the Nurburgring comparing N2 to R, so the folks that were guessing a 7:05 lap on the new 991.2 GT3 RS were on the money. Andreas Preuninger is already on record with the 7:20 lap in the 991.1 GT3 RS mentioning that conditions were not ideal and he wasn't satisfied with that lap, and that was done on the N1 tires, slower than the N2 tires. On equal rubber (why would anyone with a 991.1 GT3 RS purchase slow tires for track days when they will be able to buy the R for a similar price), the 991.1 and 991.2 GT3 RS are going to be around 10 secs apart at the Ring, it is still a big gap but not the 24 secs.

...and the AMG-GTR may be a little stiff for the Ring, but a more normal racetrack and lesser tires, it is not struggling to keep up with the 991 GT2RS, and it won't struggle with the GT3RS either. I think I found my Z06 replacement.
Old 04-24-2018, 03:29 PM
  #138  
signes
Rennlist Member
 
signes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 4,262
Received 632 Likes on 416 Posts
Default

^ I'd be (very) surprised if the Cup R was the same price as the N2. In fact I'd expect quite a premium. And unless you track frequently many would choose a cheaper and longer lasting tire. Agree about the impacts on times.
Old 04-24-2018, 03:36 PM
  #139  
Mika911
Racer
 
Mika911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London
Posts: 487
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

The Cup R are about 2x the price of Cup2. Not sure about longevity, but should not be much worse.
Old 04-24-2018, 04:50 PM
  #140  
oneightee
Intermediate
 
oneightee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Two seconds on a short track is quite a bit if all that is changed is the compound (same width, tread pattern, MPSC2 architecture, etc.) Will be interested to read more details as they come available, but if only the compound has changed, you're likely giving up something else. I've seen manufactures play with sidewall stiffness for the ragged-edge track cars as well, so if i'm curious if that's been tweaked at all and if so, how it will impact ride quality (hah!).
Old 04-24-2018, 06:04 PM
  #141  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,260
Received 1,224 Likes on 603 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S

...and the AMG-GTR may be a little stiff for the Ring, but a more normal racetrack and lesser tires, it is not struggling to keep up with the 991 GT2RS, and it won't struggle with the GT3RS either. I think I found my Z06 replacement.
But GT-Rs time is on the special "corvette" tires. I would not call them "lesser" - they are like hoosiers with some faint imitation of tread and last only about 1 day (or under 1 hour of driving time) if driven by an advanced driver. If the new Cup 2 Rs are like that, I do not see them being popular.
Old 04-24-2018, 08:55 PM
  #142  
unotaz
Drifting
 
unotaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Los Angeles/Taipei
Posts: 2,234
Received 974 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Based on this test, the 918 Spyder was using the Eco N0 Cup2 tires and it lapped the track in 1:26s. So what kind of lap time would it do with the Cup2 R? 1:24s??!!

Originally Posted by Mika911


Lateral is about 1.65 where regular Cup2 reaches 1.55



.
Old 04-24-2018, 09:39 PM
  #143  
JMartinni
Racer
 
JMartinni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 342
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
Well, 2 secs on an 86 secs track lap, Cup2-N2 vs Cup2-R is a lot. This is the difference I see between my street legal track tires, and hard slicks or Hoosier R7 on my cars on similar size laps.

That's 9-10 secs at the Nurburgring comparing N2 to R, so the folks that were guessing a 7:05 lap on the new 991.2 GT3 RS were on the money. Andreas Preuninger is already on record with the 7:20 lap in the 991.1 GT3 RS mentioning that conditions were not ideal and he wasn't satisfied with that lap, and that was done on the N1 tires, slower than the N2 tires. On equal rubber (why would anyone with a 991.1 GT3 RS purchase slow tires for track days when they will be able to buy the R for a similar price), the 991.1 and 991.2 GT3 RS are going to be around 10 secs apart at the Ring, it is still a big gap but not the 24 secs.

...and the AMG-GTR may be a little stiff for the Ring, but a more normal racetrack and lesser tires, it is not struggling to keep up with the 991 GT2RS, and it won't struggle with the GT3RS either. I think I found my Z06 replacement.
I thought Porsche never posted a record lap with the 991.1 GT3 RS. The Nordschleife had speed limits during that time following the GT-R GT3 crash in 2015.
Old 04-24-2018, 10:55 PM
  #144  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,260
Received 1,224 Likes on 603 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unotaz
Based on this test, the 918 Spyder was using the Eco N0 Cup2 tires and it lapped the track in 1:26s. So what kind of lap time would it do with the Cup2 R? 1:24s??!!
Yep. Given that N0 tires in 918 were not even as aggressive as N0 in .1 GT3, it could gain a lot. Insane car.
Old 04-24-2018, 11:31 PM
  #145  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,974
Received 360 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

Ok WOW! I'm not much of a " Ring times fanboy " but that's impressive!
Old 04-25-2018, 06:38 AM
  #146  
Taffy66
Burning Brakes
 
Taffy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 845
Received 458 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

If you put Cup R's on the 991.2GT3 would it lap the Nurburgring in 7 02..The weights and engine are pretty much identical so 6 seconds gained by geo/downforce etc..
Old 04-25-2018, 09:43 AM
  #147  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
Received 249 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

If Cup-R's are twice the price of Cup-2's.......then all the usual complaints about Trofeo-R's should go out the window then. You could've had Cup-R performance for the past 2 years at a bargain price.

Anybody who thinks the Cup-R is going to last as long as a Cup-2 is just plain fooling themselves.
Old 04-25-2018, 11:47 AM
  #148  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,065
Received 4,378 Likes on 2,491 Posts
Default

As long as the driver is a true pro who's familiar with the track, I don't think the driver makes much difference -- they all get pretty much everything out of the car.

Tires certainly make a big difference. If we're going to compare the various cars, they need equal tires (but that may require some change in setup of some cars, which complicates things). If these tires are crazy expensive, that could be a dealbreaker for people who want to track the car regularly (why else would you buy it?).

If the track was resurfaced, that can also matter a lot.

In any case, this car was clearly bonkers fast under the test conditions.
Old 04-25-2018, 12:16 PM
  #149  
thebishman
Burning Brakes
 
thebishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,012
Received 422 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MaxLTV
But GT-Rs time is on the special "corvette" tires. I would not call them "lesser" - they are like hoosiers with some faint imitation of tread and last only about 1 day (or under 1 hour of driving time) if driven by an advanced driver. If the new Cup 2 Rs are like that, I do not see them being popular.

I run in the Advanced run groups and aren’t what you’d call slow. The MPSC2 ZP tyres on my ‘15 Z06/7 would last me a good two HPDE weekends from new, but I made sure I had a great alignment and started them at around 25 psi cold.

Pretty sure this new ‘R’ tyre will be substantially faster.

Bish
Old 04-25-2018, 01:54 PM
  #150  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 286 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

991.2 GT3 on Hoosier R7 would lap under 7 minutes. Why anyone would over pay for MPSC2-R when Hoosier R7 made here (supporting American craftmanship, labor and products) are way faster.

I have gone through 3 sets of the MPSC2-ZP in my Z07 equipped C7Z06, now the car is on the equal compound but different tread MPSS-ZP. This same car on Hoosier is vastly faster, 0.2-0.3g increase on later grip. Even on the RE71R, my Vette had better g-forces than the MPSC2-ZP, and RE71R do not delaminate like MPSC2-ZP.

On equal tires, and normal size racetracks, 991.1 or 991.2 GT3 or RS, it is more the driver that would determine the best laps. An average advanced driver in a 991.2 GT3 RS can't stand a chance against a pro driver in a 991.1 GT3 on same compound tires.

I track on real track rubber, street tires are for that: street driving.


Quick Reply: 991 .2 GT3 RS goes 6:56.4



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:51 AM.