Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How many 15-16 gt3's have engine replaced?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2016, 03:59 PM
  #1561  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,215
Likes: 0
Received 12,077 Likes on 5,255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
I specifically remember early(2014) owners had clear warranty books which mentioned that track usage is covered as long as a more strict service interval is followed. What happened to that?
Originally Posted by neanicu
I knew it was posted by Mike somewhere :


https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...-warranty.html
I have that booklet. And mine is a MY 2015.

I thought everyone had it, no?
Old 09-01-2016, 04:11 PM
  #1562  
zedcat
Rennlist Member
 
zedcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,378
Received 410 Likes on 295 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
I knew it was posted by Mike somewhere :


https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...-warranty.html
This is just my interpretation- the Race Circuit book does not provide any specific warranty. Apparently the MY 2014 Circuit booklets included a reference to the warranty which would seem to imply that if one follows the booklet service requirements then warranty would apply. As noted previously the booklet dated 10/14 and provided with MY 2015 does not have this reference. I don't have a 2014 Warranty and Customer Information booklet but I would expect it has the same note about "driving events" and "may not be covered" language. I think Porsche would take the position the warranty book supersedes.

Again just my interpretation but I think specific warranty coverage for track use has always been a bit loose and in Porsche's favor. Since starting the track hobby/sport in 2012 I've always assumed I was taking some risk of warranty denial.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:17 PM
  #1563  
signes
Rennlist Member
 
signes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 4,286
Received 641 Likes on 423 Posts
Default

Everybody does, if it wasn't included it isn't a conspiracy, just an oversight. My GT3 and now RS both included that booklet.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:21 PM
  #1564  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,986
Received 377 Likes on 226 Posts
Default

The way I've seen it and I admit,one of the biggest selling points over the 997 GT cars was the TRACK WARRANTY. If that warranty only applies to cheap thermostats,coils and brake pucks/and not to 90K dollars engines...then it's not ok...and I see it as a stab in the back.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:23 PM
  #1565  
doubleurx
Rennlist Member
 
doubleurx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Truckee
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

There is a difference in the "driving on a race circuit booklets". It appears only the 2014 cars have the statement about warranty coverage, it is pretty clear with the use of the word "if".
Old 09-01-2016, 04:24 PM
  #1566  
RFGGT3
Burning Brakes
 
RFGGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Longboat Key, FL
Posts: 1,047
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

My 2012 Panamera Turbo warranty booklet and the 2014 GT3 booklet are identical in content except for the cover that reads Model Year 2012 and Model Year 2014. Hard to believe PCNA/PAG not honoring track related issues with the GT3/RS at least for US models.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:41 PM
  #1567  
CALSE
Racer
 
CALSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: OC
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Quickly researched Porsche's behaviour when the IMS issue came up as LEVD had suggested. Anyone else thinks we may be SOL with the GT3/RS motor design flaw when the warranty period ends?
Old 09-01-2016, 04:55 PM
  #1568  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,478
Received 1,061 Likes on 547 Posts
Default

My 2015 with an 11/14 build did not come with the track booklet. I asked for it twice but never received it.
Old 09-01-2016, 04:56 PM
  #1569  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,215
Likes: 0
Received 12,077 Likes on 5,255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CALSE
Quickly researched Porsche's behaviour when the IMS issue came up as LEVD had suggested. Anyone else thinks we may be SOL with the GT3/RS motor design flaw when the warranty period ends?
Why would anyone think otherwise?

(My apologies, but I don't mean to come off as glib.)
Old 09-01-2016, 05:10 PM
  #1570  
CALSE
Racer
 
CALSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: OC
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
Why would anyone think otherwise?

(My apologies, but I don't mean to come off as glib.)
Where is my kool-aid? :/
Old 09-01-2016, 05:11 PM
  #1571  
Omi
AutoX
 
Omi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FLT6SPD
Question, Do you think the 991 cars are smart enough to link GPS coordinates with CEL's? The GTR has a GPS based speed limiter that is automatically removed when on a track.

In the case of the GT-R, most do not have GPS limiters. That was a feature on Japanese market cars. All GT-Rs have "black boxes". When a fault is triggered (CEL or otherwise) a data snapshot is captured. Additionally, the black box has a recording of driving data. The combination of this data can then be used to identify issues and verify circumstances in warranty claims. For example, if the black box sees a modification to the ECU and sustained 30 psi from the turbos before a failure, coverage is likely to be denied, regardless of whether or not the customer returned it to stock before bringing it into the dealership.

Either way, ethics aside, misrepresenting the circumstances of failures is not going to be an effective solution.
Old 09-01-2016, 05:15 PM
  #1572  
Chris3963
Rennlist Member
 
Chris3963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Antipodes
Posts: 2,642
Received 1,091 Likes on 386 Posts
Default

Some good news.

Wrote a very detailed letter to my Porsche dealer today detailing my case, the fact that it was a known problem, that I was not given advance notice that I may have to pay, how much money I had spent on PCars in the last 18 months, highlight the track warranty conditions in the booklet that I had complied with, etc....and that if they did not positively resolve the situation I would marshal social media globally via Porsche forums.

I sent the email to my dealer at 1pm. My dealer forwarded it to PAG at around 2pm. Then at 5:30pm I got an email from my dealer saying that PAG had agreed to do the work under warranty.

Faith restored, if a little tarnished.
Old 09-01-2016, 05:20 PM
  #1573  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,215
Likes: 0
Received 12,077 Likes on 5,255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris3963
Some good news.

Wrote a very detailed letter to my Porsche dealer today detailing my case, the fact that it was a known problem, that I was not given advance notice that I may have to pay, how much money I had spent on PCars in the last 18 months, highlight the track warranty conditions in the booklet that I had complied with, etc....and that if they did not positively resolve the situation I would marshal social media globally via Porsche forums.

I sent the email to my dealer at 1pm. My dealer forwarded it to PAG at around 2pm. Then at 5:30pm I got an email from my dealer saying that PAG had agreed to do the work under warranty.

Faith restored, if a little tarnished.
Wonderful to hear!
Old 09-01-2016, 05:22 PM
  #1574  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,986
Received 377 Likes on 226 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris3963
Some good news. Wrote a very detailed letter to my Porsche dealer today detailing my case, the fact that it was a known problem, that I was not given advance notice that I may have to pay, how much money I had spent on PCars in the last 18 months, highlight the track warranty conditions in the booklet that I had complied with, etc....and that if they did not positively resolve the situation I would marshal social media globally via Porsche forums. I sent the email to my dealer at 1pm. My dealer forwarded it to PAG at around 2pm. Then at 5:30pm I got an email from my dealer saying that PAG had agreed to do the work under warranty. Faith restored, if a little tarnished.
Good news!

I'm sure they're reading this thread. They don't want this to become more than it is.
Old 09-01-2016, 05:23 PM
  #1575  
MileHigh911
Three Wheelin'
 
MileHigh911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris3963
Some good news.

Wrote a very detailed letter to my Porsche dealer today detailing my case, the fact that it was a known problem, that I was not given advance notice that I may have to pay, how much money I had spent on PCars in the last 18 months, highlight the track warranty conditions in the booklet that I had complied with, etc....and that if they did not positively resolve the situation I would marshal social media globally via Porsche forums.

I sent the email to my dealer at 1pm. My dealer forwarded it to PAG at around 2pm. Then at 5:30pm I got an email from my dealer saying that PAG had agreed to do the work under warranty.

Faith restored, if a little tarnished.
Perhaps restored---for your individual case. But are you covered NOW if you track it? I view this as a "shot over the bow" from PAG. If the next GT3/RS do not have a track warranty, then I have no interest. Many other brands are specifically given track warranty coverage on their special issue track purpose cars.

This is a design issue through and through. No question. It is not a money shift thing, where user error cause failure. They should be happy most of us are testing the engine for them.


Quick Reply: How many 15-16 gt3's have engine replaced?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:43 PM.