Cayman S Loaner
#1
Thread Starter
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,794
Likes: 11
From: North Carolina
Cayman S Loaner
My 996 is in the shop getting some new aero bits installed. My dealer gave me a Cayman S loaner and I have been driving it since Friday.
One word..........WOW!! This car is the "real deal". Porsche really did a nice job with the car. The handling is awesome and the styling is beautiful.
I only have two gripes. One, Porsche really went cheap with the HVAC system. To not put an "automatic" system in this car as standard equipment is really a crime. Second is the sound. Both the Cayman and the 987 Boxsters just don't seem to make the nice engine/intake/exhaust noises that my 986 does (or my 996 for that matter). If I owned this car I'd install a new intake and possibly a new exhaust to free up the sound.
Great car!! Unfortunately I don't have room for three P cars at the moment!!
One word..........WOW!! This car is the "real deal". Porsche really did a nice job with the car. The handling is awesome and the styling is beautiful.
I only have two gripes. One, Porsche really went cheap with the HVAC system. To not put an "automatic" system in this car as standard equipment is really a crime. Second is the sound. Both the Cayman and the 987 Boxsters just don't seem to make the nice engine/intake/exhaust noises that my 986 does (or my 996 for that matter). If I owned this car I'd install a new intake and possibly a new exhaust to free up the sound.
Great car!! Unfortunately I don't have room for three P cars at the moment!!
#3
Hmmm... funny, I think the 987s sound much better than the stock 986 "sewing machines". Maybe your 986 has an Evo intake, etc.? Also, I absolutely hate the auto climate control in my 986. I would much rather just have 2 round ***** than incessantly pecking away at little chicklet buttons.
But, I will agree the Cayman S is a way fun car. It is so much torsionally stiffer than my 986. The taller gearing masks its power, and another 50HP would be perfect. What I really like about the Caymans/Boxsters is that they are cars you can drive every day, everywhere, and drive them hard and not feel guilty about it.
But, I will agree the Cayman S is a way fun car. It is so much torsionally stiffer than my 986. The taller gearing masks its power, and another 50HP would be perfect. What I really like about the Caymans/Boxsters is that they are cars you can drive every day, everywhere, and drive them hard and not feel guilty about it.
#5
I got a regular Cayman as a loaner this week, and I agree the car is the real deal. Freaking fantstic. I thought the exhaust note was much better on the Cayman than on my 996. My only gripe about the Cayman was the shifter is incredibly sloppy. That and at 6'4 it is a bit cramped. Other than that I was totally blown away. I had the car 3 days and really didn't care when they finished with mine. I really enjoyed the Cayman.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Ray S
Automatic Climate control. You don't like those???
#9
Originally Posted by Ray S
Automatic Climate control. You don't like those???
David
#10
Originally Posted by dsmith
Since you brought it up, I absolutely despise auto climate controls on cars. One of the worst uses for technology yet. They all break, are very expensive to repair, and haven't increased the comfort/convenience of anything. WTH is wrong with 3 dials that last almost indefinitely??
David
David
#12
Thread Starter
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,794
Likes: 11
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by dsmith
Since you brought it up, I absolutely despise auto climate controls on cars. One of the worst uses for technology yet. They all break, are very expensive to repair, and haven't increased the comfort/convenience of anything. WTH is wrong with 3 dials that last almost indefinitely?? I've had 3 cars with it. Still have a BMW with it. I don't want that stuff standard on anything.
David
David
Since you indicate that "they all break and are expensive to repair" could you please cite your evidence that these systems "all break" in the 986's and 996's?
I could understand (and I'd probably agree with your objection) if the automatic systems detracted from the cars performance but it doesn't even add any weight over the manual systems.
I guess I'll just agree to disagree...
#13
Originally Posted by Ray S
Since you indicate that "they all break and are expensive to repair" could you please cite your evidence that these systems "all break" in the 986's and 996's?
I could understand (and I'd probably agree with your objection) if the automatic systems detracted from the cars performance but it doesn't even add any weight over the manual systems.
I guess I'll just agree to disagree...
I could understand (and I'd probably agree with your objection) if the automatic systems detracted from the cars performance but it doesn't even add any weight over the manual systems.
I guess I'll just agree to disagree...
Sure, you shouldn't have much of a problem for the first 5 yrs or so, maybe just display readout problems (audi/BMW). My concern is as the cars get 10-15 yrs and beyond, when the 3,4,5th owners/enthusiasts want these cars, they can't afford to keep them running due to all the electrocrap on the cars, ie 750IL.
If you buy new cars every few years, fine, no problem. Just don't expect these cars to be more than expensive paperweights 15-20 yrs from now, if you aren't ready to spend bucks not only on the normal mechanical wear items, but all of the computers, etc.
How many people are really happy with their automatic spoilers on 964 +? Same premiss that will never change. On cars that one wants to keep a LONG time, less is more.
No ill will intended. Just not sure why someone would want a more expensive, complicated system to do such a simple job as fan/flap/temp control.
Regards,
David
#14
I am a guy that does digital temperature control systems for a living, and I personally could live w/o it in my car.
I have no beef with the automatic system in the 964 or my wife's 4-Runner, as they both work flawlessly, but I also never had a problem wit a fully manual system.
I like having the option of NOT paying for it if I don't want it.
To each his own, of course.
Brian
I have no beef with the automatic system in the 964 or my wife's 4-Runner, as they both work flawlessly, but I also never had a problem wit a fully manual system.
I like having the option of NOT paying for it if I don't want it.
To each his own, of course.
Brian