A few comments on the Cayman S
#61
KBS911,
Excellence the Porsche experts if there are any in the world, said that with the exclusion of the Carrera GT and the RS GT3, the CaymanS might be the best handling Porsche EVER.
Considering the source and the many many P-cars they have driven, it makes me wonder as a BoxsterS owner if I would notice that huge a difference between the CaymanS and my car in the handling department.
Excellence the Porsche experts if there are any in the world, said that with the exclusion of the Carrera GT and the RS GT3, the CaymanS might be the best handling Porsche EVER.
Considering the source and the many many P-cars they have driven, it makes me wonder as a BoxsterS owner if I would notice that huge a difference between the CaymanS and my car in the handling department.
#64
Nordschleife Master
While the Cayman S chassis and suspension are based on the Boxster’s, the coupe is slightly larger and gains rigidity from its fixed roof architecture. This stiffer structure allows Porsche engineers to optimize the coupe’s suspension for exceptional dynamic capabilities.
Compared to Porsche’s own outstanding roadster, the body of the Cayman S offers 100 percent more resistance to flex and its torsional stiffness nearly matches that of the heralded Porsche 911 Carrera.
I would say that 100% is seriously significant.
Compared to Porsche’s own outstanding roadster, the body of the Cayman S offers 100 percent more resistance to flex and its torsional stiffness nearly matches that of the heralded Porsche 911 Carrera.
I would say that 100% is seriously significant.
#65
Spell Checker
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by perfectlap
Considering the source and the many many P-cars they have driven, it makes me wonder as a BoxsterS owner if I would notice that huge a difference between the CaymanS and my car in the handling department.
I think the cayman is an awesome little car. I just think a lot of people expected an inexpensive version of the GT3 with a dry sump. Not sure where they got that notion from. Am I disappointed. A little. But, in a few years if they overproduce these things you can pick them up cheap and stuff whatever motor you want in.
#66
perfectlap, I really don't think that you would notice a huge difference. The Boxster S is an awesome handling car. You may notice the stiffness difference "feel" however. I think that the difference would be objectively realized on the track or autoX course though by marginally better times (same driver) given the increase in hp.
#67
I presume the the tin top will always be stiffer but say you drove an open top LMP (Le Mans Prototype) and then drove a similar chasis with a tin top would you think one would be significantly stiffer than the other?
I only ask because open top Prototypes from Audi obliterated all competitors for years. If the adding a top and pillars would have made the car stiffer why didn't they ever do it?
second question: Would a convertible CaymanS (less weight more power than a 986S and CaymanS) be quicker than a tin top CaymanS? Is extra rigidity betterif t comes with more weight?
I only ask because open top Prototypes from Audi obliterated all competitors for years. If the adding a top and pillars would have made the car stiffer why didn't they ever do it?
second question: Would a convertible CaymanS (less weight more power than a 986S and CaymanS) be quicker than a tin top CaymanS? Is extra rigidity betterif t comes with more weight?
#68
Originally Posted by perfectlap
say you drove an open top LMP (Le Mans Prototype) and then drove a similar chasis with a tin top would you think one would be significantly stiffer than the other? I only ask because open top Prototypes from Audi obliterated all competitors for years. If the adding a top and pillars would have made the car stiffer why didn't they ever do it?
Alan
#69
You would really need to lay off the options to make the price savings worth it.
But I dont think that what Porsche did with this car, i.e. make a "cheaper entry level porsche" Automobile dynamics and physics show that a mid engine layout is more nuetral than rear. Not that they havent enginered the 911 to perfection,we know they did, but physics is physics.
The 911's character and driving expereince hinder on its rear engine layout in fact. It didnt matter if the engine was on the roof, Porsche is Porsche and they would have made it perfect! Drive a Cayenne Turbo if you dont believe me.
Anyway what Porsche wanted to do was offer another truely great automobile. I bet those enginers at weissach were dying inside b/c they new because of marketing reasons the 3.8 just wont make it into the caymen. Everyone knows what an amazing vehicle that would be and yearns for it. Take a Caymen with a 3.8 vs. A Carrera S onto the ring and measure the perfromance numbers AND driving impressions, my bet is the Caymen would win.
Anyway the caymen S is not a step down from the 911, just and alternative. ANd I love 911's (have a 993tt), but I bet I would love a caymen S 3.8 too! We all would. and I would buy a caymen because i want to feel what that particular platform has to offer me in terms of a driving experience.
The 911 does things for me in terms of character, history, look, etc the caymen just can"t. The Caymen will do things b/c of its mid engine layout a 911 can't. They're both great and Porsche should let us make the decision on what platform we want a 3.8 or even the 3.6 325 hp motor in Dammit b/c they're both great cars and I have a 2 car garage!
But I dont think that what Porsche did with this car, i.e. make a "cheaper entry level porsche" Automobile dynamics and physics show that a mid engine layout is more nuetral than rear. Not that they havent enginered the 911 to perfection,we know they did, but physics is physics.
The 911's character and driving expereince hinder on its rear engine layout in fact. It didnt matter if the engine was on the roof, Porsche is Porsche and they would have made it perfect! Drive a Cayenne Turbo if you dont believe me.
Anyway what Porsche wanted to do was offer another truely great automobile. I bet those enginers at weissach were dying inside b/c they new because of marketing reasons the 3.8 just wont make it into the caymen. Everyone knows what an amazing vehicle that would be and yearns for it. Take a Caymen with a 3.8 vs. A Carrera S onto the ring and measure the perfromance numbers AND driving impressions, my bet is the Caymen would win.
Anyway the caymen S is not a step down from the 911, just and alternative. ANd I love 911's (have a 993tt), but I bet I would love a caymen S 3.8 too! We all would. and I would buy a caymen because i want to feel what that particular platform has to offer me in terms of a driving experience.
The 911 does things for me in terms of character, history, look, etc the caymen just can"t. The Caymen will do things b/c of its mid engine layout a 911 can't. They're both great and Porsche should let us make the decision on what platform we want a 3.8 or even the 3.6 325 hp motor in Dammit b/c they're both great cars and I have a 2 car garage!
#70
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
many seems to feel that cayman is a "baby" 911 or it's supposed to be inferior...
i think not. it's a different car, no better no worse, just different.
i talked to RUF, for $40k they will stuff a new crate 3.8L in cayman (you get your 3.4L back). so that's about $100k, similar to 997S.
it's your money, take your pick.
i think there will be a cayman in my garage by 1/15/05 (first day they can sell them).
i think not. it's a different car, no better no worse, just different.
i talked to RUF, for $40k they will stuff a new crate 3.8L in cayman (you get your 3.4L back). so that's about $100k, similar to 997S.
it's your money, take your pick.
i think there will be a cayman in my garage by 1/15/05 (first day they can sell them).
#71
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by jt993ttchicago
The 911 does things for me in terms of character, history, look, etc the caymen just can"t. The Caymen will do things b/c of its mid engine layout a 911 can't. They're both great and Porsche should let us make the decision on what platform we want a 3.8 or even the 3.6 325 hp motor in Dammit b/c they're both great cars and I have a 2 car garage!
Too bad my 2 car garage is full -- I need a bigger house and that won't happen anytime soon. Oh well, I'll just have to suck it up and enjoy the 997S for a few years.
#72
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mooty brings up an excellent point. Base Cayman + a few options + Ruf 3.8L installation = slightly over $100k. 997S well-optioned = slightly over $100k. Hmmmm.....
#73
Originally Posted by Porsh-uh
Mooty brings up an excellent point. Base Cayman + a few options + Ruf 3.8L installation = slightly over $100k. 997S well-optioned = slightly over $100k. Hmmmm.....
Alan
#74
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
ruf will hold value very well, i think.
i think every p car is great. i had a 2002 box S. i drove the wheels right off it... I MEAN IT. it was fun, a different type of fun than my 996's and GT3.
i think every p car is great. i had a 2002 box S. i drove the wheels right off it... I MEAN IT. it was fun, a different type of fun than my 996's and GT3.
#75
Addict & Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Porsh-uh
Base Cayman + a few options + Ruf 3.8L installation = slightly over $100k