Notices
968 Forum 1992-1995

Thinking about headers???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2010, 06:51 PM
  #31  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would get a cat installed on there if i were you. It will quiet it down some. I'm running a 2.5" exhaust with a 200 cell cat & a reverse-flow turbo muffler.
Old 02-25-2010, 08:31 PM
  #32  
savvas944
Instructor
 
savvas944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: bahrain
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i agree ,my car is noisy too even with 2 straight through mufflers,no cat , in place of the original ones with a full 76 mm exhaust pipe.Got 2 tickets already within a month, but at 6750 on 4th gear the noise is something!!!
By the way from where i can check these Stahl headers and any idea of their cost?
Old 02-25-2010, 09:42 PM
  #33  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fox944
I would get a cat installed on there if i were you. It will quiet it down some. I'm running a 2.5" exhaust with a 200 cell cat & a reverse-flow turbo muffler.
Honestly I'm not really looking to quiet it down. It doesn't actually bother me, and I suppose I shouldn't be driving it fast around town anyway

Anyway, how much would a high-flow cat run? It's got to be more than a muffler with equivalent sound dampening.
Old 03-06-2010, 03:04 AM
  #34  
Grun_RS
Track Day
 
Grun_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've seen this debate a few times on different forums and IMO it boils down to what the car will be used for. For a street car, the exhaust system is optimized for best over-all performance from the factory. However, from what I've read the factory header does have a low flow issue at the joints. This may only be an issue if the engine often run at high rpm.

Generally the mistake many make when modifying the exhaust is going too big and greatly reducing the back-pressure which reduces low end power.

I agree with much of what Scott mentioned above. The best mod w/o getting into expensive engine mods is reducing weight where possible.

What I noticed was the restriction of the resonator and weight of the system. Since I heard the factory cat flows fairly well I chose to just get a cat-back system. The c/b system not only reduces weight, but also provides better flow. I also installed an aftermarket chip which works well with the c/b system.
Old 03-06-2010, 10:48 AM
  #35  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looked at pricing for the SFR header.

for those interested;

304 Stainless: $1,899.99
304 W/ Ceramic Coating: $2,229.98
321 Stainless: $2,199.98
321 w/Ceramic Coating: $2,529.97

Double slip fit adds $249.99 to the price
wastegate inlet pipe adds $149.99 to the price

I guess i wasnt loosing my mind in regards to the pricing i remembered. So the question becomes, is a 304 CC SFR header worth over $1,000 more then a Ceramic Coated Stahl header? without dyno testing.....one can only wonder. The quality is there, but no proof of gains.

As i said in the past, i purchased the Stahl header because dyno proof existed that it worked on our cars and could not justify spending over $1,000 more for a product which hasnt been dyno tested. If no one else has done so, when i'm done with my car; i may purchase an SFR header and do back to back dyno runs (keep the one that makes more power across the band and sell the other).
Old 03-06-2010, 12:06 PM
  #36  
Damian in NJ
Race Director
 
Damian in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'm don't know where you're getting your pricing from, this shows SFR at $999.

http://www.speedforceracing.com/index.php?productID=752

Originally Posted by Fox944
looked at pricing for the SFR header.

for those interested;

304 Stainless: $1,899.99
304 W/ Ceramic Coating: $2,229.98
321 Stainless: $2,199.98
321 w/Ceramic Coating: $2,529.97

Double slip fit adds $249.99 to the price
wastegate inlet pipe adds $149.99 to the price

I guess i wasnt loosing my mind in regards to the pricing i remembered. So the question becomes, is a 304 CC SFR header worth over $1,000 more then a Ceramic Coated Stahl header? without dyno testing.....one can only wonder. The quality is there, but no proof of gains.

As i said in the past, i purchased the Stahl header because dyno proof existed that it worked on our cars and could not justify spending over $1,000 more for a product which hasnt been dyno tested. If no one else has done so, when i'm done with my car; i may purchase an SFR header and do back to back dyno runs (keep the one that makes more power across the band and sell the other).
Old 03-06-2010, 12:08 PM
  #37  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm getting my prices from SFR's websight for their stage 2 header which is the "masterpiece" everyone is talking about in this thread.

The Stage 1 header is a factory replacement header and is not a 4-into-1 design like the stage 2 or stahl header.
Old 03-06-2010, 02:02 PM
  #38  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fox944
looked at pricing for the SFR header.

for those interested;

304 Stainless: $1,899.99
304 W/ Ceramic Coating: $2,229.98
321 Stainless: $2,199.98
321 w/Ceramic Coating: $2,529.97

Double slip fit adds $249.99 to the price
wastegate inlet pipe adds $149.99 to the price

I guess i wasnt loosing my mind in regards to the pricing i remembered. So the question becomes, is a 304 CC SFR header worth over $1,000 more then a Ceramic Coated Stahl header? without dyno testing.....one can only wonder. The quality is there, but no proof of gains.

As i said in the past, i purchased the Stahl header because dyno proof existed that it worked on our cars and could not justify spending over $1,000 more for a product which hasnt been dyno tested. If no one else has done so, when i'm done with my car; i may purchase an SFR header and do back to back dyno runs (keep the one that makes more power across the band and sell the other).
You weren't losing your mind but you are adding up costs that are not needed. Some of those options only apply to turbo cars or cars that are heavily tracked.
Raj
Old 03-06-2010, 04:25 PM
  #39  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would want a ceramic coated header. So it would cost me at least $2,229.98
My Stahl Header is also ceramic coated, and so was every header i ever installed on any of my project cars.

Anyway you slice the cake, you are looking at $900 to a little over a Thousand more for an SFR Header compared to a Stahl Header. And without Dyno results that prove this header gives gains/better gains (if so, how much better)...the $1,000 premium isnt justified for most people.

As for the other options, i listed them and did not add them to the price.
Old 03-06-2010, 10:46 PM
  #40  
Joel8005
Burning Brakes
 
Joel8005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anybody running headers or exhaust from these guys? www.csmotorsports.net/ They claim bigger HP claims gains from their header than Stahl.
Cheers,
Joel
Old 03-08-2010, 03:08 PM
  #41  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I saw that header for sale on ebay. I wonder if their claim refers to BHP or RWHP.
Old 03-08-2010, 03:38 PM
  #42  
Joel8005
Burning Brakes
 
Joel8005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Dont know, they are going to send me more info about their header and exhaust.
Old 03-08-2010, 04:03 PM
  #43  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome, keep us updated.
Old 03-08-2010, 04:44 PM
  #44  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fox944
I would want a ceramic coated header. So it would cost me at least $2,229.98
My Stahl Header is also ceramic coated, and so was every header i ever installed on any of my project cars.

Anyway you slice the cake, you are looking at $900 to a little over a Thousand more for an SFR Header compared to a Stahl Header. And without Dyno results that prove this header gives gains/better gains (if so, how much better)...the $1,000 premium isnt justified for most people.

As for the other options, i listed them and did not add them to the price.
I was referring to wastegate and slip fit options. You don't get either on a stahl header, so to do an apples to apples, you have to spec them similarily.
Raj
Old 03-08-2010, 04:58 PM
  #45  
Fox944
Burning Brakes
 
Fox944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Right, which is why i did not spec the header with either when i posted the prices.

Howver, I did list them (separately) for those interested. I don't understand where your confusion is.


Quick Reply: Thinking about headers???



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:07 PM.