Notices
964 Turbo Forum 1989-1994

most aggressive wheel width/offset?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2010, 08:25 PM
  #16  
jim dorociak
Rennlist Member
 
jim dorociak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here is a picture of an RSR rear 11" Speedline wheel. It is a 4.75" deep outer lip, uses a center lock and the rear centers are machined differently than the standard 10 ET 61 Speedline wheel. This is very aggressive and again uses the NA trailing arms.
Also please remember while most all the 965 owners really drive their cars, very few are willing to roll the fender lips and other extreme measures to go beyond what is being discussed. Respectfully - Jim
jdorociak@gmail.com
Attached Images  
Old 06-11-2010, 12:24 AM
  #17  
Y65MPH
Pro
 
Y65MPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brinskan
Can you explain? Why would you not want to run the NA trailing arms if in the end you could fit more rubber out back?

-BS

The NA trailing arms look like tooth picks next to the turbo arms. The other issue is the drive axle length changes. The axles are not strengthened as they are on the turbo models (I am running upwards of 700 HP on high boost). Plus other structural reinforments are needed. The US version of the 964T(3.6) used 1992 trailing arms. The ROW version used the Carrera RS system. One more thing, the NA trailing arm brake rotors are not the same as the turbo trailing arm rotors (different hubs) as well as the sway bar is different. The NA trailing arm rotor thickness is 24mm vs the turbos 28mm so you will also need the RS claiper to be safe. Handbrake cable is shorter as well. See why it gets expensive to do it right.

Craig

Last edited by Y65MPH; 06-11-2010 at 12:48 AM.
Old 06-11-2010, 11:35 AM
  #18  
brinskan
Intermediate
 
brinskan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Craig,

Thanks for that explanation. And maybe at some point I can get a ride in your car. I live in NYC and would love to feel what my car is like with more than 2x the power.

-Brian
Old 06-11-2010, 11:47 AM
  #19  
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
pcar964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So then, do we all agree that perhaps the widest wheel with stock trailing arms would be ~10.5" with an ET of ~56 to maintain the same inner clearance, while moving the outside of the wheel 11mm closer to the fender?
Old 06-11-2010, 01:15 PM
  #20  
jim dorociak
Rennlist Member
 
jim dorociak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Actually, here is what I think would be widest for a 965 with turbo trailing arms. 8.25" inner and 2.25" outer making a 10.75" rear wheel there is also a .25" crush ring in the assembly getting to a 10.75". Factory size was 61 ET 10 was built using 8" inner .25" crush, and 1.75" outer rim. Jim
jdorociak@gmail.com
Old 06-11-2010, 01:45 PM
  #21  
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
pcar964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jim dorociak
Actually, here is what I think would be widest for a 965 with turbo trailing arms. 8.25" inner and 2.25" outer making a 10.75" rear wheel there is also a .25" crush ring in the assembly getting to a 10.75". Factory size was 61 ET 10 was built using 8" inner .25" crush, and 1.75" outer rim. Jim
jdorociak@gmail.com
What ET for the 10.75"?
Old 06-11-2010, 03:05 PM
  #22  
jim dorociak
Rennlist Member
 
jim dorociak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As I calculate ET 58 - 56 depending, give or take. going out one direction an extra 1/2" but then going inward the opposite direction 1/4". Jim jdorociak@gmail.com
Old 06-13-2010, 03:14 AM
  #23  
Colorado964turbo
Burning Brakes
 
Colorado964turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 957
Received 174 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

I'm running an 11 inch HRE with 285/30 18's on the rear. Previously I had Bridgestone S0-2 without any rubbing issues, but recently swtiched to the same size in Michelins, and they tires are noticeable wider.

I can't lower the car too much more i WILL have rubbing issues. I don't actually like the wheels, but they are what came on the car when I bought it a few years ago.
Old 06-14-2010, 12:32 PM
  #24  
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
pcar964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Colorado964turbo
I'm running an 11 inch HRE with 285/30 18's on the rear. Previously I had Bridgestone S0-2 without any rubbing issues, but recently swtiched to the same size in Michelins, and they tires are noticeable wider.

I can't lower the car too much more i WILL have rubbing issues. I don't actually like the wheels, but they are what came on the car when I bought it a few years ago.
Any idea of the offset for the rear 11s? You probably have the widest wheels on a 964T with stock control arms.
Old 06-14-2010, 05:09 PM
  #25  
Colorado964turbo
Burning Brakes
 
Colorado964turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 957
Received 174 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

I can check for it, the wheels don't "really" fit though, as there is no way I could lower my car like some of you have.
Old 06-14-2010, 07:07 PM
  #26  
jim dorociak
Rennlist Member
 
jim dorociak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I would go back to my original statement. 8.25" inner rim which is .25" deeper than original. 2.25" outter rim which is .5" deeper than original making a Speedline 10.75" wheel, or a 10.5" if you only change the outer rim. Jim
Old 06-15-2010, 12:53 AM
  #27  
shiutong
Track Day
 
shiutong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Out of curio, anyone setup their 965 with 19". Pictures if you do. Thank you
Old 06-15-2010, 03:02 AM
  #28  
Thatcher
Rennlist Member
 
Thatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

19's on a 965? gross.
Old 06-16-2010, 05:55 PM
  #29  
brinskan
Intermediate
 
brinskan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just mounted 295/30/18s on 10.5 inch CCWs and they fit with no issues. Actually, I may go to a 305. The wheel well looks empty.
Old 06-16-2010, 11:16 PM
  #30  
Gandara
Pro
 
Gandara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: El Paso, Tx USA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abt cup
19's on a 965? gross.

I agree. Gross These cars are about class & finesse and raw power, how ironic. Lovely.


Quick Reply: most aggressive wheel width/offset?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:41 PM.