FS - Porsche 964 MAF Kit
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FS - Porsche 964 MAF Kit
Brand new kit from DMEShop24 for a Porsche 964. It replaces your AFM with a MAF but requires no changes to the DME.
I bought this kit for my 964, but now going a different route with a stand alone ECU that I will not need a MAF or AFM.
Price is $800 shipped. I paid over $1000 for it, so my loss is your gain.
I bought this kit for my 964, but now going a different route with a stand alone ECU that I will not need a MAF or AFM.
Price is $800 shipped. I paid over $1000 for it, so my loss is your gain.
#3
Advanced
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Berkshire, UK.
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can get them here: http://dmeshop.de/index.php?cPath=11
I'd be interested to hear if anyone has any experience of these...??
I'd be interested to hear if anyone has any experience of these...??
#5
In France, it seems to be the important step to increase the power and the efficiency of the engine before modify the ECU Eprom.
I have just a few feedback of this model. It is also used on 3.0 and 3.2 type G. the seller is in activity at least 10 years ago. In Germany, the feedbacks seem good.
I ‘ll buy it in Germany but if you want sell yours with a good price, I am interested.
I have just a few feedback of this model. It is also used on 3.0 and 3.2 type G. the seller is in activity at least 10 years ago. In Germany, the feedbacks seem good.
I ‘ll buy it in Germany but if you want sell yours with a good price, I am interested.
#7
Rennlist Member
In France, it seems to be the important step to increase the power and the efficiency of the engine before modify the ECU Eprom.
I have just a few feedback of this model. It is also used on 3.0 and 3.2 type G. the seller is in activity at least 10 years ago. In Germany, the feedbacks seem good.
I ‘ll buy it in Germany but if you want sell yours with a good price, I am interested.
I have just a few feedback of this model. It is also used on 3.0 and 3.2 type G. the seller is in activity at least 10 years ago. In Germany, the feedbacks seem good.
I ‘ll buy it in Germany but if you want sell yours with a good price, I am interested.
Trending Topics
#9
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
Instructor
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Crawley, West Sussex, UK
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
In my view, the obstruction caused by the suspended sensor in the middle of the orifice, plus the mesh obstructing the inlet, is going to decrease the air-flow significantly. It would be very interesting to see dyno numbers to know for certain.
#13
Instructor
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Crawley, West Sussex, UK
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Got this MAF kit up and running last night and drove in to work this morning. First impression is that there is no night and day difference. I thought the engine sounded a bit crisper when I revved it, but I'd have to do a back-to-back with the original MAF to confirm. Main thing is that it is plug-n-play.
I think my fears about the flow restriction are unfounded, because the air-box aperture is square and smaller in area than the circular MAF aluminium mounting flange. I did need to file the ally flange internal corners as they weren't a perfect match for the airbox aperture.
It will be interesting to see any dyno results from anyone else who has done the install. I plan to run with my wideband AFR sensor and gauge when I get a change to reinstall it, so will report back any findings then.
I think my fears about the flow restriction are unfounded, because the air-box aperture is square and smaller in area than the circular MAF aluminium mounting flange. I did need to file the ally flange internal corners as they weren't a perfect match for the airbox aperture.
It will be interesting to see any dyno results from anyone else who has done the install. I plan to run with my wideband AFR sensor and gauge when I get a change to reinstall it, so will report back any findings then.
#14
It replaces your AFM with a MAF but requires no changes to the DME.
I bought this kit for my 964, but now going a different route with a stand alone ECU that I will not need a MAF or AFM.
ACRONYM CENTRAL !!!
I bought this kit for my 964, but now going a different route with a stand alone ECU that I will not need a MAF or AFM.
ACRONYM CENTRAL !!!
#15
Rennlist Member
Got this MAF kit up and running last night and drove in to work this morning. First impression is that there is no night and day difference. I thought the engine sounded a bit crisper when I revved it, but I'd have to do a back-to-back with the original MAF to confirm. Main thing is that it is plug-n-play.
I think my fears about the flow restriction are unfounded, because the air-box aperture is square and smaller in area than the circular MAF aluminium mounting flange. I did need to file the ally flange internal corners as they weren't a perfect match for the airbox aperture.
It will be interesting to see any dyno results from anyone else who has done the install. I plan to run with my wideband AFR sensor and gauge when I get a change to reinstall it, so will report back any findings then.
I think my fears about the flow restriction are unfounded, because the air-box aperture is square and smaller in area than the circular MAF aluminium mounting flange. I did need to file the ally flange internal corners as they weren't a perfect match for the airbox aperture.
It will be interesting to see any dyno results from anyone else who has done the install. I plan to run with my wideband AFR sensor and gauge when I get a change to reinstall it, so will report back any findings then.
In other words, you can open up the intake but if you've got the same lungs, fueling, and exhaust, you're not really gaining anything. You have to take a more holistic approach! The MAF is just one piece of the puzzle.