Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

REDTEK Engine Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2014, 11:37 AM
  #91  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Assuming a 40% transmission loss through the C4 drivetrain then 350bhp @ crank will give 210bhp @ wheels? The corrected DIN figures shown should in theory mean that figures between dyno's can be compared regardless of the climatic conditions on the day.

Last edited by ras62; 01-04-2014 at 12:26 PM.
Old 01-04-2014, 02:41 PM
  #92  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A bit OT but; 40% transmission loss would make a c4 really slow surely? giving away at least 50bhp at the wheels to a c2 in stock form. Most 4wd cars are under 25%. The gearbox and front and rear diffs are a known quantity most are going to be similar in terms of losses in most cars. I've read planetary gears as used in the 964 centre diff which are less common can be 97% efficient. What's the thinking behind 40%?
Old 01-04-2014, 03:30 PM
  #93  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexjc4
A bit OT but; 40% transmission loss would make a c4 really slow surely? giving away at least 50bhp at the wheels to a c2 in stock form. Most 4wd cars are under 25%. The gearbox and front and rear diffs are a known quantity most are going to be similar in terms of losses in most cars. I've read planetary gears as used in the 964 centre diff which are less common can be 97% efficient. What's the thinking behind 40%?

Alex if you use Frank's BB dyno results as an example they show engine hp 317 with wheel hp 209. That is a 35% power loss. Once DIN corrections (for temp etc) were applied the engine power was recorded as 338 bhp. Worn transmissions or poor oil could quite easily see a 40% reduction while a perfect example might be 30%.
Adrian Steather shows comparison for acceleration between the C2 and C4. The C2 is on average 0.5 seconds quicker in each 20 mph increment in 4th and 5th gear, 70-90 mph in 4th for example 5.0 vs 5.7 seconds. That is quite a significant advantage to the C2 and nothing to do with weight at those speeds
Old 01-04-2014, 05:44 PM
  #94  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Google MAHA dyno's and drag losses - they are known for their stupidly high drag figures.

I can't argue the Streather/Porsche published through the gears figures, the engine is the same as the c2 and the c4 undoubtedly has more transmission losses so it will be slower once you get past the traction benifits, but Streather also quotes a 28% drive train loss for the C4, make of that what you will.
Old 01-04-2014, 07:00 PM
  #95  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Alex, yes a 28% loss on a new car is believable. 35-40% on a 20 year old car is also believable, old oil, wear etc. The modern Porsche 4wd systems are considerably more efficient.
Sorry for getting off topic Jack. Enjoy your new engine
Old 01-04-2014, 07:31 PM
  #96  
jack.pe
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
jack.pe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Putney, London
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
Sorry for getting off topic Jack. Enjoy your new engine
Not at all. Discussion and sharing knowledge is what the forum
Is for. Besides I initiated the dyno disussion and it's not as if you guys were talking about lipstick and hair curlers. All interesting for me.
Old 01-04-2014, 08:03 PM
  #97  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,703
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Agreed with Alex & Frank,
Dino and road fine tune is best but a before and after reading is alway good, depend how far you guys are but at Emerald they have a very accurate AWD Dino , they use it all the time.
Old 01-05-2014, 12:34 AM
  #98  
sml
Three Wheelin'
 
sml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
Alex, yes a 28% loss on a new car is believable. 35-40% on a 20 year old car is also believable, old oil, wear etc. The modern Porsche 4wd systems are considerably more efficient.
why is the c4 faster than a c2 from 0-60mph if there is so much loss?

http://www.weissach.net/964-993_RoadTestSummary.html
Old 01-05-2014, 05:28 AM
  #99  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Simple really. Different cars/days/tests....there are big variation in all those figures. It is also worth remembering the early C4's had a lightweight flywheel and the C4 has shorter 2/3 gears to aid initial acceleration.
It is generally accepted the C4 is fractionally quicker to 30, after that the C2 has a distinct advantage.
Old 01-05-2014, 06:17 AM
  #100  
MusicMadMike
Racer
 
MusicMadMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oxted, Surrey, UK
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Alex so happy for you mate. I know exactly the feeling just prior to getting the engine back in. I actually think I lost sleep for days. I have to say that ***** waggling about power is something that as car nuts we are all to some extent guilty off, and the search for more or justification to its very existence can sometimes detract from the point. I consider us all very lucky/ hard working individuals that have great machines at our disposal. I don't think I've ever got in Peppa and thought first she needs more power. In fact I only really think they come when reading forum posts about other peoples monsters. But i do believe that our machines were gifted adequate power from factory but we were not gifted Walter Rohrl abilities as drivers and surely that's where we should be directing a little more of our energy and to a certain extent time, hence the whole track day thing. I not opposed to a little arms proliferation indeed I intend to add something to the arsenal at some point but to get back to the point a once leaky asthmatic 964 engine has just had some major surgery and lives to breathe again. Something to celebrate? Definitely. I love it jack well done mate. The shiny bits look awesome and when transplanted back into that gorgeous blue featherweight you will have have fun aplenty regardless of final figures. Hope to see you next week.
Old 01-05-2014, 06:50 AM
  #101  
boxsey911
Nordschleife Master
 
boxsey911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK-BETTY

It's all a bunch of *****. Power is what you feel. Everything written on a chart means crap.
Totally agree with you. My butt dyno told me recently that my car was missing some power at the top end. When we found and fixed the problem my butt dyno told me that the power was back.


Originally Posted by MusicMadMike
Alex so happy for you mate. I know exactly the feeling just prior to getting the engine back in. I actually think I lost sleep for days. I have to say that ***** waggling about power is something that as car nuts we are all to some extent guilty off, and the search for more or justification to its very existence can sometimes detract from the point. I consider us all very lucky/ hard working individuals that have great machines at our disposal. I don't think I've ever got in Peppa and thought first she needs more power. In fact I only really think they come when reading forum posts about other peoples monsters. But i do believe that our machines were gifted adequate power from factory but we were not gifted Walter Rohrl abilities as drivers and surely that's where we should be directing a little more of our energy and to a certain extent time, hence the whole track day thing. I not opposed to a little arms proliferation indeed I intend to add something to the arsenal at some point but to get back to the point a once leaky asthmatic 964 engine has just had some major surgery and lives to breathe again. Something to celebrate? Definitely. I love it jack well done mate. The shiny bits look awesome and when transplanted back into that gorgeous blue featherweight you will have have fun aplenty regardless of final figures. Hope to see you next week.
Well put Mike. A stock 964 engine has enough power to overwhelm the chassis. Most of us don't have the ability to get it to that point. The best part about a freshly rebuilt engine is that you have all that original power back and you know you can enjoy it for many more years. Jack will soon have this pleasure.
Old 01-05-2014, 07:56 AM
  #102  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...&products_id=8

Sorry Steve..I just couldn't resist
Old 01-15-2014, 07:56 AM
  #103  
jack.pe
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
jack.pe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Putney, London
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Engine back on and should be ready on Saturday for pickup...

Old 01-15-2014, 09:09 AM
  #104  
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
 
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default



How did the remap go?
Old 01-15-2014, 09:30 AM
  #105  
Lemass Automotive
Rennlist Member
 
Lemass Automotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stoke Poges, UK
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

great stuff


Quick Reply: REDTEK Engine Build



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:13 PM.