Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Motronic v Motec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2013, 06:07 PM
  #16  
Strega(UK)
Pro
 
Strega(UK)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Clearly you guy's state side have got money to burn? Me, I would shop around elsewhere and get a much better price.
Old 08-15-2013, 06:54 PM
  #17  
VR6-er
Racer
Thread Starter
 
VR6-er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stoke Poges
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexjc4
We need someone to make something like this for the 964 http://www.augmentautomotive.co.uk/augtronic

Its for the 944 but they run a similar ECU in many ways; Motronic ML3.1 vs M2.1, I was talking to some 944 guys at Donington about this, not looked in detail, but at first glance this guy has done something rather clever. Standard box with new guts, so you can use Alpha-N, MAP (speed density) or MAF (mass flow) for load measurement, keep the knock control and all sorts of other fun toys for about a grand.
That is interesting Alex. Looks like a simple upgrade for minimal dosh. I wonder what the difference is between 2.1 & 3.1
Old 08-15-2013, 07:04 PM
  #18  
FeralComprehension
Rennlist Member
 
FeralComprehension's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit (Rock City); 1990 C4
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Strega(UK)
Clearly you guy's state side have got money to burn? Me, I would shop around elsewhere and get a much better price.
Are you grasping that our arguments are based on the cost of a service and not simply commoditized hardware?

As I said previously, if you can do it to expert standards without having to pay an expert, that's great. Credit people with the wisdom to know their own limitations.
Old 08-15-2013, 07:11 PM
  #19  
vagluv
Burning Brakes
 
vagluv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Strega(UK)
Clearly you guy's state side have got money to burn? Me, I would shop around elsewhere and get a much better price.
If you pay less, but it doesnt perform to the standards you expect, was it really a BETTER price? No. It's not about price, it's about value.

In our mostly capitalistic economies, at least when it comes to services and private consumers, the phrase "you get what you pay for" is generally true.
Old 08-15-2013, 07:14 PM
  #20  
Babalouie
Burning Brakes
 
Babalouie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You get what you pay for...sure you can get it done cheap, but then you can't complain if it takes three goes to start it, or if it kangaroos in slow traffic, or if it runs dangerously lean on a hot day
Old 08-15-2013, 07:35 PM
  #21  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

£1000 Labour
£1185 M84 ecu (recently reduced from £1495)
£500 9m M84 to 964 wiring adapter & sensor extension harnesses (sensor harness obliviates the need to modify the original Porsche wiring loom)
£560 9m Fuel injector x 6
£345 Motec Lambda sensor, AT sensor, TPS sensor, MAP sensor
£295 9m Stainless steel air intake pipe & K&N cone filter
£175 Hardware: TPS plate & machined shaft, MAP plate, Vacuum lines, brackets, fasteners
Total £4060+VAT

For Motec being fitted to an ITB engine we recommend that you have a custom wiring harness made from the M84 to the engine rather than using the stock Porsche loom. This would cost an additional £500. The loom is made in-house from lightweight Raychem aircraft grade wire, fully encapsulated with heat proof heat shrink, labelled and terminated with new Bosch plugs.
Old 08-15-2013, 07:51 PM
  #22  
fuch
Rennlist Member
 
fuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naphill
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A good friend of mine runs a company that does mapping for tuner cars but also big name car manufactures & I know he spends many hours mapping cars to get them right & often when he's given a car by a manufacture he often lives with the car on a Daily basis on the dyno & road to get it spot on so I can understand why it's not cheap but it's certainly not expensive when you cost it all down in time/parts/knowledge...
Old 08-15-2013, 07:58 PM
  #23  
fuch
Rennlist Member
 
fuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naphill
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ha,ha Colin I'm slow on the keyboard & you've done a costing of it!!.....there you go that's how much it is to do it right guys.
Or give this a go?
Old 08-15-2013, 08:37 PM
  #24  
Babalouie
Burning Brakes
 
Babalouie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

TBH, carbs would be more reliable/refined than a poorly executed programmable ecu
Old 08-16-2013, 04:47 AM
  #25  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Most if not all supporters of using Motec do so because they find it a simple platform to modify which sits nicely with other tuning parts they offer.
Most if not all supporters of Motec cannot modify the Motronic system because they cannot use the Hex language it requires. Do not confuse this with Motec being superior to Motronic as it is not.
The knock control issue has been raised, but also the OBD offered by Motronic is also lost when Motec is used. The key component to raising power is new injectors and these will run quite happily on Motronic, largely making the case for Motec redundant.
Old 08-16-2013, 05:27 AM
  #26  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You don't need to edit the ROM by hand there are a few people that have figured out the addresses so you can use a ROM emulator and Tuner Pro or this:http://www.pro2dme.com/sc_shots.htm

The Motronic in a 964 does have advanced knock control for the era it comes from but the motec knock unti is just as good if expensive.

You loose OBD but you gain CANBUS which is a world better.

Our old Motronic is held back by the limitations of the injection control, ignition control, load sensing (throttle switch rather than proper tps, and barn door AFM). People have figured out the transfer function to properly use a MAF now but you still have the other limitations, which is why that Augtronic thing is interesting, they have completey re written the micro controller code, add a proper tps and a big maf or map sensor and away you go. But as with a few aftermarket ecus you are putting your faith in the genius and continuing interest of one man.

Motec is expensive not just in terms of numbers but in terms of value compared to equally competent competitors. The value comes in the brand and in the specialists that trust it and can do a good job with it. That said it really isn't terrible value for money. The difference in price is not a big deal if you genuinely get something perfect delivered. But that isn't guaranteed I have seen Motec installs that run worse than a cheap ROM chip job.
Old 08-16-2013, 05:45 AM
  #27  
VR6-er
Racer
Thread Starter
 
VR6-er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stoke Poges
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
......The key component to raising power is new injectors and these will run quite happily on Motronic, largely making the case for Motec redundant.
Thanks RAS. What is it about these injectors thats different?

Originally Posted by alexjc4
...........Our old Motronic is held back by the limitations of the injection control, ignition control, load sensing (throttle switch rather than proper tps, and barn door AFM). People have figured out the transfer function to properly use a MAF now but you still have the other limitations, which is why that Augtronic thing is interesting, they have completey re written the micro controller code, add a proper tps and a big maf or map sensor and away you go. But as with a few aftermarket ecus you are putting your faith in the genius and continuing interest of one man.

Motec is expensive not just in terms of numbers but in terms of value compared to equally competent competitors. The value comes in the brand and in the specialists that trust it and can do a good job with it. That said it really isn't terrible value for money. The difference in price is not a big deal if you genuinely get something perfect delivered. But that isn't guaranteed I have seen Motec installs that run worse than a cheap ROM chip job.
The wisdom I was looking for. I'm going to drop the chap at Augtronic a line.
Old 08-16-2013, 05:59 AM
  #28  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexjc4
You don't need to edit the ROM by hand there are a few people that have figured out the addresses so you can use a ROM emulator and Tuner Pro or this:http://www.pro2dme.com/sc_shots.htm

The Motronic in a 964 does have advanced knock control for the era it comes from but the motec knock unti is just as good if expensive.

You loose OBD but you gain CANBUS which is a world better.

Our old Motronic is held back by the limitations of the injection control, ignition control, load sensing (throttle switch rather than proper tps, and barn door AFM). People have figured out the transfer function to properly use a MAF now but you still have the other limitations, which is why that Augtronic thing is interesting, they have completey re written the micro controller code, add a proper tps and a big maf or map sensor and away you go. But as with a few aftermarket ecus you are putting your faith in the genius and continuing interest of one man.

Motec is expensive not just in terms of numbers but in terms of value compared to equally competent competitors. The value comes in the brand and in the specialists that trust it and can do a good job with it. That said it really isn't terrible value for money. The difference in price is not a big deal if you genuinely get something perfect delivered. But that isn't guaranteed I have seen Motec installs that run worse than a cheap ROM chip job.
CANBUS. Better define better Alex! Can your Indy plug in his hammer and diagnose or are you captive to the man who installed the Motec?

The limitations of the AFM are nothing to do with the Motronic, but it should be remembered that a MAF can be used with Motronic quite easily and effectively.

The fact is that there are very few people capable of tuning the Motronic system. This should not be confused with the system not being good enough to compare with Motec. Motec is not good value for money imo.

VR6-er.. The new injectors simply give higher flowrates and a finer spray pattern.
Old 08-16-2013, 06:29 AM
  #29  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Everyone uses CANBUS these days. It blows OBD out the water http://www.talktomycar.co.uk/can.htm

The motronic is built around flow sensing (afm) not mass sensing (maf) the calculations required to meter fuel vs air are different and require a range of different adjustments and inputs. MAF is much simpler and more flexible in changing conditiond both in the engine and environment.

Rescaling the injector multiplier is indeed not a problem in motronic. Its one number. You may need to change the null time/ latency at the same time though depending on the new injector characteristics.

You can do plenty with the Motronic don't get me wrong. For the realistic power you would get out of all but the wildest M64 you could probably get it to do a decent job if you found someone really good to do it.
But if you spend 15k on an engine for 100bhp gain, a couple of grand on an ecu to get the most out of it seems sensible.

my two nissans are 60 and 100bhp over stock and both use the standard ecu with a ROM edit, in one case mapped by me, another by a real expert who fits uprev, syvecs and link g4s all day long, his view was for the small gains i was after the standard ecu would do fine. BUT the nissans use MAF off the shelf and have a really friendly calibration layout, and some great well tested ROM editing gear.

Last edited by alexjc4; 08-16-2013 at 07:19 AM. Reason: I underestimated the power-ups on the datsuns a little
Old 08-16-2013, 06:47 AM
  #30  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
Most if not all supporters of using Motec do so because they find it a simple platform to modify which sits nicely with other tuning parts they offer.
Most if not all supporters of Motec cannot modify the Motronic system because they cannot use the Hex language it requires. Do not confuse this with Motec being superior to Motronic as it is not.
The knock control issue has been raised, but also the OBD offered by Motronic is also lost when Motec is used. The key component to raising power is new injectors and these will run quite happily on Motronic, largely making the case for Motec redundant.

The most experienced hex tuner in the country, Wayne Schofield, works from our premises. At the end of the day we would not sell the 9m Motec conversion if we could achieve the same results with Motronic. Each have their advantages and disadvantages, we leave it up to the individual client to make his own decision following advice from both myself and Wayne but generally will offer the most cost effective solution for their needs.


Quick Reply: Motronic v Motec



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:37 PM.