Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 vs 993 3.6 motor

Old 05-16-2013, 06:13 PM
  #1  
GBX
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
GBX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LI
Posts: 2,436
Received 268 Likes on 125 Posts
Default 964 vs 993 3.6 motor

I know this has been discussed at length but i was hoping to get some current opinons. For my 964 backdate build, i have the choice of a motor. I love the idea of hydrolic lifters so i dont need to incur the cost of a valve adjustment every 3,000 miles. Is this enough to go with the 993? This car will be build as a weekend or many even daily driver. The car will see very little track time, if any. What motor is more mod friendly? What's going to keep me smiling for years to come??
Old 05-16-2013, 06:25 PM
  #2  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,699
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

A late 993 Varioram is good option as it is more powerful and has more torque than the 964.... If you wish in futur more performance , you may find you need to convert it to solid rockers for a high lift cam

Hope that helps
Old 05-16-2013, 07:07 PM
  #3  
Laker
Drifting
 
Laker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philly 'burbs
Posts: 2,591
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

the 964 valve adjustment interval is 12 or 15k miles IIRC
Old 05-16-2013, 07:10 PM
  #4  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kos11-12
A late 993 Varioram is good option as it is more powerful and has more torque than the 964.... If you wish in futur more performance , you may find you need to convert it to solid rockers for a high lift cam

Hope that helps
If the vram is RoW, I agree, if US not so much, the US cars from '96 up are saddled w/ no so user friendly OBD2.
Old 05-16-2013, 10:31 PM
  #5  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GBX
I know this has been discussed at length but i was hoping to get some current opinons. For my 964 backdate build, i have the choice of a motor. I love the idea of hydrolic lifters so i dont need to incur the cost of a valve adjustment every 3,000 miles. Is this enough to go with the 993? This car will be build as a weekend or many even daily driver. The car will see very little track time, if any. What motor is more mod friendly? What's going to keep me smiling for years to come??
JMHO, so with a grain of salt, I offer;

993 engines are a little more maintenance-friendly due to lack of valve adjustments. Lifters, OTOH, aren't cheap when they require replacement and most of the higher-mileage engines will need this sooner than later.

964 engines, while offering less performance, have a much better crankshaft & rods which makes them a better candidate for future modifications.

993 engines offer more initial, out-of-the-box performance, especially the Varioram versions. I'd strongly suggest a '97 or '98 version since those can be chipped much easier (and less $$$$) than the '96 ones. 95's have a socketed chip which is less expensive to replace.

964 engines are very good, especially the '92 & later ones due to the inclusion of head gaskets and a lighter, more efficient intake manifold.

Any of them are great daily drivers and very reliable with good maintenance.

Hope this helps a little,
Old 05-17-2013, 02:41 AM
  #6  
993James993
Burning Brakes
 
993James993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Valve adjustment should only be every 15K miles. My '95 with light weight flywheel and Steve Wong chip is more powerful than my '90 964, but the 964 is my daily driver.
Old 05-17-2013, 08:27 AM
  #7  
BigMikeATL
Burning Brakes
 
BigMikeATL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 1,068
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems

964 engines are very good, especially the '92 & later ones due to the inclusion of head gaskets and a lighter, more efficient intake manifold.
I think you meant '91 and later?
Old 05-17-2013, 07:48 PM
  #8  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
......
964 engines, while offering less performance, have a much better crankshaft & rods which makes them a better candidate for future modifications.

...
and a GT3 crank is even better
Old 05-18-2013, 09:06 AM
  #9  
Sire
Racer
 
Sire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Netherlands/ The Hague
Posts: 364
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

does it matter what type of gt3 crank?


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 964 vs 993 3.6 motor



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:02 PM.