Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Track wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2011, 03:51 PM
  #16  
Earlydays
Three Wheelin'
 
Earlydays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney, Texas
Posts: 1,400
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Another factor to consider is the tire weight difference between brands.
I run Yoko AD08's in 16" sizes for autocrossing in SCCA's Street Tire - C Stock class.
I narrowed my choice to the Yoko's and Bridgestone RE11's. I chose the AD08's because they were 2 lbs. lighter per tire in the front and 4 lbs lighter per tire in the rear. In fact in my sizes the Yoko's were also lighter than Dunlop Star Specs and Hankook RS3's.
Old 07-28-2011, 05:43 PM
  #17  
ThomasC2
Drifting
 
ThomasC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 2,134
Received 41 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

At the moment i use cup1 replicas from millemiglia for track, 17" with MSPC tires. The rims are a notch heavier than my OEM cup rims. But the weight of the tires are important to. The replica set up with MSPC are lighter than my OEM rims with Toyo 888's. Japaneese tires seems to be heavier than at least michelin. It was the same with an earlier set of bridgestone tires.

The price of 18" MPSC has come down to more or less 17" level now so for next season i'm now considering a set of BBS E28 rims in 18" if we can agree of the price tag. That would give me low weight and low flex due to lower profile. We'll see.

Thomas
Old 07-28-2011, 07:02 PM
  #18  
boxsey911
Nordschleife Master
 
boxsey911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thomas, you may find the 18 inch MPSCs easier to get hold of too. Over here (UK) it's almost impossible to by new MPSCs in 17 inch sizes.
Old 07-28-2011, 10:18 PM
  #19  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
Unfortunately, I don't use AIM otherwise I would and as much as I wish I could say I am a consistent enough driver that anyone would pay me money to drive, alas I cannot. So without proof to share I will leave it to KaiB.



Much more so than I original thought it would be, add the 4 pounds per corner i saved with the aluminum hats on the brakes and I can't imagine going back. now if I can only get through the driver improvement program and drop those extra pounds i might actually be fast.
See, that's the thing at our level--we're too inconsistent. If I've got time tomorrow I'll slap on the 18s and just do some ~50-110 runs up the front straight (will keep the grip levels out of the equation, Hoosiers v. dead RA1s).
Old 07-28-2011, 11:24 PM
  #20  
KaiB
Nordschleife Master
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Don't misunderstand me here ya'll. I said I have no proof.

My comment, I had hoped, would only open doors to consideration that that much in weight savings (ca. 6#/corner) could certainly be worth discussing as measureable.

I say it is - once again without proof.
Old 07-29-2011, 04:32 AM
  #21  
ThomasC2
Drifting
 
ThomasC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 2,134
Received 41 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boxsey911
Thomas, you may find the 18 inch MPSCs easier to get hold of too. Over here (UK) it's almost impossible to by new MPSCs in 17 inch sizes.
True, and that's also a reason for moving up to 18".

Thomas
Old 07-29-2011, 11:10 AM
  #22  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,531
Received 2,137 Likes on 1,280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KaiB
Don't misunderstand me here ya'll. I said I have no proof.

My comment, I had hoped, would only open doors to consideration that that much in weight savings (ca. 6#/corner) could certainly be worth discussing as measureable.

I say it is - once again without proof.
I understood you, as I think others did. Although your comment made sense that is why I used it. Considering a total savings of 30 pounds off the car which is significant in itself and if you start to get into the physics of it which is where I fall short i am sure the energy required to rotate and stop the rotation of a 9 pound lighter wheel is less so theoretically you should be able to accelerate and stop the car quicker. Possibly even get longer life from those expense pagid pads too.

I know I have a chevy avalanche that came with 2 sets of wheels the stock rims and tires which are 20" and weigh 61 pounds a corner and some larger 22" wheels and wider tires that weigh 76 pounds a corner. You can really feel the difference in acceleration and it is incredibly noticeable under hard braking that the car does not stop as quickly with the heavier wheels. It handles and rides better with the larger wheels and tires but the scary braking and significant reduction in gas mileage makes such a difference I stick with the stock wheels now. I am sure this would apply to track wheels and tires as well.

Ken we anxiously await your results and enjoy the day even if your on old RA-1's.
Old 07-30-2011, 02:51 AM
  #23  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Quick post mortem. Got 127 terminal speed today on one of two fliers, which is flirting with all-time best (2:02.7 lap, third of the day). Day was cut short for driving as I had the left front caliper bolts back out from the threads pulling from the hub. Grr...... Hopefully able to fix, as it's an RSR hub. But I can compare from last month with the 18s, and I'll make it a time-to-distance comparison as opposed to merely top speed.
Old 07-31-2011, 02:02 PM
  #24  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

To finish off beating this dead horse, here's what I've come up with. All measurements are basically running up the front straight at Thunderhill. With the above-mentioned brake caliper mounting issue I wasn't able to put the RA1s on 18s on, so I had to go back and look at other data. But it's consistent.

So here goes (all measurements are over approximately 1670ft):

11/10 (~70F, no wind) with full tread RA1 235 + 275 on Fikse 8+ 10 X 18 (bypass pipes + Fabspeed mufflers)--
65.8MPH -> 115.3MPH (49.5MPH gain) in 12.329 sec

6/11 (~85F, no wind) severely worn RA1 235 + 275 on Kinesis 8 + 10 X 18 (catalytic converter + stock mufflers)--
64.5MPH -> 112.9MPH (48.4MPH gain) in 12.556 sec

7/11 (~98F, no wind) new, but 6 year old Hoosier GAC 245 + 275 on Cup 1 replica 7.5 + 9 X 17 (catalytic converter + stock mufflers)--
64.9MPH -> 115.4MPH (50.5MPH gain) in 11.132 sec

Now here's another data point. The Friday data I had to pull from further back in the lap since I was at 73.1MPH (v. ~65MPH) from running Hoosiers, albeit seemingly aged out ones. The ultimate laps being considered here were Example 1 @ 2:04.098 (bypass config, ~2 seconds quicker), Example 2 @ 2:07.609 (full config, really dead tires), Example 3 @ 2:02.756 (Hoosiers, new but 6 years old).

So draw your own conclusions. I submit that we're not good enough at our level for it to matter in the least....................... Most important thing is to have a well prepped car that is consistent, and from which you can learn.

(Obligatory videos here, of what NOT to do on track. #1 is just a bad line on a critical turn following a guy who'd held me up for at least 1/2 lap, then how long it takes for him to let me by. #2 is another guy I've come to know who is mirror-blind, and initially how far ahead he's leading the train to how clueless he is in letting people by to finally me taking an opening that, in retrospect, really wasn't there.)


Old 07-31-2011, 10:00 PM
  #25  
ChaseN
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ChaseN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, didn't realize this thread would provide such great reading! Thanks to all you guy for the great information. Let me clarify that I am but a plebian still at the street tire skill level. One bonus to the Cup II's is they came with a near brand new set of Michelin PS2's (9/32" tread depth left) for a grand total of $350. Should be worth some trackday hoots.

Originally Posted by cobalt
Sorry i didn't read this earlier but why the need to stay with factory wheels and 17's?

For starters I would never use a chromed wheel for track use. You can have a wheel begin to fail and never see it with all the chrome buildup. The cup II's are not much lighter than the cup I's and i am sure if you weigh them they weigh more than painted cup I's now that they have been plated.

You get much better feel and less sidewall flex with 18's I am using fikse's and they work better than the 8 & 9's CupI''s I have. Much less un-sprung weight, better turn in and yes the tires are slightly more expensive but not much.

The OZ's posted are the wheel of choice for most 964 track guys I know. Great price well made and durable. I would never compromise tires wheels or brakes for a small amount of money. Safety first. Yes you can use 18's on the track even though it is not recommended by Porsche. I have thousands of track miles on 18's and no issues at all.

Not trying to upset you but I think you will find you will be far happier with the OZ's than the Cup II's.
Thanks for the response Cobalt. I have no problem with 18's - I run the 18" turbo twist reps on the street as I like the look & don't worry about the extra weight off the track. I was mostly looking for 17's as consumables are cheaper, as well as the wheels themselves mostly being cheaper! Re: the chrome plating, I agree with you as far as weight & the crack issue. I'm fortunate enough that I work in a shop with access to a large media blasting cabinet and plan on blasting what I can of the plating off. Anything I should know about blasting chrome plating?

On the other hand, you've lodged some pretty serious doubts in my mind about these wheels. I may just run 'em till the tires are shot and look elsewhere.

Originally Posted by race911
I'm back to running some old Cup 1s on the faux RS since I have 3 sets of old (but new) 17" tires that are worth burning up at instruction days. Can't say I'm any slower than with the 18s, and actually my fastest times with the car were one time with some 245/275 17s right in their sweet spot.

I've got some old HRE 8 & 9 X 17 for 964 application that don't fit over Big Reds, up at the track. I'll be up there Friday, and if you're totally bummed about the chrome ones you picked up I can take some photos.
I'm very interested, only thing is that in my mind HRE = $$$. PM me a dollar figure you had in mind and we'll go from there. I might be able to scrape something together.

Originally Posted by Fikse Wheels
If you can justify the extra $$ I would be happy to help you with your track wheel needs.
Thanks for the offer, I'm way out of new Fikse price range right now - getting married in 2 months . Some day I imagine I'll be giving you a call though.
Old 08-01-2011, 11:23 AM
  #26  
Dwane
Race Car
 
Dwane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,741
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info Ken! These threads and posts are pricele$$!
I've been looking for a set of used (light) 17's for a while. I'll take the wheels off the list and start looking for some RS bars instead.
Old 08-01-2011, 11:47 AM
  #27  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,531
Received 2,137 Likes on 1,280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by race911
To finish off beating this dead horse, here's what I've come up with. All measurements are basically running up the front straight at Thunderhill. With the above-mentioned brake caliper mounting issue I wasn't able to put the RA1s on 18s on, so I had to go back and look at other data. But it's consistent.

So here goes (all measurements are over approximately 1670ft):

11/10 (~70F, no wind) with full tread RA1 235 + 275 on Fikse 8+ 10 X 18 (bypass pipes + Fabspeed mufflers)--
65.8MPH -> 115.3MPH (49.5MPH gain) in 12.329 sec

6/11 (~85F, no wind) severely worn RA1 235 + 275 on Kinesis 8 + 10 X 18 (catalytic converter + stock mufflers)--
64.5MPH -> 112.9MPH (48.4MPH gain) in 12.556 sec

7/11 (~98F, no wind) new, but 6 year old Hoosier GAC 245 + 275 on Cup 1 replica 7.5 + 9 X 17 (catalytic converter + stock mufflers)--
64.9MPH -> 115.4MPH (50.5MPH gain) in 11.132 sec

Now here's another data point. The Friday data I had to pull from further back in the lap since I was at 73.1MPH (v. ~65MPH) from running Hoosiers, albeit seemingly aged out ones. The ultimate laps being considered here were Example 1 @ 2:04.098 (bypass config, ~2 seconds quicker), Example 2 @ 2:07.609 (full config, really dead tires), Example 3 @ 2:02.756 (Hoosiers, new but 6 years old).

So draw your own conclusions. I submit that we're not good enough at our level for it to matter in the least....................... Most important thing is to have a well prepped car that is consistent, and from which you can learn.

(Obligatory videos here, of what NOT to do on track. #1 is just a bad line on a critical turn following a guy who'd held me up for at least 1/2 lap, then how long it takes for him to let me by. #2 is another guy I've come to know who is mirror-blind, and initially how far ahead he's leading the train to how clueless he is in letting people by to finally me taking an opening that, in retrospect, really wasn't there.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1241ld4rs4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbYw-rfstao
Well very nice and thanks for sharing I doubt the .2 inches less rolling diameter made a difference although I am curious how much the rubber compound did. I am not sure if i will have the time to do anything at the Glenn this coming weekend but if I can i will post the differences between the cupI's and the fikse's since both are running R888's on them I think it would be a better apples to apples comparison.

Originally Posted by ChaseN
Wow, didn't realize this thread would provide such great reading! Thanks to all you guy for the great information. Let me clarify that I am but a plebian still at the street tire skill level. One bonus to the Cup II's is they came with a near brand new set of Michelin PS2's (9/32" tread depth left) for a grand total of $350. Should be worth some trackday hoots.
Actually starting out with the PS2's is a smart move. just watch you don't heat cycle them out long before you run out of tread. I spent an entire season on PS2's while my wife learned to drive. We share a car and with back to back runs there was no time to switch tires so i endured for a season so she could learn. It teaches you a lot about the car and limits of adhesion and they do speak to you better than the R compounds. They can get quite sticky for a street tire and have decent dry traction so you will have a lot of fun. Although don't be too anxious to move on to R compounds it will be hard to go back once you make the change.

I agree with you evaluate how you are doing after a season and you will be a better driver for it in the end.



Quick Reply: Track wheels



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:30 PM.