Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Non stock cam users....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2010, 04:19 PM
  #16  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
.....




I would not agree with your assessment. The Webcam 20/21 cams are CIS cams and are awful on an injected engine. Furthermore, you are missing the lobe centerline information which has a lot to do with the characteristics of the camshaft. From the spintron testing I've done, the Porsche camshafts have slow openeing ramps and are very hard on the valvetrain with high harmonics. I think this is a funamental reason why custom camshafts with similar lift and duration outperform a Porsche camshaft.

FWIW, it has been my experience that very little is gained from a 3.8l conversion (3.8RS pistons, RS cams, and a chip). I don't know how much the motronic programming limitation is the cause or simply the heavy Mahle pistons and poor squish. I am about to install a MoTeC system + the 9M USA Sport 2 camshafts on an engine with the 3.8l RS pistons. We'll see what happens. The baseline showed 254whp where the 3.6l with the same cams and MoTeC showed 301whp. (basically the car you rode in Bill). It will be interesting to see the difference.

Technically speaking the 964 RS/Cup engines are not blueprinted. The parts for the engine are hand selected and have tighter tolerances in weight and sizing. If you simply install an RS ECU into your stock street car, you get the +13hp the RS engine has. So, yes, it is all the Motronic programming.
I should have said purported to work in 3.6/3.8, I take Geoffreys advice and info any day.

Thats what blueprinting is, hand select and fit all the pieces w/ an eye to performance not longevity or noise

can't wait to see how the new engine performs too

the other thing not mentioned here is that the bottom end needs to be built w/ an eye to the rpm that the top end and cams will want.
Old 03-19-2010, 04:50 PM
  #17  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Thats what blueprinting is, hand select and fit all the pieces w/ an eye to performance not longevity or noise
Blueprinting is well beyond that. It has to do with tight specificaitons and tolerances. The only thing the RS engines have are parts that weigh in closer tolerance. The clearances, etc. are still street car tolerances and they are wide.

For instance, the weight tolerance on the connecting rods is 9g for street and 5g for RS. In a racing engine (including the 964 Cups) we balance everything within a few TENTHS of a Gram. There is no way I would run an engine with 5g weight differences to 8k like we do in the racing engines.
Old 03-19-2010, 05:51 PM
  #18  
N51
Rennlist Member
 
N51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: behind the Corn Curtain
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

GT2/EVO CAMS

That's what I running. 3.8l Promotive built.

Even with the tall 6th gear(/31), I can accelerate from 20mph,
and then skip sideways in first @ 20mph.
Old 03-19-2010, 06:00 PM
  #19  
Dave White
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Dave White's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cleveland area, Ohio
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All interesting stuff! I went to take pictures of my car in pieces today, here is the pitting on the cam. Many of the rockers had very slight wear, as did a few pins. This was probably due to infrequent valve adjustments by previous owners. My cylinders and pistons look good, so if anyone needs a set... I am now awaiting an updated estimate to see what else I can afford to do. The heads will be sent out and polished up, I also am sending out the injectors for rebuild and testing. Everything else in the engine compartment is also getting rebuilt or replaced.
Attached Images  
Old 03-19-2010, 09:56 PM
  #20  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

The pitting on the camshaft is common of what we've begun to see in these engines. The factory cams are fairly soft material. We use Chill Cast cores or billet steel blanks on the custom camshafts we do and they last much longer.

It probably isn't a result of a valve adjust, but rather oil change frequency or type of oil used.
Old 03-20-2010, 12:47 AM
  #21  
Dave White
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Dave White's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cleveland area, Ohio
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So, what type of oil are you guys recommending? I was running Mobile 1, 15w50, have used 10w30, but now am leery of lack of zinc zddp in the modern oils. Was considering going to conventional Brad Penn. I believe my builder will be using their break in oil when I get the car back.
Old 03-20-2010, 02:36 AM
  #22  
Paulie964
Rennlist Member
 
Paulie964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave White
So, what type of oil are you guys recommending? I was running Mobile 1, 15w50, have used 10w30, but now am leery of lack of zinc zddp in the modern oils. Was considering going to conventional Brad Penn. I believe my builder will be using their break in oil when I get the car back.

Fine yourself some oil with high ZDDP content. Guess the EPA banned it but it works much better on cams not running roller rockers. Zinc Dialkyl-Dithio-Phosphate helps reduce the wear ...
Old 03-20-2010, 07:15 AM
  #23  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
Technically speaking the 964 RS/Cup engines are not blueprinted. The parts for the engine are hand selected and have tighter tolerances in weight and sizing. If you simply install an RS ECU into your stock street car, you get the +13hp the RS engine has. So, yes, it is all the Motronic programming.
The one critical factor which really explains the real performance difference between an 964RS engine and a stock 964 is the static compression ratio. Most stock engines are built below the factory spec at 10.6 to 10.7:1, whereas all the RS engines that I have measured are in the 10.8 to 10.9:1 range; couple in with this specially selected components with tighter tolerances and it is as close to blueprinting as you can get from a factory production line.

Sure, the Motronic is different and with the RS ecu a standard car will make more power, however I have proven to myself many times that when you fit Motec to stock 964's and compare them to Motec on an RS, you also get 10hp more from the RS. If you then rebuild the 964, deck the heads and do a narrow valve seat job on the heads, you get your 10hp back.
Old 03-20-2010, 10:41 AM
  #24  
Dave White
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Dave White's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cleveland area, Ohio
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since the Mahles tend to be under spec on the compression, I was having the heads "decked" as well.
Old 06-03-2010, 10:11 PM
  #25  
92silver964
Racer
 
92silver964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
For a budget street car w/ stock Motronic you cant go to wild on the cams, I know several people w/ the 3.8RS hydraulic cams in 3.6, w/ a 3.8 it's an obvious choice. The mechanical equivalent of the 993RS is the SS cam which also works well

993 Super Sport(mechanical)
lift .490I/.456E
Advertized duration 260/248
duration at .050" 240/230

All of these grinds work well in the 3.6 litre and up engines and the choice depends on your mods and driving style.

I also recommend Steve Wong for a chip for these engines, he will work w/ you to get it right. I have several of his chips and am very happy w/ them.
Bill, I am about to make a decision on a cam upgrade while in the process of an engine rebuild (staying at 3.6L). I am leaning towards a 993SS grind of my original cams (currently looking at Dougherty). My usage is very similar to that of the original poster of this thread. Any further comments on this selection and the use of Dougherty? Also, are you saying that a tailored S Wong chip is required to suit this cam profile change? I sure appreciate your help. Thanks.



Quick Reply: Non stock cam users....



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:36 PM.