Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Power / torque predictions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2015, 05:42 AM
  #16  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

in need of more vids..
Old 05-26-2015, 05:50 AM
  #17  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default



Old 05-26-2015, 06:34 AM
  #18  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith


Your clock is wrong!!!
Old 05-26-2015, 07:20 AM
  #19  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Well not great, not the end of the world. They had the cam set quite retarded and moved it forwards 2 degrees at a time. Main issue at this stage is it won't make more than 24-25psi. So something is up. Will put in some pressure sensors and see what's going on. Perhaps a different housing or even turbo. X-over is 2.5" in diameter so it's larger than stock.
Attached Images  
Old 05-26-2015, 07:24 AM
  #20  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Well not great, not the end of the world. They had the cam set quite retarded and moved it forwards 2 degrees at a time. Main issue at this stage is it won't make more than 24-25psi. So something is up. Will put in some pressure sensors and see what's going on. Perhaps a different housing or even turbo. X-over is 2.5" in diameter so it's larger than stock.
Is the lower line torque or boost?

The GTX3582R is a few hundred HP away from being a bottle neck but you are using the 0,82 T3 housing right? Seems a bit odd that it wont make more than 24 25 psi when it made 25 psi with the 3.1l with more power!?

For what it's worth - I run a 2.25" crossover with my 1 7/8 primary headers.
Old 05-26-2015, 07:39 AM
  #21  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Something does look wrong.


It's not the turbo. Didn't someone else run a 2.5" crossover and ran into some backpressure issues?
Old 05-26-2015, 08:10 AM
  #22  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Lower line is boost. Increments of 5 psi per larger square. Yes it's the .82 housing. We didn't try boosting much over that previously. The 552whp hit a short peak of 25psi. I think we have to look at backpressure somewhere. Isn't the stock X-over 2" or is it 2.25"? This is larger than stock but may still be a bottleneck overall.
Old 05-26-2015, 08:19 AM
  #23  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Lower line is boost. Increments of 5 psi per larger square. Yes it's the .82 housing. We didn't try boosting much over that previously. The 552whp hit a short peak of 25psi. I think we have to look at backpressure somewhere. Isn't the stock X-over 2" or is it 2.25"? This is larger than stock but may still be a bottleneck overall.

I'm convinced the crossover is not the issue here.
I hit 514 rwhp with tiny stock headers and stock crossover pipe with the 0,82 housing. On my latest engine I'm using 4-1 headers with larger primariers with 2.25" crossover. You don't want volume in that pipe, you want velocity. Measure back pressure and if it is high change the turbine housing, not the x-over! You already have a larger crossover than me and I don't have these issues at 620 rwhp.
Old 05-26-2015, 08:36 AM
  #24  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Yes. No point in guessing until we know. Will be testing the car at the track on Thursday so that will give us a bit more of a real world assessment.
Old 05-26-2015, 09:52 AM
  #25  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Spooling very late. How much overlap on the cam?
Old 05-26-2015, 10:28 AM
  #26  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well I think the really encouraging thing here is that you have very little HP drop off all the way to 7,500 rpm and the drop you see is actually due to the drop in boost pressure. From the chart, it looks like you should even continue to make a little more HP even beyond 7,500 rpm once you have the boost issue fixed which is really impressive for an 8v.

I guess you've been down this road a few times now... I think it's probably just a little teething issue you'll get sorted out fairly quickly!
Old 05-26-2015, 10:57 AM
  #27  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

A wild guess perhaps, but maybe there is not enough exhaust flow to spin the turbo as much as required to build more than 25 psi, assuming the "high"-flowing top end... which could simply point us to a leak between headers and turbine - faulty wastegate?

If there was a problem with excessive back pressure then the hp curve would not look that good up top - we would need a high-flowing larger capacity engine to choke a GT35 0.82 hotside.
Old 05-26-2015, 11:20 AM
  #28  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
A wild guess perhaps, but maybe there is not enough exhaust flow to spin the turbo as much as required to build more than 25 psi, assuming the "high"-flowing top end... which could simply point us to a leak between headers and turbine - faulty wastegate?

If there was a problem with excessive back pressure then the hp curve would not look that good up top - we would need a high-flowing larger capacity engine to choke a GT35 0.82 hotside.
For the first theory that would create another type of boost curve. It would generate higher boost the higher the rpms and not a boost curve like this where it starts to fall off.

Maybe have the turbo checked or try another turbo if you have one available.
Old 05-26-2015, 11:45 AM
  #29  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
For the first theory that would create another type of boost curve. It would generate higher boost the higher the rpms and not a boost curve like this where it starts to fall off
Are you suggesting that an exhaust leak before the turbine should cause an increase in boost?
Old 05-26-2015, 11:47 AM
  #30  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Don't know if there is much to be gained by having the crossover that big, it'll give you more back pressure and slower spool I'd think,but you've got a big turbo there for a 2.5.


Quick Reply: Power / torque predictions?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:32 PM.