Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Interesting Race Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2013, 11:52 AM
  #16  
Peedster
Racer
 
Peedster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Seriously, isnt 70k for the Paul Miller GTR bargain of the century then with spares for a decade a 2 extra motors, original GTR gearbox and so on...

It was bumbed in october 2012 so it might still be out there...

The Fabcar GTR does look like its developed a bit more but the Miller car is probably a beast anyway!
Old 07-16-2013, 11:56 AM
  #17  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peedster
Seriously, isnt 70k for the Paul Miller GTR bargain of the century then with spares for a decade a 2 extra motors, original GTR gearbox and so on...

It was bumbed in october 2012 so it might still be out there...

The Fabcar GTR does look like its developed a bit more but the Miller car is probably a beast anyway!
I'm not familiar with the Paul Miller GTR.

As far as the Fabcar being more developed.... It is my understanding that Fabcar built all the GTR's.

TonyG
Old 07-16-2013, 12:23 PM
  #18  
Peedster
Racer
 
Peedster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Paul Miller Car might actually be a 924 GTR

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...ns-am-car.html
Old 07-16-2013, 01:26 PM
  #19  
chrenan
Three Wheelin'
 
chrenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,476
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peedster
Paul Miller Car might actually be a 924 GTR

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...ns-am-car.html
The engine is definitely not a 2.0 litre based 924 engine, that's a 944 2.5 in there. But there was a 924 GTR that ran a development engine based on the soon to arrive 944 2.5 wasn't there?
Old 07-16-2013, 04:45 PM
  #20  
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
theedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Maybe with some of that $120,000 he can buy a memory card that holds more than three pictures? And a keyboard to type a better description.
Old 07-16-2013, 05:02 PM
  #21  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,916
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

lol...you're not wrong Brian.
Old 07-16-2013, 09:34 PM
  #22  
Rick
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 3,018
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm puzzled how this could fit in any PCA class. Even GT classes require an "intact" Porsche chassis.
Old 07-17-2013, 01:36 AM
  #23  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,916
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

I get the impression that you 'run what you brung' in the desert!
Old 07-17-2013, 07:16 PM
  #24  
SoloRacer
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
SoloRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Some more info:

http://germancarsforsaleblog.com/1986-porsche-944-gtr/
Old 07-18-2013, 12:12 AM
  #25  
FrenchToast
Three Wheelin'
 
FrenchToast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 0
Received 77 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrenan
The engine is definitely not a 2.0 litre based 924 engine, that's a 944 2.5 in there. But there was a 924 GTR that ran a development engine based on the soon to arrive 944 2.5 wasn't there?
That was the one in 1981. I believe it was a 2.5 turbocharged 16V.

Originally Posted by theedge
Maybe with some of that $120,000 he can buy a memory card that holds more than three pictures? And a keyboard to type a better description.
I could be wrong, I think with a car like this you would contact and talk with the owner quite a bit before purchase. But yes, pictures are always nice.

Originally Posted by Rick
I'm puzzled how this could fit in any PCA class. Even GT classes require an "intact" Porsche chassis.
Yes but I think there are (or used to be) prototype classes above that. I'm not sure what the definition of 'chassis' is. Since I'm pretty sure suspension pick-up points and stuff are free, so what is a 'chassis' then?

Unless the rules have changed, it actually is not eligible because of the non-Porsche transmission. It has a Hewland, not a Getrag.

Awesome car. And agreed, for what it is, that is a ridiculous deal. For all of the time, testing, and parts that are in that car. Not to mention the history.

Take care,
Old 07-18-2013, 01:12 AM
  #26  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchToast
That was the one in 1981. I believe it was a 2.5 turbocharged 16V.



I could be wrong, I think with a car like this you would contact and talk with the owner quite a bit before purchase. But yes, pictures are always nice.



Yes but I think there are (or used to be) prototype classes above that. I'm not sure what the definition of 'chassis' is. Since I'm pretty sure suspension pick-up points and stuff are free, so what is a 'chassis' then?

Unless the rules have changed, it actually is not eligible because of the non-Porsche transmission. It has a Hewland, not a Getrag.

Awesome car. And agreed, for what it is, that is a ridiculous deal. For all of the time, testing, and parts that are in that car. Not to mention the history.

Take care,
I don't ever recall seeing where the transmission manufacturer was an issue in LB/HP class racing (example: GT classes). Additionally, no 924, 944, or 968 ever had a Porsche transmission. They were all made by Audi and were in fact slightly tweaked production Audi transmissions.

Typically these types of cars (tube frame cars in this case) would run in the highest class where the HP was unlimited. In POC it would be GT1. There are equivalent classes in PCA, NASA, etc...

The problem is that, at least in the POC, GT1 has 1000+ HP cars. And they are stupid fast.

TonyG
Old 07-19-2013, 02:27 AM
  #27  
azbanks
Freedom Enthusiast
Rennlist Member
 
azbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
And as far as the price goes.... $120k is nothing compared to what it cost to build mine.

TonyG
FIFY
Old 07-19-2013, 06:23 AM
  #28  
flipo
Racer
 
flipo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

unfortunatly for people like me who love to build/restore racecars, build cost and market value are not the same thing ! As much as i hate it the reality is that for a large (ignorant) majority its "just" a 944/68
Old 07-19-2013, 06:24 AM
  #29  
chrenan
Three Wheelin'
 
chrenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,476
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Sorry duplicate post.
Old 07-19-2013, 06:25 AM
  #30  
chrenan
Three Wheelin'
 
chrenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,476
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Sorry duplicate post.


Quick Reply: Interesting Race Car



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:49 AM.