Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Opinions on my GT3076R setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2013, 07:39 PM
  #76  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
I understand your point. To maximise your set up... try replacing the cat. it could have had it. clogged. It's a possibility. There's nothing wrong with changing the cat to a higher flowing one is there?

Or go back to the original headers. or both?
That should be an easy test at the dyno. Run the car with the downpipe and exhaust and then remove it. See what happens. I don't want to cut into this system, its too rare, unless ofcourse it is clogged up and restricting airflow.

Also, a restrictive Cat would glow orange when the car is running. This would be easy to see on the dyno.
Old 01-02-2013, 07:43 PM
  #77  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

things like the cat are made to be replaced. Im not to familier with US spec cars because the euros and most Aus cars where made to run leaded fuel so had no cat, just a resonator. But it should be the same cat as a 951?
Old 01-02-2013, 07:45 PM
  #78  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
things like the cat are made to be replaced. Im not to familier with US spec cars because the euros and most Aus cars where made to run leaded fuel so had no cat, just a resonator. But it should be the same cat as a 951?
The cat is much bigger. It looks like it is a higher flow unit. The diameter is bigger and it is shorter than a 951 cat. I just added a picture of the factory unit side by side with my setup.

Also, even though the 968 turbo S was designed to be able to be sold in US, it was never sold in US. It was a ROW car only. Selling it in US was under consideration but it never equated into any sales.
Old 01-02-2013, 09:17 PM
  #79  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

It probably is a higher flowing unit.
The only issue running on a dyno with no exhaust is that the restriction of the 2.5" is missing so the results would be invalid unless you can hook up a standard 951 exhaust and delete the cat.
Old 01-02-2013, 09:53 PM
  #80  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I would think the cat would start getting very hot if its clogged up. Also, we could do pre-cat and post-cat temp comparisons to see if there are restrictions.

If that is the cause of my issues, I will have to either swap the cat or have another one built to match this design.
The good part is, fabspeed is local to me. I would think they would also be able to test my setup for flow.

Another idea would be to have a good 951 cat setup available to slap on to test.
Old 01-02-2013, 10:08 PM
  #81  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If you can rule that out, Then you'll need to look somewhere else. The dyno seems like the turbo is chocking. but if that isn't a WOT run, you can't use it as a reference.

Before you test the exhaust, go get a WOT run on a dyno. log boost & afrs also.
Do a run with the airbox out for comparison. It might help spool better. Not saying if it helps to remove it, but it just will show you if there's an intake restriction which causes lag and loss of power.
Old 01-02-2013, 10:11 PM
  #82  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Paully, you have great suggestions and I will definitely try those out.
Old 01-02-2013, 11:26 PM
  #83  
86 951 Driver
Race Car
 
86 951 Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Were those turbo you are using used on the real Turbo 968?
Old 01-02-2013, 11:37 PM
  #84  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 86 951 Driver
Were those turbo you are using used on the real Turbo 968?
No, the original turbo is a k27 series turbo. Pretty sure it's a k27/8
Old 01-03-2013, 02:49 AM
  #85  
Dave W.
Burning Brakes
 
Dave W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 850
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Twin 2" pipes have the same flow area as a single 2.8" pipe which is plenty for 400hp unless there's a bottleneck somewhere along the way.
Old 01-03-2013, 05:14 AM
  #86  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
I would think the cat would start getting very hot if its clogged up. Also, we could do pre-cat and post-cat temp comparisons to see if there are restrictions.

If that is the cause of my issues, I will have to either swap the cat or have another one built to match this design.
The good part is, fabspeed is local to me. I would think they would also be able to test my setup for flow.

Another idea would be to have a good 951 cat setup available to slap on to test.
I would think you would want to be measuring pressure differentials as well, pre and post turbo and cat and IC for example etc...
Old 01-03-2013, 05:14 AM
  #87  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
No, the original turbo is a k27 series turbo. Pretty sure it's a k27/8
The S is a K26/?, while the RS is a K27/11.

Raj, I apologise if this is not what you want to hear, but I think you are chasing your tail. You want the car to be as original as possible but you won't replace a GT30, that will never work as it should with such a restricted exhaust, with a stock K27? I don't get it...
Old 01-03-2013, 06:15 AM
  #88  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
The S is a K26/?, while the RS is a K27/11.

Raj, I apologise if this is not what you want to hear, but I think you are chasing your tail. You want the car to be as original as possible but you won't replace a GT30, that will never work as it should with such a restricted exhaust, with a stock K27? I don't get it...

Thanks for the correction, i read somewhere it was a k27 series turbo in the S. ah well they may be wrong.
Old 01-03-2013, 06:16 AM
  #89  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

K26/8 in the S I believe.
Old 01-03-2013, 10:49 AM
  #90  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

944 Turbo S runs a k26/8


Quick Reply: Opinions on my GT3076R setup



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:29 AM.