Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Refresh951's Hybrid Ultra Stroker Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2012, 05:35 PM
  #61  
1987Porsche944WithRealLongName
Racer
 
1987Porsche944WithRealLongName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So if you were to just do an offset grind and not touch the bores how would that go? Would the change in displacement be too small to make it worth it? Would the pistons just not work with the bore coating?
Old 12-12-2012, 06:26 PM
  #62  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1987Porsche944WithRealLongName
So if you were to just do an offset grind and not touch the bores how would that go? Would the change in displacement be too small to make it worth it? Would the pistons just not work with the bore coating?

I have not looked at that. It may be possible to use the Mitsubishi rods with stock coated pistons. The rods would need to modified to take the stock wrist pin (0.945"). Not sure of the compression height on the stock pistons. Seems possible. I still like the idea of sleeves to improve reliability.
Old 12-12-2012, 07:49 PM
  #63  
Reimu
Drifting
 
Reimu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC Triad
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1987Porsche944WithRealLongName
So if you were to just do an offset grind and not touch the bores how would that go? Would the change in displacement be too small to make it worth it? Would the pistons just not work with the bore coating?
If my math is right (and it most likely isn't) that would be just at 2.7 liters not accounting for whatever modification is done to the pistons. Surely a performance increase.
Old 12-12-2012, 07:50 PM
  #64  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by URG8RB8
Patrick: That is a very long and disappointing story. Car has been in Oklahoma for nearly three years now! Finally back to LR this morning, maybe will have something soon. Don't really want to say much about this nightmare. I will post results once completed.
These special builds take a lot of patience. Good luck!
The following users liked this post:
TheStock (11-14-2022)
Old 12-13-2012, 11:32 AM
  #65  
CyCloNe!
Race Car
 
CyCloNe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Posts: 4,093
Received 121 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Of course if you didn't want to go crazy with horsepower you could always use the chevy pistons increase the pin size and use the stock rods. Of course you would have to bore the block, sleeve it and fill it. I think the chevy pins are what .92 and porshce pins .94. The down side is the rod torque limit is less than the mitsu forged rods. Stock rods are good for what like 400whp (475-500chp) or something?
Old 12-13-2012, 11:46 AM
  #66  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1987Porsche944WithRealLongName
So if you were to just do an offset grind and not touch the bores how would that go? Would the change in displacement be too small to make it worth it? Would the pistons just not work with the bore coating?
Originally Posted by refresh951
I have not looked at that. It may be possible to use the Mitsubishi rods with stock coated pistons. The rods would need to modified to take the stock wrist pin (0.945"). Not sure of the compression height on the stock pistons. Seems possible. I still like the idea of sleeves to improve reliability.
The Mitsu rods are nearly identical length to factory... So if you want to use stock pistons, then the pin height of the piston wouldn't allow for much of any offset grind. So, there would be no displacement increase from just using the Mitsu rods. Also, the rods would still need machined to accept the larger pin diameter of the factory piston (24mm, vs 22mm).

Originally Posted by CyCloNe!
Of course if you didn't want to go crazy with horsepower you could always use the chevy pistons increase the pin size and use the stock rods. Of course you would have to bore the block, sleeve it and fill it. I think the chevy pins are what .92 and porshce pins .94. The down side is the rod torque limit is less than the mitsu forged rods. Stock rods are good for what like 400whp (475-500chp) or something?
The stock pistons are going to go further than the stock rods. The single most stressed component in the engine is the connecting rod. And if you are only changing one thing - then the rod should be what you change.
Old 12-13-2012, 01:11 PM
  #67  
CyCloNe!
Race Car
 
CyCloNe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Posts: 4,093
Received 121 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
The Mitsu rods are nearly identical length to factory... So if you want to use stock pistons, then the pin height of the piston wouldn't allow for much of any offset grind. So, there would be no displacement increase from just using the Mitsu rods. Also, the rods would still need machined to accept the larger pin diameter of the factory piston (24mm, vs 22mm).



The stock pistons are going to go further than the stock rods. The single most stressed component in the engine is the connecting rod. And if you are only changing one thing - then the rod should be what you change.
So basically if you going for a cheaper budget build for increased power the one major beneficial component to replace would be the rods. Which wouldn't help displacement but would help horsepower potential?
Old 12-13-2012, 01:19 PM
  #68  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yep.
Old 12-13-2012, 01:34 PM
  #69  
CyCloNe!
Race Car
 
CyCloNe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Posts: 4,093
Received 121 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

well say you use stock pistons, mitsu rods, what other methods can you use to increase displacement or compression? Reason I ask is to gain better low end response without the needs for boring over and such. I've never built an engine but I am always interested learning new things.
Old 12-13-2012, 01:39 PM
  #70  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Not much ways to increase displacement without changing the pistons...
There are ways, but usually none more economical than Sid's approach.

I suppose you could get pistons meant to work with the stock bore and with a higher placed pin, and then offset grind the crank to match, which would give you added stroke and therefore increase displacement. But then you have to consider the cost of alusil compatible pistons vs sleeving and regular pistons.
Old 12-13-2012, 10:58 PM
  #71  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Slightly reduced stroke to 94.85 mm. This lowered CR to 8.0:1. I think it is going to take on the order of 23-24 psi to hit my goal of 550 rwhp.
Old 12-14-2012, 11:41 AM
  #72  
CyCloNe!
Race Car
 
CyCloNe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Posts: 4,093
Received 121 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by refresh951
Slightly reduced stroke to 94.85 mm. This lowered CR to 8.0:1. I think it is going to take on the order of 23-24 psi to hit my goal of 550 rwhp.
Shawn did you decide which turbo your going with on this build? I know in the first post you mentioned the GT3582R turbo, is that still in the plan?
Old 12-14-2012, 11:56 AM
  #73  
dnovak
Racer
 
dnovak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Erie Colorado
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I vote for a VNT
Old 12-14-2012, 09:00 PM
  #74  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CyCloNe!
Shawn did you decide which turbo your going with on this build? I know in the first post you mentioned the GT3582R turbo, is that still in the plan?
Pretty sure on the GT3583R at this point. Still looking at it and will make a final decision by the first of the year.
Old 12-15-2012, 06:37 PM
  #75  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Got the block back from the machine shop today, cleaned and fresh hone. Cleaned parts all day getting ready for re-assembly. Crank should be done in a few days.





Quick Reply: Refresh951's Hybrid Ultra Stroker Build



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:32 AM.