Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Smoke at idle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2011, 01:54 PM
  #46  
Crackership
Rennlist Member
 
Crackership's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zerMATT951
I've been entertaining the thought of adding a PCV valve as you describe so that I can get the 20 psi of vacuum that my intake manifold registers at idle. If that doesn't create enough vacuum through the turbo to drain excess oil, I don't know what will. As Dave suggests, I suspect that I still need to replace that turbo oil drain vacuum elbow to the AOS, I doubt it's sealing much at all right now, but it sure is a PITA to get to and replace!
You mean in/hg... right? 20psi would be about 40in/hg... which is a lot... near impossible I would think. What are you using to measure boost/vacuum?
Old 09-12-2011, 02:03 PM
  #47  
SirLapsalot
Pro
 
SirLapsalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 745
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crackership
You mean in/hg... right? 20psi would be about 40in/hg... which is a lot... near impossible I would think. What are you using to measure boost/vacuum?
Yes must be in/hg. I'm pretty sure 30in/hg is the "perfect vacuum" which is theoretical not actually possible if I remember correctly.
Old 09-12-2011, 02:24 PM
  #48  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
What hose size should be used when adding a PCV valve?
Will the small size of the usual vacuum hoses work?
Reason for these questions is that I have just fitted an AOS top from a 968 which features a vacuum line to the intake manifold.
Granted there will never be any pressure in this line on a NA 968, but when adding the blue/black check valve in this line on a 951, will that create enough vacuum when the engine is idling to avoid excessive crankcase pressure?

Old 09-12-2011, 02:32 PM
  #49  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

I am curious, do any of y'all have the breather set up from an '89 951? It had a small valve near the AOS (from the factory, its Item #2 and connects to teh top of the AOS. For those of us who have deleted the venturi mess, Lindsey sells a hose that replaces it nicely.
Attached Images  
Old 09-12-2011, 02:40 PM
  #50  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Scott, you may be refering to the valve dicussed here?

My understanding is that it should open when there is excessive pressure in the line, which may happen when the recirculating valve opens (as throttle is being closed).
However, as the standard AFM/air box set up represents a higher flow restriction than the typical cone filter/MAF pipe set up, this valve may open only when using the AFM/air box set up. There might never be enough pressure build up in this line on a car using a MAF pipe/cone filter.
Old 09-12-2011, 03:00 PM
  #51  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Yep, thats the one I was referring to. I am not sure I entirely agree with the assessment that the valve wouldn't open up when running a MAF/cone filter set up. I am fairly well convinced that if you are getting positive crankcase pressure, that valve should open up from the pressure coming from the AOS, regardless of what the MAF/cone filter is doing and it *should* solve the problem. My question is, are any of the folks having this issue running that set up?

Lindsey sells a hose that replicates the control line fitting that runs from the top of the AOS to the inlet boot with a fitting for the check valve. Its not cheap (approx $60) but I think it the right direction to look in.
Old 09-12-2011, 03:01 PM
  #52  
zerMATT951
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
zerMATT951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Cowtown, TX
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crackership
You mean in/hg... right? 20psi would be about 40in/hg... which is a lot... near impossible I would think. What are you using to measure boost/vacuum?
You're right - it must be in/hg. I'm using my aftermarket VDO boost/vacuum gauge that registers something like 30 vacuum to like 25-30 pressure. I always assumed PSI, but in/hg is more likely.

Oh, and I guess I should definitely do the vacuum cleaner test before running any new hoses... I wonder if my 5hp shop vac would create too much vacuum in the crankcase?
Old 09-12-2011, 03:09 PM
  #53  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Hi Scott,

The issue is related to not having enough vacuum pulled on the crankcase. vs. relieving excess crankcase pressure.. The crankcase requires vacuum! The factory air box creates enough restriction in front of the turbo, which translates to negative pressure or vacuum. When going to a free flowing intake, like a MAF + Cone filter, the vacuum in front of the turbo is reduced. The lack of vacuum is very pronounced at idle, which can cause problems..
When the turbo is spooling, it creates enough suction to help siphon out the crankcase...

By adding a PCV system to operate at idle, we are basically re-introducing vacuum (which was lost when the factory airbox was removed). This PCV system operates only under no boost conditions.
The stock crankcase vent system must remain in place, which operates mainly under boost.

Some cars need the PCV while others do not. It depends on how much crankcase pressure there is in the particular engine.


Originally Posted by sh944
Yep, thats the one I was referring to. I am not sure I entirely agree with the assessment that the valve wouldn't open up when running a MAF/cone filter set up. I am fairly well convinced that if you are getting positive crankcase pressure, that valve should open up from the pressure coming from the AOS, regardless of what the MAF/cone filter is doing and it *should* solve the problem. My question is, are any of the folks having this issue running that set up?

Lindsey sells a hose that replicates the control line fitting that runs from the top of the AOS to the inlet boot with a fitting for the check valve. Its not cheap (approx $60) but I think it the right direction to look in.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 09-12-2011, 03:15 PM
  #54  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Gotcha, thanks for clarifying! Thom, my apologies for being too thick headed today to read what you were correctly saying the first time.
Old 09-12-2011, 03:28 PM
  #55  
minho78
Burning Brakes
 
minho78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eric951turbo
Here is my smoke. Sorry for my english accent : )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAGlyKrBRLU
I see blue and white smoke.
Old 09-12-2011, 03:41 PM
  #56  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Scott, you are welcome, it took me a long time to understand how this breather system works, and I still have this issue with smoking at idle!

Thanks John for the proper explanation, and what do you think about using a small vacuum line plugged into the AOS top? As I tend to mix up air flow with vacuum in my head, I'm not sure what to expect with such a set up.
Old 09-12-2011, 04:28 PM
  #57  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Using the AOS top is one option, however it does complicate things a bit.
The size of the hose is dictated by the size of the PCV and the one way valve. Using vacuum just by itself off the manifold is not a good approach, the air flow must be regulated by the PCV itself. The activation of the new PCV is handled by the one-way valve, as it will have a internal spring to regulate at what pressure the valve is open.

Another item to deal with is air entering the intake through the crankcase vs. through the TB. Not a big deal, but something to deal with..

As you can tell, there are many variables to deal with. As simple as adding a PCV + hose is, it must work as part of the existing system or it will have side effects...



Originally Posted by Thom
Scott, you are welcome, it took me a long time to understand how this breather system works, and I still have this issue with smoking at idle!

Thanks John for the proper explanation, and what do you think about using a small vacuum line plugged into the AOS top? As I tend to mix up air flow with vacuum in my head, I'm not sure what to expect with such a set up.
Old 09-12-2011, 04:48 PM
  #58  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Thanks.

I am not sure why it would even be needed to use an aftermarket PCV in addition, as the standard blue/black check valve fills the one-way function already by itself...?

- Engine running under vacuum in the intake = one-way valve open, intake pulling pressure from the crankcase (if there is too much pressure being pulled from the crankcase then another one-way valve can be put between the turbo and the AOS so that the turbo won't pull any pressure at all when the engine is running under vacuum. Eg the standard one-way valve between the brake booster and the intake manifold can be used there)

- Engine running under boost = one-way valve closed, turbo pulling pressure from the crankcase.
Old 09-12-2011, 05:47 PM
  #59  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikjel
After some testing on my car and on my friends completely stock 951, I found out that his stock 951 had a very slight vacuum in the cranckase at idle,
Mikjel, what was the actual value of the vacuum you measured?
Old 09-12-2011, 06:39 PM
  #60  
mikjel
Advanced
 
mikjel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
What hose size should be used when adding a PCV valve?
Will the small size of the usual vacuum hoses work?
In my case I needed only a very slight vacuum from the intake manifold to the cranckase. I use a thin hose which I made restrictions in to keep the air flow as low as possible. I put two pcv-valves (opening in one direction and closing the other direction) in series to be sure I will not get boost pressure in the crankcase.
This is air entering the intake without going through the MAF (air not being "measured") and turbo (not spinning it - not good for draining), so it is best to keep the air flow at absolute minimum. For me it solved the problem with smoke at idle comlpletely, but I am still having some smoke on trackdriving and higher oil consumption than before I mounted the new turbo + maf. Do you ever see any smoke when driving Thom, and how is your oil consumption?

Lots of european and japanese cars have PCV-systems like this. I mounted a pcv-valve from a volvo v40 turbo and a "one way check valve" (from a hardware store) in series on my car. Two valves are safer than one..

Originally Posted by Thom
I find zero info on what crankcase pressure/vacuum should be!
+1

Originally Posted by Thom
Reason for these questions is that I have just fitted an AOS top from a 968 which features a vacuum line to the intake manifold.
Granted there will never be any pressure in this line on a NA 968, but when adding the blue/black check valve in this line on a 951, will that create enough vacuum when the engine is idling to avoid excessive crankcase pressure?
I think it will! I did not know the 968 had a hose / aos top like that.

Originally Posted by sh944
YMy question is, are any of the folks having this issue running that set up?
Yes, my car has this valve. I think you must have lots of leakdown to open this valve (really high cranckase pressure).

Originally Posted by Thom
Mikjel, what was the actual value of the vacuum you measured?
I did not measure it. The vacuum was very low, not easy/possible to feal with my hand when I held it over the oil filler hole with the cap off. I "measured it" by holding a piece of a thin plastic bag over the oil filler hole. I could see that the plastic was sucked down on my friends stock setup (vacuum) and pushed up on my car with maf setup (positive pressure).

Last edited by mikjel; 09-12-2011 at 06:58 PM.


Quick Reply: Smoke at idle



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:57 AM.