Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

busy weekend, twin scroll vs stock crossover data, maf voltage etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2011, 10:40 PM
  #1  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default busy weekend, twin scroll vs stock crossover data, maf voltage etc

Ok so I finally got time to sort some things out and collect some data regarding the twin scroll and stock crossover pressure measurements. During this time I measured the MAF voltage (Ford Lightning MAF) to log the airflow differences.

Parts: HX 35 with a t4 .48 hotside, fairly stock engine on E85.

Initially (couple weeks ago) I also had a leak in the vacuum line going to my BOV so the turbo was working overtime and creating more crossover pressure. When this was happening I had close to 60 psi at 20 psi MAP. I even saw 50 psi at 15 psi MAP. The max voltage I saw out of the MAF at that point was less than 4v. That equated to 315 hp no matter whether the pressure was 15 psi or 25. What this resulted in was a crappy dyno session!!

With that fixed and the twin scroll I was seeing 58 psi at 30 psi MAP. I saw about 52 at 25 psi. NOT good!!! The MAF voltage at 30-31 MAP psi was around 4.3. Basically the highest I could get it to go. without running even more boost.

Now I re-installed the stock crossover and started logging. What I saw was 40 psi at 27psi MAP. My MAF voltage was 4.4v and this was even at lower MAP pressure (26psi). That doesn't sound like much but from my understanding regarding the MAF curve the difference between 4.0v(320hp) and 4.3v is a 33% increase in airflow so 4.4 is probably a little more than 420 hp. I'll have to put it on a dyno to verify. It may be far greater or less.

What I do know is that the responsiveness of the twin scroll is better. I could literally rev it in nuetral and make 10 psi free revving. I cannot do that now.

What I have learned is that you can put too big of a pipe between the header and the turbo. What I think happens is the exhaust gas slows down and expands and then becomes more difficult to get through the nozzle of the turbine housing. This was discussed in another thread. In my case the pipes were 2". I will probably reduce the pipe size to a more appropriate size and try it again.

My next step is to add a larger TB along with the custom intake and a larger IC. I will then take a MAF measurement to see what the diffence is. Next will be a Holset HX40 with a .58 open hotside. I may also try to build a larger exhaust in the mean time too.

My goal is to get 4.4v out of the MAF at 25 psi MAP.

PS; I cannot figure out how to do a screen shot off my laptop to show the logs. If I can figure it out I'll post them

Anyway it has been a fun weekend.
Old 05-08-2011, 10:42 PM
  #2  
Dougs951
Rennlist Member
 
Dougs951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Little button near the top right should say prt sc or print screen.

press that, go in to MSpaint and paste.

Oh and I love 30 psi on a "fairly stock engine"
Old 05-08-2011, 10:59 PM
  #3  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thanks
Old 05-08-2011, 11:13 PM
  #4  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ahh..I see. 2" pipe to each side of the twin scroll. (Two, 2" pipes) Lets see. The area of Two 2" pipes is the same as... (googling area of a circle calcutators) a single 2.8" diameter up pipe. I used a 2.5" up pipe. It did well, but the percentage of area from a 2.8" up pipe to a 2.5" up pipe might not sound like much but it's actually pretty large!.. as evidenced.... 2.8" has (6.25 sq. inches) and a 2.5" pipe only has 4.91 sq. inches. for a difference of ... 22% more flow through the 2.8" pipe!!!! - Or in this case, SLOWER flow. Turbo math is fun.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:13 PM
  #5  
gregeast
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
gregeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado USA
Posts: 2,911
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Good stuff Sid.

Just for clarification, the comparison was between your custom twin scroll crossover vs. the stock (non-twin scroll) crossover, both with the same turbo, correct?
Old 05-08-2011, 11:28 PM
  #6  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Greg yes same turbo.

Bruce, Yeah In hindsight I wish I would have done some better research before building the pipes. It would have been so much easier to use smaller pipes. Lesson learned about assumptions!!

here are a couple screenshots.Nevermind the data on the rh side of one of them as I would not let me add the new image to paint unless I copied it. The little boxes are teh correct data for the curser position

Yes ..I understand it is running lean in the upper rpms. It may be the pump. We are working on it right now.



Old 05-08-2011, 11:34 PM
  #7  
m73m95
Nordschleife Master
 
m73m95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 7,100
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95ONE
Ahh..I see. 2" pipe to each side of the twin scroll. (Two, 2" pipes) Lets see. The area of Two 2" pipes is the same as... (googling area of a circle calcutators) a single 2.8" diameter up pipe. I used a 2.5" up pipe. It did well, but the percentage of area from a 2.8" up pipe to a 2.5" up pipe might not sound like much but it's actually pretty large!.. as evidenced.... 2.8" has (6.25 sq. inches) and a 2.5" pipe only has 4.91 sq. inches. for a difference of ... 22% more flow through the 2.8" pipe!!!! - Or in this case, SLOWER flow. Turbo math is fun.
Expanding on the math a little bit...

Two 1 3/4" pipes have the same area(ish) as the single 2.5" crossover....



With the HX40, maybe you'll need the extra flow of your larger pipes?? What size is your wastegate? Talking with Josh (I'm sure you've had the same talk with him), a MUCH larger wastegate would probably help your problem as well...
Old 05-08-2011, 11:39 PM
  #8  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944

My goal is to get 4.4v out of the MAF at 25 psi MAP.

PS; I cannot figure out how to do a screen shot off my laptop to show the logs. If I can figure it out I'll post them

Anyway it has been a fun weekend.
Hit print screen key then go to paint and paste. Then save as jpg file. You can also paste in word.

Ideal gas law applies. Pressure*Volume =nr* Temperature where nr are constants. SO

P=T/V so as V goes up, P goes down with the temp being constant. Lower P, lower turbine speed.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:41 PM
  #9  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

any idea why it will keep pasting the same thing even if you have opened a new doc and hit print screen again?
Old 05-08-2011, 11:42 PM
  #10  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Finding data on twin scroll set ups or head-turbo pipe size generally is not too easy to find, results do not always follow 'theory'.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:44 PM
  #11  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Mark, I'll try it again once I put the other turbo on. To be honest the only way I can see it working would be due to the larger hotside.

It is a 44mm wg. It doesn't seem to be having any boost creep at all with either setup.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:44 PM
  #12  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
any idea why it will keep pasting the same thing even if you have opened a new doc and hit print screen again?
Sounds like the paste buffer isn't being cleared. Does it do it in paint too? Do a search on "How To Clear The Contents Of The Clipboard" for the operating system and office package you have. There have been bugs.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:45 PM
  #13  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thingo
Finding data on twin scroll set ups or head-turbo pipe size generally is not too easy to find, results do not always follow 'theory'.
LOL..... I fully agree and thanks for the idea of excessive crossover pressure in the first place.
Old 05-08-2011, 11:46 PM
  #14  
blown 944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Broderick
Sounds like the paste buffer isn't being cleared. Does it do it in paint too?
Thats teh one I was trying to use. vI guess I could shut down and start over and repaste but at this point it doesn't matter too much
Old 05-09-2011, 05:28 AM
  #15  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I think it's just a basic bottle neck in effect Sid.
Thanks for taking the time to do all this and post results.
Pretty sure a larger hotside didn't alleviate the situation for Rod but I'm sure he'll chime in again.


Quick Reply: busy weekend, twin scroll vs stock crossover data, maf voltage etc



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:40 AM.