When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Don't mind the haters lol. Cool idea, I say go with it. That motor is not known to be "problematic" under boost anymore than any other engine out there. HPA makes quite a lot of products for that motor also, though they are quite expensive.
Don't mind the haters lol. Cool idea, I say go with it. That motor is not known to be "problematic" under boost anymore than any other engine out there. HPA makes quite a lot of products for that motor also, though they are quite expensive.
+1....I wouldn't say it would be cheaper/more reliable than the normal 2.5 But if you want to be different, then go for the swap. Pros and cons to both motors.
If a few people made VR6 swapped cars, that would be cool.... but obviously there isn't a demand for a VR6 kit, no matter how much you try to sell the idea. Save yourself the headache.
Ummmm.... Not that i should be pointing the finger but isnt that EXACTLY what everyone said about the SBC Swap just a few years ago...
Mark
...Back to cleaing the valve covers for my LS1 Swap...
My friends insight drag car with a K24A1 that runs on methanol doesn't even make that much HP.
it was a typo. i already corrected him.
Originally Posted by 944CS
No the dry sump is because the company who is helping sees potential in a dry sump kit for this motor in this chassis. It will more than likely run first wet sump.
Ok i can understand that. How are you planning on adapting the engine to the torque tube?