Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

16v head with 8v pistons can it be done?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2010, 08:52 AM
  #31  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

None, "GT30R" is the old name for the GT3076R.
Don't go for anything larger than 0,82 a/r T3 hotside if you want good response.

If you aren't looking for anything more than 400 crank hp a GT3071R with 0,63 a/r T3 would do the job with an insane response.

I'm running a GT3582R with 0,82 a/r T3 turbine housing - a true 600-650 hp turbo - and still reach my max boost (currently only 0,6 bar) at 3000 rpm or lower.
Old 07-02-2010, 08:55 AM
  #32  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well a gt3076 is a gt30 your just given a little more info ..the size of the compressor so a gt30 is gt3071 or a gt3076
another turbo wich i think is worth wile is a GT3576 wich is a rough truck turbo kicking around cheap every where..
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...ochargers.html
Old 07-02-2010, 09:29 AM
  #33  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke

If you aren't looking for anything more than 400 crank hp a GT3071R with 0,63 a/r T3 would do the job with an insane response.
Wouldn't you run the risk of too much backpressure with that small a turbo on a 3L 16v motor though Duke?
Old 07-02-2010, 10:39 AM
  #34  
nick_968
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
nick_968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Just to be clear, the turbo discusion we have moved onto from my point of view is based on my current 8v setup as that is where I am headed in the short term. Especially as there is no clear conscensus on being able to use my 8v pistons it is unlikely I will go 16v this year.

The turbo I looked at was basically this one below as when I checked the compressor map for my engine it seemed to be the best match. Still undecided if its worth the extra work to go to full garret turbo.

http://www.034motorsport.com/turboch...rbo-p-107.html

Using a 0.63 A/R
Old 07-02-2010, 10:41 AM
  #35  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Wouldn't you run the risk of too much backpressure with that small a turbo on a 3L 16v motor though Duke?
Not for as low as 400 crank hp. It's still bigger than most of the KKK hybrids people used to run in the old days. Running a turbo with more capacity than needed is just a waste of performance.
Old 07-02-2010, 10:43 AM
  #36  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nick_968
Just to be clear, the turbo discusion we have moved onto from my point of view is based on my current 8v setup as that is where I am headed in the short term. Especially as there is no clear conscensus on being able to use my 8v pistons it is unlikely I will go 16v this year.

The turbo I looked at was basically this one below as when I checked the compressor map for my engine it seemed to be the best match. Still undecided if its worth the extra work to go to full garret turbo.

http://www.034motorsport.com/turboch...rbo-p-107.html

Using a 0.63 A/R
That turbo won't bolt on. The problem is the GTBB center section which is too narrow.
Old 07-02-2010, 10:46 AM
  #37  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Be aware that map is not the same as the gt3076 that garret sell now here, I would expect they changed it for good reason.
Old 07-02-2010, 10:48 AM
  #38  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hmm so does that mean the back of the comp cover will foul on the engine mount ?
so more than a little grinding on the mount ?
Old 07-02-2010, 10:57 AM
  #39  
nick_968
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
nick_968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

What is required to bolt up the true GT30 (3076) thingo mentioned above then?
Old 07-02-2010, 11:04 AM
  #40  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I've got a gt3071 on my 951(same centre section as gt3076). A lot of work was required on the mount.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:18 AM
  #41  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

grinding and a spacer or cut it off and make a new one ?
Old 07-02-2010, 11:22 AM
  #42  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Yea mostly that and swearing, the tial mount might be a better option.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:23 AM
  #43  
nick_968
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
nick_968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

No mods to the crossover or downpipe?
Old 07-02-2010, 11:23 AM
  #44  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Nick, your turbo dates back to 2004, it's totally different than the newer S5 others refer to. The newer S5 is making 1bar boost at 3000RPM and putting down close to 500/500 at the wheel at higher boost.
However, others who ran similar turbo to the one you have, reported much better spoolup than you have experienced.

Many things affect the spoolup: Any exhaust leak or restriction before the turbo, boost control, tuning, camshaft, restriction in front of the turbo.... As a example, we did a aggressive perf. cam swap and recorded the before and after spoolup. Spoolup was delayed, the power band was shifted to the right, power gains were noticed up top.


The turbo you have can be easily modified to reduce spoolup by around 300-400rpm (and will reduce the top end potential, which you are not after), it's a simple part swap you can perform yourself. Someone recently made this change, even though the turbo was not a good match to the engine size, on a 2.5L they were seeing 1bar boost at 3400-3500RPM in 4th gear.

Since 2004 there are many new offerings on the market. A smaller turbo will give you better spoolup, in some cases you will need to run higher boost. For 400bhp, there are many options. A GT30R on a 3L will spoolup nicely, but will not be a direct bolt-on.

If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 07-02-2010, 11:29 AM
  #45  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Mine is a twin scroll turbo, mostly everything is custom, it involved a lot of work.


Quick Reply: 16v head with 8v pistons can it be done?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:15 AM.