What do you think of these ramps???
#1
What do you think of these ramps???
I need to do a clutch job and I hate jackstands. Anybody try anything like this.
Materials would be cheap.
http://www.corvettec3.ca/ramps.htm
Dom
Materials would be cheap.
http://www.corvettec3.ca/ramps.htm
Dom
#2
I think that is a brilliant solution the way they are constructed they could be stood on the end and used as shelves .
i would go for 4 boxes that can clip together to form what there is there but go on top of each other to hold the car on its belly wheels hanging ...
i would consider good pallets and good timber shipping boxes for material as well .
I think its a great idea as you will easy find another use for the boxes later
i would go for 4 boxes that can clip together to form what there is there but go on top of each other to hold the car on its belly wheels hanging ...
i would consider good pallets and good timber shipping boxes for material as well .
I think its a great idea as you will easy find another use for the boxes later
#3
Rennlist Member
Sweet idea. Beats the hell out of trying to jack up the car in the garage next to another project car you don't want to scratch, and having to put it on jackstands.
Unfortunately I think I would need about 20 feet of gradually inclining ramps to clear both of my extremely low cars.
Unfortunately I think I would need about 20 feet of gradually inclining ramps to clear both of my extremely low cars.
#4
Rennlist Member
I agree the nose to ground clearance is not very high on the 944. I tried something like this on my lowerd NA and had to restack alot of wood before i got there. I may try to build a new one in future though. Thank you for posting the link
#7
Rennlist Member
what about termites!!!
that looks like a case insurances companys would not pay off on???
Mike
that looks like a case insurances companys would not pay off on???
Mike
Trending Topics
#9
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nuke City, NM
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are pretty neat! I have a little bit of trouble trusting wood with that load, though... Guess it just depends how much of a carpenter you consider yourself!
#10
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also think that it's an accident waiting to happen. I would be really carefull with these home ideas, and I heard of people dying under their cars. 10 years ago I had a Jack give up on me and thank god I had jack stands.
#11
So the 2x6 or 2x8 can support even more at the 2' height. I think its safe but make sure everything is square and driving on it would be the dangerous part.
#12
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
i think some more substantial platforms would make it ok.
when i had my car apart in 05 i had it up on 4 blocks 12" high, made up of 4x6 beams nailed and glued together
car was pretty solid up there. i imagine you could make a similar type of block and then actually use another full beam to support the weight
when i had my car apart in 05 i had it up on 4 blocks 12" high, made up of 4x6 beams nailed and glued together
car was pretty solid up there. i imagine you could make a similar type of block and then actually use another full beam to support the weight
#13
Hey Man
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I think they are probably just safe as any jackstands but they limit what tasks can be done somewhat (i.e. no wheel or suspension work). I would get claustrophobic though working under there. It also makes it nearly impossible to access the engine bay from above if needed.
#14
To enlighten you all. A single 2x4 stud (typical Lowes Lumber) at 10-12' can support a vertical force of 1000 lbs.
So the 2x6 or 2x8 can support even more at the 2' height. I think its safe but make sure everything is square and driving on it would be the dangerous part.
So the 2x6 or 2x8 can support even more at the 2' height. I think its safe but make sure everything is square and driving on it would be the dangerous part.
The lumber "load rating" is not the issue - inappropriate application is.
You cannot build a wood bridge for example based on static lumber "load rating".
The OSB/plywood sides will begin to wallow out screw holes - or god forbid nails. Then there is the issue of expose to liquids (oil, antifreeze, water, etc) OSB.Plywood will swell and begin to come apart. There is also an issue of leaving a car on it for any extended period of time.....
show car display is the only application I see that makes any sense, working under such a structure is asinine
#15
Except for one oversight - the side cover OSB are taking all the load to keep the lumber perpendicular.... every time your drive on and off, the loads try to collapse the structure.......
The lumber "load rating" is not the issue - inappropriate application is.
You cannot build a wood bridge for example based on static lumber "load rating".
The OSB/plywood sides will begin to wallow out screw holes - or god forbid nails. Then there is the issue of expose to liquids (oil, antifreeze, water, etc) OSB.Plywood will swell and begin to come apart. There is also an issue of leaving a car on it for any extended period of time.....
show car display is the only application I see that makes any sense, working under such a structure is asinine
The lumber "load rating" is not the issue - inappropriate application is.
You cannot build a wood bridge for example based on static lumber "load rating".
The OSB/plywood sides will begin to wallow out screw holes - or god forbid nails. Then there is the issue of expose to liquids (oil, antifreeze, water, etc) OSB.Plywood will swell and begin to come apart. There is also an issue of leaving a car on it for any extended period of time.....
show car display is the only application I see that makes any sense, working under such a structure is asinine
Are you a structural engineer? If not, you are guessing. Wood can support a locomotive so the material is not an issue. I don't see how a litttle oil or water would affect the structure. Also,leaving a load on for an extented period of time will not damage the structure if it is built correctly. The real issue is structural integrity and I guess I want some kind of professional opinion just to be sure. Thanks for the input.