Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

SFR Intercooler and temps...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2009, 01:58 AM
  #16  
seattle951
Pro
 
seattle951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 569
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If he is driving in stop and go traffic, there is no turbo boost and the only difference the intercooler is making is not taking away from the efficiency of the radiator, right?

The particular SFR unit has been on my list of things to add. I was looking for a good recommendation before making the investment. I would be interested in more feedback.
Old 09-06-2009, 02:27 AM
  #17  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
simply more air available to flow through the ic than in the stock location, and the larger surface area and better design of the sfr unit bring air temps down further which directly affects cylinder/coolant temp.



good deal.
Nope.

What Tom is saying is that he is not seeing an increase in radiator cooling temps, as a result of the placement of the IC. No more and no less.
At speed he is seeing an increase in power, due to the efficiency of the IC, however he is not seeing this increase at the cost of additional coolant temps.

PERIOD.

No more and no less.

It's a common perception, sometimes accurate and sometimes not, that the placement of a vastly larger IC, in front of other cooling devices, such as oil coolers, radiators and A/C condensors, blocks the air flow to the other components, compromising their respective functions and efficiencies.
In Tom's case, the IC, in it's current position, creates more power without any measurable loss of function or efficiency, of the other three components.


There is no more to his point.
Old 09-06-2009, 02:31 AM
  #18  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

ohhh.

so the sfr unit is efficient enough to bring IAT down bigtime (yay power) yet does not provide a significant restriction to the radiator which keeps everything nice and chilly.


sounds like a well-designed product.
Old 09-06-2009, 02:40 AM
  #19  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Exactly.
Old 09-06-2009, 02:48 AM
  #20  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Old 09-06-2009, 10:06 AM
  #21  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Whoa...a stock oil cooler? In a build like yours?

Please reconsider that - especailly it you ever track it! The stock oil cooler is not really good enough for a stock engine on the track - your beast would really cook the oil!
Old 09-06-2009, 11:37 AM
  #22  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Stop and go traffic is a good test. However, you are not under boost to heat up the IC and you are not loading the cooling system by the extra heat generated by high engine load. A second good test will be a test with logged data under track conditions.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 09-06-2009, 12:34 PM
  #23  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

To clarify, I was only reporting that the car did not heat up in normal (harsh) street driving -- did not mean to suggest the car was running cooler as a result of the intercooler, just not hotter. I logged temps with the stock intercooler, and it did a pretty good job of bringing the boosted temps down, at least on the street with cruising time between WOT to overcome heat soak. Once I get sensor ports in the new pipes, I'll do some comparisons. I was not able to measure the pressure drop on the stock intercooler, but if the SFR is contributing to more power, I suspect that's the more likely source on my car.
Old 09-06-2009, 12:42 PM
  #24  
SamGrant951
Race Director
 
SamGrant951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 10,861
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Im surprised that you still have a stock oil cooler as well. What are you seeing for oil temps currently?
Old 09-06-2009, 12:59 PM
  #25  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SamGrant951
Im surprised that you still have a stock oil cooler as well. What are you seeing for oil temps currently?
No oil temp gauge for me yet. I have a drain plug sender somewhere -- maybe I'll hook it up...
Old 09-06-2009, 01:22 PM
  #26  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
Whoa...a stock oil cooler? In a build like yours?

Please reconsider that - especailly it you ever track it! The stock oil cooler is not really good enough for a stock engine on the track - your beast would really cook the oil!
Originally Posted by SamGrant951
Im surprised that you still have a stock oil cooler as well. What are you seeing for oil temps currently?
whats so wrong with it? or does the oil just get too hot under heavy load going through the turbo?
Old 09-06-2009, 03:47 PM
  #27  
SamGrant951
Race Director
 
SamGrant951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 10,861
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I guess nothing if its doing its job and the car is just driven on the street. I know my 300hp turbo would hit 230ish in stop and go traffic, 190ish on the highway and 270+ on track. I put a front mount Setrab in it earlier this year and Im not sure if its even cracked 200 in traffic on a hot day, it sits much lower on the highway. Havent tracked it yet but am looking forward to seeing the difference. I have my sender in the return line banjo fitting in the pan.
Old 09-06-2009, 04:54 PM
  #28  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

i wonder what kind of temps ill be seeing on my NA once i get the 951 cooler on there, it really needs it up here in the desert. even just cruising the highway in moderate traffic the coolant temp gets super hot which makes my oil pressure drop to like 3bar at 3000RPM which is scary...
Old 09-06-2009, 07:00 PM
  #29  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,917
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Also the size, depth, and coarseness of the i/c has a lot to do with it's efficiency and it's ability to flow through. I would guess that my temps in day to day driving have gone from on the first line to a mm over it with my fmic. The guy that did my one out here was very clear on the difference in quality / design of the core and how much of an effect that can have.
Tom, do you still run your a/c as well?
Old 09-06-2009, 08:04 PM
  #30  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Yes, in fact on Friday during the long ugly drive, I actually used the a/c most of the time. I understand from Tim the core is Spearco.



Quick Reply: SFR Intercooler and temps...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:50 AM.