Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Fast Response IAT for intercooler temps?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2009, 01:03 AM
  #1  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default Fast Response IAT for intercooler temps?

Well, I tried data logging in/out intercooler temps today using standard GM "fast response" IAT sensors, but was disappointed by the response time of the sensors. Can anyone suggest sensors for this purpose that can react real-time to intake temp changes? Anyone try bosch NTC M8-F ?
Old 06-15-2009, 01:52 AM
  #2  
jlturpin
Rennlist Member
 
jlturpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mayflower, AR
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am not sure if this is the open element GM sensor, but the Open sensor is what was recommend to me. I have not installed it yet so I can't give you any real world feedback.
Old 06-15-2009, 02:54 AM
  #3  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Where have you located the sensors Tom?
Old 06-15-2009, 03:40 AM
  #4  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The NTC M8-F is most likely very good, but I would start with the Bosch 0 280 130 085 sensor. Commonly used to measure IAT in turbocharged engines.
I use it myself and I cannot read any lag in my datalogs.
Old 06-15-2009, 03:55 AM
  #5  
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
theedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This would probably work for you.

http://kb.ls1gto.com/KB/article.aspx?id=10279
Old 06-15-2009, 11:33 AM
  #6  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Where have you located the sensors Tom?
I intalled them into a spare set of stock i/c pipes. One in each pipe for before and after temps.
Old 06-15-2009, 11:35 AM
  #7  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
The NTC M8-F is most likely very good, but I would start with the Bosch 0 280 130 085 sensor. Commonly used to measure IAT in turbocharged engines.
I use it myself and I cannot read any lag in my datalogs.
Thanks, I'll check that out. How do you mount them though -- they appear to be designed to plug into a port of some kind, rather than screwing in to a threaded port.
Old 06-15-2009, 11:40 AM
  #8  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlturpin
I am not sure if this is the open element GM sensor, but the Open sensor is what was recommend to me. I have not installed it yet so I can't give you any real world feedback.
That's what I have I believe. Several places seem to recommend them for this, so maybe I am doing something wrong. Only thing I can think is that perhaps the response time is better when the temperature variation is smaller. I tested it in the pipe, going from ambient of about 70 degrees (F) to whatever my hair dryer was putting out. Doing that, it took many seconds for the signal to adjust to the new temp -- like 5 to 10 seconds... which seemed much slower than I expected.
Old 06-15-2009, 11:43 AM
  #9  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Thanks, I'll check that out. How do you mount them though -- they appear to be designed to plug into a port of some kind, rather than screwing in to a threaded port.
It has an o-ring to make it seal, but you need a stud or a bolt to keep it in place. To put it in a pipe it's best to weld a flat piece to the pipe and then drill the hole for the sensor and tap it for a bolt.
Old 06-15-2009, 10:51 PM
  #10  
RPHARRIS
Racer
 
RPHARRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I drilled and tapped a GM (delphi) open element sensor into the #1 runner of my intake manifold. You won't get quick response with one of these unless you make sure that you're getting air flowing THROUGH the element. If you just stick it on one of the ports the response will be very slow.
Old 01-22-2014, 07:08 PM
  #11  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
The NTC M8-F is most likely very good, but I would start with the Bosch 0 280 130 085 sensor. Commonly used to measure IAT in turbocharged engines.
I use it myself and I cannot read any lag in my datalogs.
What are you using to log temperatures?
Old 01-23-2014, 04:54 AM
  #12  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
What are you using to log temperatures?
Link G4.

Edit: I probably used a Link G3 back in 2009
Old 01-23-2014, 10:38 AM
  #13  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

check this thing out, don't think it has a logging output but itd be handy for real-time...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/110855301442



Quick Reply: Fast Response IAT for intercooler temps?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:02 AM.