Whats the most HP/TQ a 944 chassis can handle
#1
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
Whats the most HP/TQ a 944 chassis can handle
Just that.... how much HP and TQ do you think the 944 chassis/tub can withstand on a regular basis without twisting, cracking or bending?
I have seen some of you turbo guys up in the 500 hp range, and Tony G's LS1 is in the high 400's with monster V8 torque. Has anyone seen their chassis twisting or subframes cracking?
I have seen some of you turbo guys up in the 500 hp range, and Tony G's LS1 is in the high 400's with monster V8 torque. Has anyone seen their chassis twisting or subframes cracking?
#3
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
Haha, thats what I'm looking for.
My future plan is a 550hp 500ftlb LS2. I want to put in a roll bar with some legs running front and back for added support, but still....
How long before I have a 944 pretzel?
My future plan is a 550hp 500ftlb LS2. I want to put in a roll bar with some legs running front and back for added support, but still....
How long before I have a 944 pretzel?
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
are you talking about absolute preformance or long term stress cracks?
When it comes to absolute chassis performance its not really about HP but about cornering forces.
When it comes to absolute chassis performance its not really about HP but about cornering forces.
Trending Topics
#8
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
I'm asking because I want to be able to put another 100k miles on my car with 550 chp. My estimate is probably high, but I want to be sure. (I'm looking at around 450-475 wheel hp).
Its mostly a street car, but will see more than a few track days.
Turbo 600hp is different than V8 600hp. The v8 has much more torque, and makes power right now. A turbo builds power more smoothly...... in general.
Its mostly a street car, but will see more than a few track days.
Turbo 600hp is different than V8 600hp. The v8 has much more torque, and makes power right now. A turbo builds power more smoothly...... in general.
#9
Rennlist Member
It really is the wrong chassis for huge power. Aside from the unibody flexing you are still dealing with a semi trailing arm rear suspension, essentially the same as on the Vanagon. If you are going for the really big power you might want to look at the 928 platform. It is a much better starting point.
#11
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It really is the wrong chassis for huge power. Aside from the unibody flexing you are still dealing with a semi trailing arm rear suspension, essentially the same as on the Vanagon. If you are going for the really big power you might want to look at the 928 platform. It is a much better starting point.
#12
The application will dictate some of the answer. If you are running 600hp or whatever in street tire you have to worry much less than if you are at the strip on sticky slicks doing 5k launches or at the track cornering hard.
#14
as chris said if you drive hard there is more cornering load than power load .
the ransaxle will give out befor the chasis i don't think its a matter of chasis hanging together but if seems that beyond 500hp the standard trailing arm set up is a little inadequite
..
I would think development of a 944 would go sort of in this order
develop power up to 450hp then try to shed heaps of weight replace the rear sub frame then go for a stronger trans axle then go power crazy again
the ransaxle will give out befor the chasis i don't think its a matter of chasis hanging together but if seems that beyond 500hp the standard trailing arm set up is a little inadequite
..
I would think development of a 944 would go sort of in this order
develop power up to 450hp then try to shed heaps of weight replace the rear sub frame then go for a stronger trans axle then go power crazy again