Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

S2 LSD transmission install... First impressions... Second Impressions page 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2009, 07:17 PM
  #16  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
That sounds pretty fast in 4th Brian. Is that with a standard gearing 951 tranny?
Sure is.
Old 03-22-2009, 12:12 AM
  #17  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JET951
really Sid, I find it to be just about right for our tracks around sydney. Eastern creek straight is about 400m long coming out of the last corner in 3rd i end up about 5800-6200 in 5th before my braking zone....depending on how brave i am at the time.

Sean, S2 R&P or full S2 trans??? there is a difference in the 5th ratio.

I have dyno'd 145 at 7k and ran that fast in 4th with the 951 trans. The S2 trans to me is great up to ~125 but I don't really like to be powering into 5th at that speed. I guess that is my only problem with it.

My opinion is that a high HP car should stick with the turbo trans. The only reason I am running it is to get the car to feel better w/o having to run crazy boost . So far so good, I have only ran it up to 25 psi.

I won't run it in the other car though b/c I want to crank it up.
Old 03-22-2009, 12:22 AM
  #18  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Sid, both Sean and I have the S2 rp in the 951 tranny. It's generally great in most situations. It could use one extra gear for sure and perhaps 2nd could be a bit longer. That's why I'm thinking of going back to the stock r&p for the new engine, but we may as well try it like this for now.
Old 03-22-2009, 12:26 AM
  #19  
JET951
Drifting
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,642
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
Sean, S2 R&P or full S2 trans??? there is a difference in the 5th ratio.

I have dyno'd 145 at 7k and ran that fast in 4th with the 951 trans. The S2 trans to me is great up to ~125 but I don't really like to be powering into 5th at that speed. I guess that is my only problem with it.

My opinion is that a high HP car should stick with the turbo trans. The only reason I am running it is to get the car to feel better w/o having to run crazy boost . So far so good, I have only ran it up to 25 psi.

I won't run it in the other car though b/c I want to crank it up.
ah yes your right we are just using the S2 C&P in the turbo box. i forgot about that one. Patrick may need the turbo C&P back in once the his engine is finished over at PD.
im at the limit of my class at the moment, im allowed either 4 more kw or 10kgs less weight to stay in my class. so the S2 C&P is a benifit for me in that respect.
Old 03-22-2009, 12:31 AM
  #20  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I think that is why he is not troubled with it .
The 5th is .829 (turbo) vs .778 with the s2. The spread seems too far apart for me to like to shift hard into 5th. The RPM's seem to drop too much unless you are fully revved out in 4th. I typically will shift at 6500 and with this combo it drops too much for my liking in 5th.

I think Porsche got it right for high speed but not for around town driving. The best scenario I could see is a 6 spd with a taller R&P. That to me, would work as a good all around setup.
Old 03-22-2009, 01:02 AM
  #21  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
The best scenario I could see is a 6 spd with a taller R&P. That to me, would work as a good all around setup.
I agree, however I do like my 6-speed box a lot! 5th will still get you ~150mph, and the rpm drop to 6th is much better then the 5-speeds


-Rogue
Old 03-22-2009, 01:56 AM
  #22  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I really like the ratios Sean and I have up to approx. 300 to the wheels. Perhaps more but that's just dyno differences. If I could have a slightly longer 2nd gear in my current setup and a progressive 6th cog I'd be happy. I would say that I'll be hitting rev limit on our long straight with the new motor. We still have the GT2 up our sleeves but that will take a bit of work to fit. Nice option though and looking at those ratios with a high hp / tq motor, I think they look very nice Sean is probably a bit sick of working on my car for now so we'll leave this as is and see what we can come up with.
Old 03-22-2009, 02:05 AM
  #23  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think more about torque than power pat so i think the lower gearing of the S2 and 968 set ups are ideal for the2.5's but too short for a 3.0
Old 03-22-2009, 02:38 AM
  #24  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Yeah I agree but probably a bit of both in reality. Tq down low and hp up top. Thinking the shorter ratios might disadvantage both. As it is I love the quick shifting appeal of it now and I'm sure so does Sean. Guess it will be all relative with the incoming motor showing increase all across the board and therefore probably make the stock gearing feel fine.
Having said all that, I have had this tranny in a previous incarnation of the 3L and it was still fine. Never had it running at full bore though so that could be quite different.
Old 03-22-2009, 06:34 AM
  #25  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I managed to find two 083F ASW versions of S2 trans (thanks to wifes cousin Michael in Solothrun Switzerland). It has hardened 1st & 2nd. Fift gear is longer, 0.778 and final ratio is 3.875. Also differential is stronger than "plain" S2 trans have. Also LSD & cooling are there. This trans was a special order for Swiss market only option.
Old 03-22-2009, 08:44 AM
  #26  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

That sounds like yet another great pickup for you Olli. You are very resourceful.

Just to clarify. When you see a final drive ratio, is that an absolute? As in can you compare directly with another one? Does the ratio of the gears themselves not also have a direct bearing on all this? Is there a combination of the two? I don't think so but somehow it seems to me that if you use the two main examples from this thread being the ring and pinions from the stock 951 tranny (.829) and the S2 (.778) it still doesn't take into account different cog ratios. So do we just firstly look at the r&p when comparing gearboxes and then deal with the actual gear ratios?
Does this make sense?
Old 03-22-2009, 10:05 AM
  #27  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 93 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanR
will the car be ready for the club race? We will both be in the same class! (although you wiull have a 200lbs weigh advantage................ as well as skill)
I don't think my car will be ready for the LR race... I'll likely be driving a friend's SP1 car. So you'll be faster!!
Old 03-22-2009, 01:10 PM
  #28  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
That sounds like yet another great pickup for you Olli. You are very resourceful.

Just to clarify. When you see a final drive ratio, is that an absolute? As in can you compare directly with another one? Does the ratio of the gears themselves not also have a direct bearing on all this? Is there a combination of the two? I don't think so but somehow it seems to me that if you use the two main examples from this thread being the ring and pinions from the stock 951 tranny (.829) and the S2 (.778) it still doesn't take into account different cog ratios. So do we just firstly look at the r&p when comparing gearboxes and then deal with the actual gear ratios?
Does this make sense?
Pat the total final drive is calculated by multiplying the R&P X the overdrive.

so your final now is 3.212 and the turbo is 2.79.

Josh, it really goes to 150 in 5th??

WOW I am surprised, by the feel of it in 6th on the highway I wouldn't have expected.
Old 03-22-2009, 08:32 PM
  #29  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yeah, with a decent tire on the back (275/45ZR17 IIRC), it just makes 150mph in 5th. And much less rpm drop to 6th...
Old 03-23-2009, 12:47 AM
  #30  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ooo ge just noticed how silimar my thing will be ...i will be throwing my car together with a k27 and 968 box
ah 45 is that little taller tire is it ?
is that a GPS verified 150mph ?
and at what rpm ?
topped out 6th ? yet


Quick Reply: S2 LSD transmission install... First impressions... Second Impressions page 3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:36 AM.