Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

twin scroll setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2008 | 06:57 PM
  #16  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 4
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

No twin turbo even thought of.

Initially I decided to change the hotside to a T3 to cut down on spool time. I would have had to either modify my current unit again or get another. Then I found this small T4 but it's entrance is in different location than my current unit (current is "on center").

No matter what, I needed to modify so I thought why not try something else...Twin scroll ..it may give the best of both worlds w/o stepping up to a DBB unit. Plus Holset doesn't make a DBB that I know of and the Garretts I have used don't seem to hold up to really high boost . I don't feel like spending the $$ for a DBB and be dissapointed when it either, doesn't do what I want ,or breaks.

The "twin charge" comment is related to another project altogether using a supercharger and turbo together.
Old 11-09-2008 | 08:31 PM
  #17  
VOoDOoGTX's Avatar
VOoDOoGTX
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 0
From: New Paltz, NY
Default

i want to twin charge one of these :/
Old 11-09-2008 | 08:38 PM
  #18  
ShApE's Avatar
ShApE
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

make sure to use 2 wastegates and make sure to not join the pipes anywhere, other wise you have defeated the purpose of a twin scroll system. Also that last bend is pretty sharp but if should work fine.
Old 11-09-2008 | 08:45 PM
  #19  
bigdeano's Avatar
bigdeano
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default

My bad, took twin charged to mean twin turboCharged.
Old 11-09-2008 | 10:04 PM
  #20  
thingo's Avatar
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 9
From: Sydney Australia
Default

Nice to see someone doing this,I am using a twin scroll gt35 on my 968turbo project.You can get away with one wastegate I think but both pipes have to go to it,bit of a challenge for you.Not sure if that hotside is big enough, how do you calculate that is is the same as t3 .82?
Old 11-09-2008 | 10:21 PM
  #21  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 4
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

OMG how did I miss that project..WOW..

I really love the exhaust. I see the WG port is close to the flange. If I end up running off of both pipes I will most likely put it up there. IN the meantime I am going to tap just one pipe down low where the stock WG location is. I have seen twin scroll manifolds that have been configured both ways. Not sure how they compare.

Only time will tell. If I were running low boost I bet I would need to have both tubes tapped but I'm hoping that it will not creep with just one.

I am pretty sure that the T4 .48 is not too small. I currently use a .58 and it is way too big for street use.

I measured the entrance of both the .82 t3 and the .48 t4 to come to that conclusion for sizing.

Honestly I am hoping that it is smaller that the .82 t3 for spoolup puposes as this car will ultimately only be a 25 psi unit.
Old 11-09-2008 | 11:17 PM
  #22  
thingo's Avatar
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 9
From: Sydney Australia
Default

Well it is not ideal to only use half the cylinders to control the boost.

You will know pretty soon if the hotside is too small, it is a bit difficult to compare single and twin scroll sizes, not a lot of info(or options) out there, but general practice is that twin scroll should have a bigger a/r.I am using a 1.06 t3(the one in my avatar is an .82 t3), but time will tell if it is big enough, it should be comparable to .82t3 open.

Yea my project is a bit crazy...
Old 11-10-2008 | 04:10 AM
  #23  
gt37vgt's Avatar
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

I sujjest the WG hooked up to the hotside port closest to the turbo bearing housing these pulses will be see more turbine blade than the the ones in the other port .
so it would have more influence on turbine speeed than the other port
Old 11-10-2008 | 04:55 AM
  #24  
Duke's Avatar
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 18
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Default

Excellent work Sid!
Looking forward to the results. Twin scroll is really the way to go. I'm very keen on something similar myself but I just hate working around the steering..
Old 11-10-2008 | 11:05 AM
  #25  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 4
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
I sujjest the WG hooked up to the hotside port closest to the turbo bearing housing these pulses will be see more turbine blade than the the ones in the other port .
so it would have more influence on turbine speeed than the other port
Adam,

That's what I was thinking. I have also been thinking about using 2 smaller pipes that stay separate all the way to the WG flange. IE: having a piece of flat stock separating the 2 at the end with the pipes cut in 1/2 mated together

Thanks Duke, yea theh steering is a PIA
I will clean that up at some point but even though it has a sharp bend there the pipe size should allow for enough flow

The darn flange was sitting in my mailbox on saturday. Probably a good thing b/c I have a little more time to think on it
Old 11-10-2008 | 11:26 AM
  #26  
333pg333's Avatar
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 18,926
Likes: 99
From: Australia
Default

Just a thought. Would it not be possible to run a custom twin scroll housing that had one of those attached or internal wastegates, thereby negating all these other issues? I know that they're not meant to be as good but I'm not sure why? Internal w/g that is.
http://www.timsturbos.com/HX40_DSM.html
Old 11-10-2008 | 12:53 PM
  #27  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 4
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

That isn't a twin scroll just an internal WG

I haven't used an internal so I don't know how well they work.

Also the place where I pick my junk doesn't have any fancy stuff laying around
Old 11-10-2008 | 04:42 PM
  #28  
333pg333's Avatar
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 18,926
Likes: 99
From: Australia
Default

Yeah but that can be ordered in Twin Scroll housing and have internal w/g Sid. I just was really thinking about the concept of not having to find a place for a w/g in a twin crossover situ. More just an idea. Seems like ideally you would want 2 w/g, but then could they get out of sync? Therefore it just occurred to me while I was surfing around looking for something else that I saw that particular turbo.
You gotta go to a better standard of junkyard Sid.
Old 11-10-2008 | 07:12 PM
  #29  
gt37vgt's Avatar
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

the idea has merit as Integral gates are OK but they are only OK when the A/R is big enough.
PAT have have you seen these housings in GARRETT config?? as i believe them to be a Hitachi thing and not sure if compatible
Old 11-10-2008 | 07:57 PM
  #30  
thingo's Avatar
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 9
From: Sydney Australia
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
Adam,

That's what I was thinking. I have also been thinking about using 2 smaller pipes that stay separate all the way to the WG flange. IE: having a piece of flat stock separating the 2 at the end with the pipes cut in 1/2 mated together

Thanks Duke, yea theh steering is a PIA
I will clean that up at some point but even though it has a sharp bend there the pipe size should allow for enough flow
The two smaller pipes merging is how mine was done, it is very important to keep the pulses separate, all the way to the valve.Two wastegates is ideal but that takes up a lot of room.

I tell you it is more of a problem with the steering if you are rhd!


Quick Reply: twin scroll setup



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:08 AM.