Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Spare 2.5 L Engine - To stroke or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2007, 08:41 AM
  #1  
Douglas Sorrells
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Douglas Sorrells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Spare 2.5 L Engine - To stroke or not?

I have a spare 2.5L 951 enging with a brandnew Turbonetics Stage III Dry turbo. I'm thinking about tearing it down and starting fresh to build a somthing really reliable and strong. Thinking about stuff like: stroking it, knife edge crank, piston coatings, ect.

I've searched a bit and can't really find a clear discription of what's involved with building a stroker and what the power characterists are compared to a built non-stroked 2.5.

Any thoughs or idea would be great.

thanks

d
Old 12-16-2007, 10:44 AM
  #2  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Talk to David Floyd on here.
Is there anything wrong with the current or spare motor though? When you say you want something reliable and strong, not much can compete with a perfect stock motor with those in mind. Of course you can do all the mods and when done properly will be both reliable and more powerful. The operative being when done 'properly'. This often costs more than you're prepared for.
Old 12-16-2007, 12:22 PM
  #3  
tconn
Three Wheelin'
 
tconn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Call Scott Gomes "Under Pressure Perfomance"
He is a wealth of info. Has been building and racing these
cars from when they were new.
Old 12-16-2007, 08:51 PM
  #4  
hp18racer
Rennlist Member
 
hp18racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 868
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I did a 2.8, if I had it to do over I wouldn't have. Mine has a 968 crank, stock length Carillo rods and non-stock pistons to provide the needed offset. The moderate increase in displacement gives a corresponding modest change in power but really limits your options for inexpensive and proven chip/maf sets.
Old 12-16-2007, 11:31 PM
  #5  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hp18racer
I did a 2.8, if I had it to do over I wouldn't have. Mine has a 968 crank, stock length Carillo rods and non-stock pistons to provide the needed offset. The moderate increase in displacement gives a corresponding modest change in power but really limits your options for inexpensive and proven chip/maf sets.
I'm eager to know how the 2.8 feels compared to the 2.5 before/after. Also, if you could go back, would you have perhaps bored it instead? Or just kept it 2.5?
Old 12-17-2007, 11:27 AM
  #6  
tommo951
Burning Brakes
 
tommo951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you are seriosu about stroking it you won't get a cheaper way than this!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/PORSC...spagenameZWDVW

This kit enables you to use stock pistons too!
Old 12-17-2007, 03:46 PM
  #7  
hp18racer
Rennlist Member
 
hp18racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 868
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Not a big seat of the pants feel from the displacement change.

Cranking the boost from 13 up to 20, now THAT's a big seat of the pants change. At 20psi on street tires I can get wheel spin in 3rd gear at 5000 rpm :O The o-ringed head and Carillo rods to survive the boost were money well spent.

For me a well tuned 2.5 is better bang for the buck, if I had more money to spend I'd probably feel differently.
Old 12-17-2007, 05:43 PM
  #8  
Douglas Sorrells
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Douglas Sorrells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No there is Nothing wrong with the stock motor, but it would need to ccome apart and be cleaned up. I'm pretty sure some copper wire cuttings fell into the intake ports. I was just wondering what radical stuff I could do to this motor over the next 1.5 years that would make it really reliable and really bad *** & then drop it in down the road.

I was thinking that a 12+% displacement increase along with some lighened stuff (crank & flywheel) would make it pretty hot. But I really don't want to build a finicky race engine. But more of a bullett proof 400 hp motor capable of reliable daily driving.

Thanks for all input.

d
Old 12-17-2007, 05:51 PM
  #9  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

compression and maybe leak down to see were your at ?
get all the good bolt ons as there more cost effective than engine internals .
then if you still want to play motors start at the top with an NA cam cheap and effective then freshen the head up then look at the block



Quick Reply: Spare 2.5 L Engine - To stroke or not?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:07 PM.