Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Engineers: Why the upper diameter difference between block and head stud?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2007, 12:29 PM
  #1  
special tool
Banned
Thread Starter
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Engineers: Why the upper diameter difference between block and head stud?

Do we suspect that this is strictly to facilitate stud maintainance?

If you don't know what I am getting at, you ain't allowed on this thread..... j/k
Old 01-05-2007, 12:39 PM
  #2  
Jon Moeller
Three Wheelin'
 
Jon Moeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,544
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I need to re-read a couple of sections in Smith's "Nuts, Bolts, Fasteners and Plumbing", but my initial thought is that the space eliminates shear forces on the stud. The dowels at the top of the block that slot into the head are there to locate the head on the block along the plane created by the block deck. The space between the studs and the deck of the block ensures that the only load placed on the stud is through its length.

-Jon
Old 01-05-2007, 12:42 PM
  #3  
special tool
Banned
Thread Starter
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jon Moeller
I need to re-read a couple of sections in Smith's "Nuts, Bolts, Fasteners and Plumbing", but my initial thought is that the space eliminates shear forces on the stud. The dowels at the top of the block that slot into the head are there to locate the head on the block along the plane created by the block deck. The space between the studs and the deck of the block ensures that the only load placed on the stud is through its length. Bolts and studs are not intended to locate, only clamp.

-Jon
**** - yeah, wasn't thinking about shear.
Thanks for aiming me away from the "stupid" door.
Old 01-05-2007, 01:34 PM
  #4  
TRP951
Rennlist Member
 
TRP951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

interesting information I was wondering the same thing
Old 01-05-2007, 01:37 PM
  #5  
tedesco
Instructor
 
tedesco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it is also a result of the manufacturing process. If you look at the holes in the head more closely they are conical. Top diameter is bigger than bottom diameter (head gasket side). The hole are conic due to the casting process. Unfortunatly there are other conic holes in the bock as well (oil gallery) which might be part of the reason why somtimes peple get problems with rod bearings....
Old 01-05-2007, 01:49 PM
  #6  
Laust Pedersen
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Laust Pedersen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 1,357
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

It could also be space required for a deep threading tool needed to create the bottom threads (for the studs).
Old 01-05-2007, 01:50 PM
  #7  
Porsche-O-Phile
Banned
 
Porsche-O-Phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In self-imposed exile.
Posts: 14,072
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Interesting although I seriously have to wonder if the engineers would have been worried about the shear forces through all those studs. Total # of studs x cross-sectional area = a pretty significant amount of material - MORE than enough to pick up any induced shear stresses between block & head, at least one would hope!

Hell, I've seen steel framing connections relying ONLY on shear that use smaller cross-sectional areas to transfer hundreds or thousands of pounds. I'm wondering if there's really reason to be concerned about shear here - there ain't gonna' be all that much shear acting through those studs - probably a nearly negligable amount.

I'm still trying to think of a reason they would do it conically rather than cylindrically though. . .
Old 01-05-2007, 02:06 PM
  #8  
Laust Pedersen
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Laust Pedersen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 1,357
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porsche-O-Phile
...

I'm still trying to think of a reason they would do it conically rather than cylindrically though. . .
Conical holes is just the natural consequence of a casting process, which needs a certain slip angle (as the coolant area has).
Old 01-05-2007, 03:01 PM
  #9  
tedesco
Instructor
 
tedesco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

preventing shere forces is not the reason for increased hole diameters in the head. Even if there was a tight fit the holes in the block are even bigger and would still allow big movements. As mentioned the holes are conical due to the casting process and because casting is not one of the most precise processes the holes are simply a bit bigger. I think to remember something like 13mm at the gasket and close to 14mm at the top of the head.
Old 01-07-2007, 03:22 AM
  #10  
Driftomagnifico
Banned
 
Driftomagnifico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jon Moeller
I need to re-read a couple of sections in Smith's "Nuts, Bolts, Fasteners and Plumbing", but my initial thought is that the space eliminates shear forces on the stud. The dowels at the top of the block that slot into the head are there to locate the head on the block along the plane created by the block deck. The space between the studs and the deck of the block ensures that the only load placed on the stud is through its length.

-Jon
Under the situation where you have locational head lift the bolt is placed into a shear condition as the head deflects upwards relative to the rest of the clamped section. The shear load can be transmitted by the clamped section (since it is pinned), it doesn't have to contact the stud through migration. The Fv values are obviously within tolerance of the stud material, but the repeated duration of the load could lead to a stressing of the bolt.

In normal operation what you said sounds plenty reasonable.

I typically deal with wooden structures, so I'm not 100% up to speed on steel components.
Old 01-07-2007, 02:47 PM
  #11  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I think the real reason for the diameter difference is for the proper clamping forces required for the head. When you torque down the nuts, they pull on the studs putting them in tension. This "tension" is what holds the head in place to contain the explosions of combustion. Anyhow, for the proper amount of tension, the metal has to stretch a certain amount -- so the stud has to be long enough so the steel can safely stretch without reaching it's elastic limit. Once the proper length of the studs was calculated, they knew how far down in the block to put the threads.

Now, with the knowledge that the studs would stretch, care had to be taken to ensure the "stretching" part of the studs (the middle) wouldn't contact anything. Any rubbing with the wall of the hole would throw off the desired clapming force and hold the head down unevenly (this is also why we put a little oil on the head washers and threads of the head nuts).

So, the diameter of the hole is larger than the body of the stud. And this also aids in the manufacturing of the block -- the larger counter bore would allow a tap on a long shaft to go into the hole.

Just my $0.02
Old 01-07-2007, 04:05 PM
  #12  
JDeitz951
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
JDeitz951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey Shore
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...engineers.
Old 01-07-2007, 06:18 PM
  #13  
tommo951
Burning Brakes
 
tommo951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its there to confuse you Tool!!!!!
Those guys at Ingolstadt thought it would get you in the end!!

Originally Posted by special tool
Do we suspect that this is strictly to facilitate stud maintainance?

If you don't know what I am getting at, you ain't allowed on this thread..... j/k
Old 01-07-2007, 06:33 PM
  #14  
Darwantae951

 
Darwantae951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,034
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

What is sheer? I'm going to become an engineer and would like to gather as much info as I can before I begin classes in a year. Thanks!

-Darwin
Old 01-07-2007, 06:40 PM
  #15  
tommo951
Burning Brakes
 
tommo951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bonestock951S
What is sheer? I'm going to become an engineer and would like to gather as much info as I can before I begin classes in a year. Thanks!

-Darwin
Good question Darwin
Its the thickness of your girlfiends tights (pantyhose for the US boys)


Quick Reply: Engineers: Why the upper diameter difference between block and head stud?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:31 AM.