Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

944 V8 Race car for Sale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2007, 01:37 PM
  #31  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
I am glad to see that someone finally figure it out, 400rwhp in a v8 are not equal to 400rwhp in a 4 cyl turbo, you are correct, the 400rwhp on the turbo don't have any power, all those dyno sheets with 4cyl turbos showing 400rwhpo are fake, I have talked to a number of dyno operator that confesed to making up the numbers.
I agree with you. Even my dyno sheets are made in photoshop, lol.

There is nothing in this world comparable to the power of a v8 engine, turbo engines suck that's why nobody use them anymore because they are obsolete, the ls7 engine on the C6 is the most advanced engine in the world, I have heard rumors that ferrari, porsche, subaru and toyota were trying to buy ls7 engines for their entire fleet. Imagine the huge power of a Ls7 7.0L V8 engine producing an incredible 500hp, that my friend is technology, all those puny 4 cyl engines rated at 300-400 hp out a 2.L are junk.

JPR you are d'man, as a matter of fact I am going to buy me a v8, Oh damn I already own V8's. lol.

Hey anybody wants to buy a 951 with 350 fake rwhp?

Luis - you are being too rough on him. We all know that any 5.7 liter that can equal the power of a 2.5 liter is extraordinary.
Old 01-05-2007, 02:08 PM
  #32  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,444
Received 93 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

To prove what JPR has posted is true, I found a video of a amazing c5 vs a ****ty 951. The whole thing was staged, the C5 hit the brakes that's the only reason why the 951 was ahead. Like I tell my turbo friends, when I am driving my Mustang, my lug nuts have more torque than your engine.

http://www.forcedinduction.net/video..._and_18psi.mpg

Last edited by lart951; 01-05-2007 at 02:23 PM.
Old 01-05-2007, 02:10 PM
  #33  
EdC
Pro
 
EdC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victor New York
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OT: I kinda like that rear bumper cover from the Fiberworks site mentioned above.
Old 01-05-2007, 02:18 PM
  #34  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,044
Received 1,220 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

Lart,

lighten up. No one is bashing the 2.5l. The V8 conversions just give us another option and keeps the aftermarket manufacturing interests alive for us all.
Old 01-05-2007, 02:23 PM
  #35  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,444
Received 93 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
Lart,

lighten up. No one is bashing the 2.5l. The V8 conversions just give us another option and keeps the aftermarket manufacturing interests alive for us all.
Well, I am not attacking anybody, just reafirming JPR’s technical quote that 400rwhp on a v8 are not the same as 400rwhp in a 951.
Old 01-05-2007, 02:24 PM
  #36  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
Lart, lighten up. No one is bashing the 2.5l. The V8 conversions just give us another option and keeps the aftermarket manufacturing interests alive for us all.
Here, here!

Old 01-05-2007, 02:30 PM
  #37  
TRWright
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
TRWright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cool!
Old 01-05-2007, 02:35 PM
  #38  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tedwright
cool!
OMG, look who arised from the dead --->
Old 01-05-2007, 02:56 PM
  #39  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,444
Received 93 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RolexNJ
OMG, look who arised from the dead --->

is he out in parole?
Old 01-05-2007, 03:04 PM
  #40  
JPR
Racer
Thread Starter
 
JPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Miami, Fla.
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I’m glad you finally come the this realization on your own

Really, I’ve had 3 951 turbo engines before this one, from stock to fully knife edged, camed, vitesse turbo, maf, injectors, p&p head etc. And although they performed well, there is still no comparison to the V8 in terms of performance. I don't know how our cars run on a mod to mod versus all other brands (corvette, viper etc.) I don’t street race. But on the same car (my current one), I’ve had both engines, and that is what I base may conclusion on, not hearsay or videos. I’ve seen Flavios car on the track many times kick all but the best prepared full racers (including ferrari, viper, 911, and other fast 951's)not as much during cornering but down the straits and under acceleration out of turns.

I realize that the V8 is not your thing Lart and that’s ok. I was not much of a fan until I rode in a German Performance conversion and then got back into my 951. But don’t tell that a high hp 4cyl engine, which usually has a power curve that looks like the start of a roller coaster ride is the same as that of a V8 that give more than 70% of peak torque at 1400 rpm

In any case, enlightenment is good thing, no matter when it happens

Jpr

Originally Posted by lart951
I am glad to see that someone finally figure it out, 400rwhp in a v8 are not equal to 400rwhp in a 4 cyl turbo, you are correct, the 400rwhp on the turbo don't have any power, all those dyno sheets with 4cyl turbos showing 400rwhpo are fake, I have talked to a number of dyno operator that confesed to making up the numbers.
I agree with you. Even my dyno sheets are made in photoshop, lol.

There is nothing in this world comparable to the power of a v8 engine, turbo engines suck that's why nobody use them anymore because they are obsolete, the ls7 engine on the C6 is the most advanced engine in the world, I have heard rumors that ferrari, porsche, subaru and toyota were trying to buy ls7 engines for their entire fleet. Imagine the huge power of a Ls7 7.0L V8 engine producing an incredible 500hp, that my friend is technology, all those puny 4 cyl engines rated at 300-400 hp out a 2.L are junk.

JPR you are d'man, as a matter of fact I am going to buy me a v8, Oh damn I already own V8's. lol.

Hey anybody wants to buy a 951 with 350 fake rwhp?
Old 01-05-2007, 03:09 PM
  #41  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,444
Received 93 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPR
I’m glad you finally come the this realization on your own

Really, I’ve had 3 951 turbo engines before this one, from stock to fully knife edged, camed, vitesse turbo, maf, injectors, p&p head etc. And although they performed well, there is still no comparison to the V8 in terms of performance. I don't know how our cars run on a mod to mod versus all other brands (corvette, viper etc.) I don’t street race. But on the same car (my current one), I’ve had both engines, and that is what I base may conclusion on, not hearsay or videos. I’ve seen Flavios car on the track many times kick all but the best prepared full racers (including ferrari, viper, 911, and other fast 951's)not as much during cornering but down the straits and under acceleration out of turns.

I realize that the V8 is not your thing Lart and that’s ok. I was not much of a fan until I rode in a German Performance conversion and then got back into my 951. But don’t tell that a high hp 4cyl engine, which usually has a power curve that looks like the start of a roller coaster ride is the same as that of a V8 that give more than 70% of peak torque at 1400 rpm

In any case, enlightenment is good thing, no matter when it happens

Jpr

so when you had your modded 951 did you ever used the gears to find your optimal power band?
Old 01-05-2007, 03:10 PM
  #42  
DVC
Burning Brakes
 
DVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well said, JPR!
Old 01-05-2007, 03:12 PM
  #43  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JPR
I’ve seen Flavios car on the track many times kick all but the best prepared full racers (including ferrari, viper, 911, and other fast 951's)not as much during cornering but down the straits and under acceleration out of turns. Jpr
That is definately one monster of a car your friend has! I still would like to know who made the fenders though?

And I read that he beat those other cars, and that you owned several 951s too. But my friend watch out, for in 2007, there are going to be some pretty fast 951s like you've never seen, street cars that is. I would say as of now with a mere 2.5L, that Special Tool is still "Top Dog" on Rennlist with his 500 RWHP + car. So don't underestimate new technologies with our 951s, for we are evolving faster and faster.

Old 01-05-2007, 03:22 PM
  #44  
DVC
Burning Brakes
 
DVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Likewise, don't underestimate terms like "under the curve", pump gas, and low maintenance.
Old 01-05-2007, 03:26 PM
  #45  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DVC
Likewise, don't underestimate terms like "under the curve", pump gas, and low maintenance.
Thanks, I've owned several exotic high BHP N/As, but thanks for the tip.



Quick Reply: 944 V8 Race car for Sale



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:26 PM.