Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Scivision MAF kit Installation and initial impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2006, 02:54 PM
  #61  
Wormhole
Three Wheelin'
 
Wormhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,555
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you sell a non stealth version of the MAF kit, one that uses a cone filter, mounted around the headlight?
Old 02-22-2006, 03:04 AM
  #62  
RK951
Rennlist Member
 
RK951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 539
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by promax_motorsport
What I really want to do is have a programable interface to the KLR allowing boost levels to be set (as the DME scales the fuel automatcally based on boost and load / AFM signal) and also adapt the system to support a Dual Port Wastegate in a similar way that an EBC (such as a Greddy Profec or APEXi) does - but with the benefit or being integrated with the DME. An interesting concept, but achievable I think.
Is this something you are actually working on or are you just thinking out loud?
Old 02-22-2006, 07:02 AM
  #63  
tommye
Instructor
 
tommye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Andrew,
How about the throttle response of your MAF + DME/KLR chips ?
I don't mean turbo lag, but rather if you get boost with only partial throttle like with f.ex. the Vitesse chips ? With factory chips you need to completely floor it before you get any boost, this is not so pleasant.....

Cheers,
Tommy
Old 02-22-2006, 11:57 AM
  #64  
Mike S
Three Wheelin'
 
Mike S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you checked out your air/fuel ratio? I'm just curious how close it was right out of the box.
Old 02-22-2006, 12:25 PM
  #65  
cas951
Rennlist Member
 
cas951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Clara, Ca
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes I have. It's been right on the money with my stock AFM.
Old 02-22-2006, 03:42 PM
  #66  
black944 turbo
Rennlist Member
 
black944 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,261
Received 30 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Very cool, sounds like a nice system. The a/fs are what I was wondering about.
Old 02-22-2006, 09:50 PM
  #67  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RK951
Is this something you are actually working on or are you just thinking out loud?
Hi Rick,

This was me thinking out aloud, but we (ProMAX Motorsport) are currently looking at this if we can address the KLR pressure sensor limiation of 1.0 bar (should be possible). Controlling a DPW with the KLR should prove interesting too!

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-22-2006, 09:55 PM
  #68  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tommye
Andrew,
How about the throttle response of your MAF + DME/KLR chips ?
I don't mean turbo lag, but rather if you get boost with only partial throttle like with f.ex. the Vitesse chips ? With factory chips you need to completely floor it before you get any boost, this is not so pleasant.....

Cheers,
Tommy
Hi Tommy,

This is where this solution really scores. The throttle response is almost instant. Even partial throttle brings on the boost quickly as the cyling valve is switched by the KLR to function like a Boost Enhancer - the air signal is blocked from going to the wastegate until maximum boost approaches.

Throttle response and boost build up are further helped by the MAF not offering any restriction to the incoming air and the air metering being so accurate. Also at the top end, the boost does not fall away as with the standard car.

It's almost like driving with a DPW but with all the safety features of the factory electronic boost control.

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-22-2006, 09:59 PM
  #69  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black944 turbo
Very cool, sounds like a nice system. The a/fs are what I was wondering about.
Hi,

AFR will be maintained when running closed loop at 14.7 / lamda 1 when running with the MAF kit. At WOT, the AFR is then determined by the software only (if running manual boost control). Hence, it is only important to set the boost level at WOT according to the WOT map on the DME chip being used.

If using the MAF kit with the optional MAF optimised KLR/DME combination - the fuel is always scaled to suit the boost. This is the ideal set-up for all those standard 1986 model cars with a K26/6. Very easy additional power and no risk of running lean at maximum boost when hard on the gas.

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-22-2006, 10:01 PM
  #70  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wormhole
Do you sell a non stealth version of the MAF kit, one that uses a cone filter, mounted around the headlight?
Hi,

The MAF kit is designed to fit straight to the stock factory airbox. However, there is no reason why it can't work with a cone filter behind the headlight. At present we don't sell a kit in this format - however, if there was demand we would consider doing so. This would require a custom 'J' pipe and a filter that fits without interfering with the headlight stabiliser bracket.

Would anybody else be interested in this?

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-22-2006, 10:17 PM
  #71  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danny951
I have confirmed that you can get very high boost (over 20psi) with the stock turbo and stock wastegate (even not shimmed) by clamping the line to the wastegate. So, why do people say the stock wastegate cannot hold a high boost level? Isn't the reason that boost drops on a stock car because the KLR is programmed to open the wastegate at 5100 rpm (can't remember the exact RPM)? And tommye's right, the KLR has never really been "tapped into" to provide better boost control using the CV.
Hi Danny,

This is quite true - however when you clamp the wastegate line (or remove the banjo bolt and block the hole on the back of the IC pipe), there is no force acting on the wastegate diaphragm at all. The boost will go very high, but the wastegate would eventually be forced open by exhaust gas - especially if the spring was weak.

The standard wastegate has a fairly modest spring, so only moderate air pressure is required to open it. This makes it easy to control. A really tired wastegate could be used with no control and just the air pressure opening it (as with earlier 911 Turbo models).

If the wastegate is then shimmed, or the spring rate increased - using the same KLR program - more boost will result.

The problem is, the KLR has a pressure sensing limit of 1.0 bar, anything higher will result in the overboost program being invoked. This is why going the manual boost control route with a DPW is so attractive - as it is easy.

However, by using the KLR you can then program for boost gain, start boost and maximum boost. The KLR can only control the switching of a solenoid valve (the CV), hence it does not actually control absolute boost - it will only influence boost from a minimum and maximum point (determined by the wastegate spring with full pressure on the diaphragm and the KLR maximum boost tolerance).

Once we have worked out a way of allowing the KLR to sense boost beyond 1.0 bar (14.7 psi), I think we can then have all the benefits of a Dual Port Wastegate - i.e. high boost, rapid spool up but without the disadvantages (i.e. flat boost curve only and no adjustment for gain and roll off).

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-22-2006, 10:27 PM
  #72  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marcoturbo
Andrew, what are the main difference between the Guru chips you used to sell and the chips you currently sell ? Do they also come from Germany ?
Hi Mark,

Can't remember if I answered this - so forgive me if I'm repeating myself.

The MAF optmised KLR/DME chips are different as the KLR has been programmed as well to allow up to 1,0 bar of boost using standard factory electronic boost control. It requires the wastegate to be shimmed so that high boost can be achieved within the parameters of the KLR program and overboost protect value (on the DME EPROM).

The chips you have and the ProMAX chips that we now produce still use the cycling valve - but the overboost protect and knock detect functionality are disabled (there is temperature sensing ignition retard). Instead, the DME is optimised for a specific boost level and turbocharger delivery. ProMAX Level 1 and 2 chips support 1.0 bar boost, 1.2 bar and 1.2 bar flat boost line to maximum RPM. For the AFR to be correct at WOT - the boost needs to be set until the AFR reaches about 12:1.

With the MAF DME/KLR chips, the fuel will scale according to boost as the full factory functionality of the DME and KLR computers is retained.

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-23-2006, 11:20 AM
  #73  
Wormhole
Three Wheelin'
 
Wormhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,555
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi,
The MAF kit is designed to fit straight to the stock factory airbox. However, there is no reason why it can't work with a cone filter behind the headlight. At present we don't sell a kit in this format - however, if there was demand we would consider doing so. This would require a custom 'J' pipe and a filter that fits without interfering with the headlight stabiliser bracket.
Okay, what is the OD of the MAF inlet and outlet?
Thanks
Old 02-23-2006, 03:10 PM
  #74  
promax_motorsport
Racer
 
promax_motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wormhole
Okay, what is the OD of the MAF inlet and outlet?
Thanks
Hi,

The MAF is 3" internally 76.8mm and 80mm externally.

Regards,
Andrew
www.promaxmotorsport.com
Old 02-23-2006, 04:10 PM
  #75  
Transaxle
Instructor
 
Transaxle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tommye
The factory system uses the AFM signal to meter fuel delivery up to a certain limit - up to the point where the AFM door is fully open (which happens before max. rpm), from there on, only the rpm signal is used (maybe in conjunction with the WOT switch).

How about your system (MAF + chips), is this method retained or is the MAF signal used all the way to redline/max flow??? If yes, this would be a great advantage for having safe/correct fuelmix not only for a given max. boost level, but also for those who like to modify max. boost often......
The MAF kit delivers the same values as the AFM. It is a AFM since it measures the flow in m3/h instead of kg/h. The kit is completly compatible with the stock AFM.

The benefits of the kit are better response to the throttle,faster spool up of the turbo and nearly no restrictions to the airflow. That leads to higher boost at high rpms with the small K26 turbos.

In a KLR/CV controlled system it is important that the programming of both systems (DME&KLR) match each other. The MAF kit works great with stock chips. It works also great with our DME/KLR chips. In both cases without any adjustments. That may be necessary in a system with a MBC.

The chips reaches the limit of the KLR. With the 1.0 bar sensor in the KLR it is not possible to control higher boost. That is the reason for the development of an update for the KLR with a 1.5 bar sensor.


Quick Reply: Scivision MAF kit Installation and initial impressions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:40 AM.