well, well, well.....SLEDGEHAMMER mustang dyno results
06-20-2005, 06:53 PM
#32
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A suburb of Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
3 Posts
The 951 wedge likes straight aromatics - it is as simple as that.
I agree with you. I've used pump 100 racing, and used a 3 gallon tolulene mix per tank. My butt dyno can definately tell, that my motor prefers the tolulene (aromatics).
06-20-2005, 07:08 PM
#33
Drifting
476rwhp @ 15% loss would actually be 560hp not 546. You need to subtract from the crank number not add to the rw number. That's why it's a loss and not a gain.
Either way with the OE IC and intake that is damn impressive. It certainly beats my 462 rwhp with my buddies SCCA car!
I am about to start a new project and my have to give John's kit a try. Guess I need to call him...
Either way with the OE IC and intake that is damn impressive. It certainly beats my 462 rwhp with my buddies SCCA car!
I am about to start a new project and my have to give John's kit a try. Guess I need to call him...
06-20-2005, 07:31 PM
#35
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
ST, great numbers, but we are not done yet. A Cam designed to work with the head should yield few more ponies. The cam you have does not have enough lift. Of course the dyno will be the best indicator.
06-20-2005, 07:43 PM
#36
Banned
Thread Starter
Sounds good John.
Also - so everyone knows that these runs are wth the new sequential injection chip.
I MADE EXACTLY ZERO FUEL MODS TO THE SMT6 ANYWHERE EXCEPT 2 CELLS AT IDLE, JUST TO SWEETEN IT UP A LITTLE.
That is - the fueling and ignition on the 472 mustang run is 100% Vitesse, out of the box chip. Absolute truth.
Also - so everyone knows that these runs are wth the new sequential injection chip.
I MADE EXACTLY ZERO FUEL MODS TO THE SMT6 ANYWHERE EXCEPT 2 CELLS AT IDLE, JUST TO SWEETEN IT UP A LITTLE.
That is - the fueling and ignition on the 472 mustang run is 100% Vitesse, out of the box chip. Absolute truth.
06-20-2005, 07:48 PM
#38
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
James. that's 24 psi for sure? I remenber that you said something about some runs at 32psi is that true also?
06-20-2005, 07:51 PM
#39
Banned
Thread Starter
Max - Absolutely perfect.
In case it is not obvious - I am an obsessively meticulous nutcase who checks, rechecks, then checks things again to get a good result. So if I thought I could pick up 1/10 HP by a fuel adjustment, I would have. Wasn't/isn't necessary.
The new MAF/16 map chip combination picks up everything.
Oh yeah - it was 12.2 flat AFR today
Lart - I would never do high boost like that on a load dyno - no way. I don't even like reving to 6500 on that thing. It works the hell out of the car.
In case it is not obvious - I am an obsessively meticulous nutcase who checks, rechecks, then checks things again to get a good result. So if I thought I could pick up 1/10 HP by a fuel adjustment, I would have. Wasn't/isn't necessary.
The new MAF/16 map chip combination picks up everything.
Oh yeah - it was 12.2 flat AFR today
Lart - I would never do high boost like that on a load dyno - no way. I don't even like reving to 6500 on that thing. It works the hell out of the car.
06-20-2005, 08:00 PM
#41
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by special tool
Max - Absolutely perfect.
In case it is not obvious - I am an obsessively meticulous nutcase who checks, rechecks, then checks things again to get a good result. So if I thought I could pick up 1/10 HP by a fuel adjustment, I would have. Wasn't/isn't necessary.
The new MAF/16 map chip combination picks up everything.
Oh yeah - it was 12.2 flat AFR today
Lart - I would never do high boost like that on a load dyno - no way. I don't even like reving to 6500 on that thing. It works the hell out of the car.
In case it is not obvious - I am an obsessively meticulous nutcase who checks, rechecks, then checks things again to get a good result. So if I thought I could pick up 1/10 HP by a fuel adjustment, I would have. Wasn't/isn't necessary.
The new MAF/16 map chip combination picks up everything.
Oh yeah - it was 12.2 flat AFR today
Lart - I would never do high boost like that on a load dyno - no way. I don't even like reving to 6500 on that thing. It works the hell out of the car.
Also, since when is 24psi not high boost?!?!
Show us a 32psi run on the dynojet!
06-20-2005, 08:21 PM
#45
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Originally Posted by NZ951
John, stop pissing in my pocket and sell me a cam and head!
The head work is not cheap, but less expensive than what's out there, and it's proven. HP/TQ is what matters!