Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Lindsey Racing 3.0L 8V - Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2005, 08:45 PM
  #256  
porshhhh951
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
porshhhh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

can you? we would love to see it.


btw nice numbers again.
porshhhh951 is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 08:48 PM
  #257  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by porshhhh951
can you? we would love to see it.

btw nice numbers again.
Thanks but Im not going to stay on here all night on Rennlist. Going out. I am sure that certain people will rip apart my chart and say this is bad, this sucks. But hey, the numbers speak for themselves, and it's at only 18.5PSI. You can't please everyone, and honestly? I don't care? LOL. So as far as I am concerned, I'm very happy with the car and it's results.

RolexNJ is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 08:48 PM
  #258  
tconn
Three Wheelin'
 
tconn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Congrats those are incredible #'s.

What have you done to the drive train/suspension to handle all that power?
How much power can the transaxle handle before it becomes unreliable?
Just curious.
tconn is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 08:53 PM
  #259  
shaheed
Three Wheelin'
 
shaheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RolexNJ
So, why are my HP numbers higher? First, because it has to do with the sea level. While I don't know the exact sea level I'm at compared to Oklahoma City, I believe we're much closer than they are. It may be a lot too, but I'm not sure. Two, the air quality is much better here, despite all the bad things you hear about NJ - especially in the movies to!
someone more knowledgable feel free to correct me here, but since we're talking about SAE corrected numbers this should not make a big difference? and since this is a dynapack we're talking about flywheel numbers, not rear wheel right? (graph is labelled flywheel torque also) so that's still below 500rwhp? actually seems pretty close to your first dyno results? forgive me if i'm missing a critical detail here.
shaheed is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 08:54 PM
  #260  
porshhhh951
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
porshhhh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RolexNJ
Thanks but Im not going to stay on here all night on Rennlist. Going out. I am sure that certain people will rip apart my chart and say this is bad, this sucks. But hey, the numbers speak for themselves, and it's at only 18.5PSI. You can't please everyone, and honestly? I don't care? LOL. So as far as I am concerned, I'm very happy with the car and it's results.

as you should be.

dont worry everyone will always rip apart things. Its just curiousity. I had the same thing happen when I posted my dyno chart. Back then people still didnt think a 6 car was capable of 300hp.

Enjoy your new beast......I wouldnt let people stir you up. If you feel inclined to post it tomorrow...that would be cool. I would love to see a 15psi chart. I like to see as many charts as possible...im a footage *****. lol
porshhhh951 is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 08:55 PM
  #261  
porshhhh951
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
porshhhh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by shaheed
someone more knowledgable feel free to correct me here, but since we're talking about SAE corrected numbers this should not make a big difference? and since this is a dynapack we're talking about flywheel numbers, not rear wheel right? (graph is labelled flywheel torque also) so that's still below 500rwhp? actually seems pretty close to your first dyno results? forgive me if i'm missing a critical detail here.

interesting point. I guess we dont know. He would have to answer that.
porshhhh951 is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 08:57 PM
  #262  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by shaheed
someone more knowledgable feel free to correct me here, but since we're talking about SAE corrected numbers this should not make a big difference? and since this is a dynapack we're talking about flywheel numbers, not rear wheel right? (graph is labelled flywheel torque also) so that's still below 500rwhp? actually seems pretty close to your first dyno results? forgive me if i'm missing a critical detail here.
These are RWHP numbers, not at BHP.
RolexNJ is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 09:14 PM
  #263  
TRWright
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
TRWright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Congrats Robert! Now don't get yourself into any trouble with that beast!
TRWright is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 09:16 PM
  #264  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tedwright
Congrats Robert! Now don't get yourself into any trouble with that beast!
Thanks, and have fun being a new mod too! You will have your work cut out for ya pal!

RolexNJ is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 09:17 PM
  #265  
TRWright
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
TRWright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RolexNJ
Thanks, and have fun being a new mod too! You will have your work cut out for ya pal!

Oh, I am sure!!
TRWright is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 09:57 PM
  #266  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porshhhh951
interesting point. I guess we dont know. He would have to answer that.
Well, the chart actually says flywheel on it... As I noted before, I dont buy that 55lb injectors will flow 548WHP...
NZ951 is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 09:58 PM
  #267  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tedwright
Oh, I am sure!!
Hey congrates Teddy, glad you got it! Now I will send you my list of people to ban
NZ951 is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 10:03 PM
  #268  
warpedrotor
Advanced
 
warpedrotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default how is this posible on 55lb injectors

I would love to know because I coundn't do it 83lb injectors
warpedrotor is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 10:05 PM
  #269  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NZ951
Well, the chart actually says flywheel on it... As I noted before, I dont buy that 55lb injectors will flow 548WHP...
The chart also says SAE corrected, twice, did you miss that part NZ? Or only focus on what you wanted too? Plus, it did hit those numbers with 55 lbs. injectors, sorry to break your bubble.

Actually, you can call Lindsey and ask them yourself about the 461RWHP, and also, call the dyno shop I was at yesterday to veryfiy my 548RWHP - all of my "empirical data?" Would you like me to furnish you with all of that contact info too? I am more than happy to furnish it?

It's your call doubting Thomas...

RolexNJ is offline  
Old 07-15-2005, 10:10 PM
  #270  
shaheed
Three Wheelin'
 
shaheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RolexNJ
The chart also says SAE corrected, twice, did you miss that part NZ?
rob,
SAE correction usually refers to atmospheric conditions, not flywheel vs rear wheel. that's why i asked the question earlier about why the atmospheric conditions would make such a huge difference in an SAE corrected graph.
shaheed is offline  


Quick Reply: Lindsey Racing 3.0L 8V - Dyno Results



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:23 AM.