Lindsey Racing 3.0L 8V - Dyno Results
07-15-2005 | 10:12 PM
#271
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by shaheed
rob,
SAE correction usually refers to atmospheric conditions, not flywheel vs rear wheel. that's why i asked the question earlier about why the atmospheric conditions would make such a huge difference in an SAE corrected graph.
SAE correction usually refers to atmospheric conditions, not flywheel vs rear wheel. that's why i asked the question earlier about why the atmospheric conditions would make such a huge difference in an SAE corrected graph.
1.) Lindsey Racing - 877.943.3565 (ask for Mike or Dave)
2.) Powe-Teach - 973.586.3210 (ask for Brian, he did the work and the runs)
07-15-2005 | 10:19 PM
#273
Drifting
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 1
From: Round Hill, Virginia
Approx. 550 rwhp = to approx. 650 flywheel hp assuming 15% drivetrain loss
4 injectors @ 55lbs./hr.
0.60 BSFC - industry standard for turbo applications
90% duty cycle - possible but dangerous
This would require 165 psi on the fuel rail to make 650 hp with 4 55lb injectors.
BTW, I thought you were "going out".
4 injectors @ 55lbs./hr.
0.60 BSFC - industry standard for turbo applications
90% duty cycle - possible but dangerous
This would require 165 psi on the fuel rail to make 650 hp with 4 55lb injectors.
BTW, I thought you were "going out".
07-15-2005 | 10:22 PM
#274
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by RolexNJ
I encourage you to call both companies to verify the numbers:
1.) Lindsey Racing - 877.943.3565 (ask for Mike or Dave)
2.) Powe-Teach - 973.586.3210 (ask for Brian, he did the work and the runs)
1.) Lindsey Racing - 877.943.3565 (ask for Mike or Dave)
2.) Powe-Teach - 973.586.3210 (ask for Brian, he did the work and the runs)
07-15-2005 | 10:32 PM
#275
Drifting
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 1
From: Round Hill, Virginia
Engine I did as a comparison:
2.54l - 462 rwhp
4 injectors @ 82lb/hr.
0.60 BSFC
70% duty
55 psi on rail
Motec M400 standalone, Motec ignition expander, 4 Nippendenso coils, Garrett GT series turbo on 108 octane Sunoco. 1.4 bar boost.
2.54l - 462 rwhp
4 injectors @ 82lb/hr.
0.60 BSFC
70% duty
55 psi on rail
Motec M400 standalone, Motec ignition expander, 4 Nippendenso coils, Garrett GT series turbo on 108 octane Sunoco. 1.4 bar boost.
07-15-2005 | 11:10 PM
#278
Race Director
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,778
Likes: 5
From: New Zealand massive
Originally Posted by RolexNJ
The chart also says SAE corrected, twice, did you miss that part NZ? Or only focus on what you wanted too? Plus, it did hit those numbers with 55 lbs. injectors, sorry to break your bubble.
Actually, you can call Lindsey and ask them yourself about the 461RWHP, and also, call the dyno shop I was at yesterday to veryfiy my 548RWHP - all of my "empirical data?" Would you like me to furnish you with all of that contact info too? I am more than happy to furnish it?
It's your call doubting Thomas...
Actually, you can call Lindsey and ask them yourself about the 461RWHP, and also, call the dyno shop I was at yesterday to veryfiy my 548RWHP - all of my "empirical data?" Would you like me to furnish you with all of that contact info too? I am more than happy to furnish it?
It's your call doubting Thomas...
Can you furnish me with the AFR curves and boost charts???
07-15-2005 | 11:58 PM
#280
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 1
From: New York
Originally Posted by lart951
I am kind of confuse here so who has more power special tool or rolexnj?
07-16-2005 | 12:06 AM
#281
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by lart951
I am kind of confuse here so who has more power special tool or rolexnj?
07-16-2005 | 12:10 AM
#282
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,448
Likes: 94
From: California
Originally Posted by shaheed
well based on what's written on the graph i'd say special tool, but rolex is saying that what's written on the graph is not correct and it actually shows rear wheel hp. hell i'm confused too
$ 1000.00 on special tool.
07-16-2005 | 12:13 AM
#283
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by lart951
The power is the almost the same in both cars we need to have a race to find our who is D' Fastest?
$ 1000.00 on special tool.
$ 1000.00 on special tool.
Power is the same? Humm. 472 RWHP vs 540 RWHP? Sounds the same to me.
07-16-2005 | 12:21 AM
#285
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: GA
yeah but there's all other kinds of factors there: dynapack vs mustang dyno, rear wheel vs flywheel (yeah i know you said it's rear wheel, but the graph does say otherwise), the amount of torque that each respective engine is making and the shape of the curve. you guys need to have a good ole fashioned drag race....