Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Early spindels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2024, 12:26 AM
  #1  
Nitram T
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Nitram T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 43
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Early spindels

Hi guys,
I’m told that early front wheel spindels are prone to break under track use.

when did Porsche change to the better type spildles? What must be changed when swapping to the newer type spindles?

944 t 1986.

thanks.
Old 07-05-2024, 11:25 AM
  #2  
931guru
Rennlist Member
 
931guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,706
Received 316 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

There are two separate issues:

1) Square dash 944 and 924 cars use a physical speedometer cable that is routed through the left hand side spindle, and the hole in the spindle weakens it compared to the cars with solid spindles.

2) The early offset cars (including your 1986 951) had a less beefy spindle. The 87 and newer cars, including the NA and the Turbo cars, had a spindle approximately 10-25 percent larger diameter.

For track cars using sticky rubber and wider wheels and tires, the front and rear spindles and stub axles should be disassembled and magnafluxed before every track season. Failure can be life threatening at speed.

Last edited by 931guru; 07-05-2024 at 11:56 AM.
Old 07-05-2024, 11:40 AM
  #3  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,541
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

It’s certainly stronger and larger but not 25% larger.

Early outer bearing area (where they fail) is 19mm diameter. Late is 22. About 16% larger.

Inner bearing is 31.75 vs 35mm. About 10%.

You can put a 1987+ turbo spindle/hub on your 1986 951 no problem. It will bolt up to the strut and control arm ball joint. You will be limited in the amount of camber you can set though.
Old 07-05-2024, 01:38 PM
  #4  
Gage
Rennlist Member
 
Gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,576
Received 343 Likes on 279 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket

Early outer bearing area (where they fail) is 19mm diameter. Late is 22. About 16% larger.

Inner bearing is 31.75 vs 35mm. About 10%.
.
Is it the cross sectional area that is of greatest concern for strength or is it diameter or circumference?
The area calculations indicate increases of roughly 30% and 20% for outer and inner respectively.
Old 07-05-2024, 02:17 PM
  #5  
931guru
Rennlist Member
 
931guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,706
Received 316 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gage
Is it the cross sectional area that is of greatest concern for strength or is it diameter or circumference?
The area calculations indicate increases of roughly 30% and 20% for outer and inner respectively.
I am not an engineer.

I would guess that the strength improves with the cross section of the knuckle (i.e. the square of the diameter).

One of the areas where I saw failuires is the point of the stub axle where if narrows quickly to accomodate the nut. Stress cracks seem to emanate from the abrupt change in diameter (and cross section).
Old 07-05-2024, 03:05 PM
  #6  
Nitram T
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Nitram T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 43
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Will I be able to fit new spindels with the Old lower arms?

What about the offset is that changed?

in other words is it a direct swap or du I need to change other bits?

thanks.

Last edited by Nitram T; 07-05-2024 at 03:30 PM.
Old 07-05-2024, 05:15 PM
  #7  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,541
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nitram T
Will I be able to fit new spindels with the Old lower arms?

What about the offset is that changed?

in other words is it a direct swap or du I need to change other bits?

thanks.
yes new spindles fit old arms
offset on the front is determined by the arms. Old arms = old offset

direct swap (but you’ll need 87+ brake rotors)
Old 07-05-2024, 09:56 PM
  #8  
beamishnz
Rennlist Member
 
beamishnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 662
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
yes new spindles fit old arms
offset on the front is determined by the arms. Old arms = old offset

direct swap (but you’ll need 87+ brake rotors)
This is really interesting info... so on an early offset car if I run early off set front control arms (ex '86 turbo) I can use 951S spindles and hubs and brakes Iand early offset wheels) and there is no change to the early offset dimensions.... So just 100% upgrade with no down sides vs using the '86 turbo spindles and hubs and brakes... Is that right?
Old 07-06-2024, 01:23 AM
  #9  
Oddjob
Rennlist Member
 
Oddjob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Midwest - US
Posts: 4,650
Received 68 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 931guru
I am not an engineer.

I would guess that the strength improves with the cross section of the knuckle (i.e. the square of the diameter).

One of the areas where I saw failuires is the point of the stub axle where if narrows quickly to accomodate the nut. Stress cracks seem to emanate from the abrupt change in diameter (and cross section).
Yes, cross sectional area, lbs/in2
Old 07-06-2024, 09:47 AM
  #10  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,541
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beamishnz
This is really interesting info... so on an early offset car if I run early off set front control arms (ex '86 turbo) I can use 951S spindles and hubs and brakes Iand early offset wheels) and there is no change to the early offset dimensions.... So just 100% upgrade with no down sides vs using the '86 turbo spindles and hubs and brakes... Is that right?
other than the limited camber adjustment. The intended angle of the strut vs the spindle on -86 vs 87+ is a pretty stark difference but the eccentric bolt can compensate somewhat.
Old 07-06-2024, 04:06 PM
  #11  
Nitram T
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Nitram T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 43
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default







Can anyone please tell if this is a early or late style spindel?

Last edited by Nitram T; 07-06-2024 at 05:17 PM.
Old 07-06-2024, 05:26 PM
  #12  
beamishnz
Rennlist Member
 
beamishnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 662
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
other than the limited camber adjustment. The intended angle of the strut vs the spindle on -86 vs 87+ is a pretty stark difference but the eccentric bolt can compensate somewhat.
Thanks for that... Can't quite visualise that. I will need to get some out side by side...
Old 07-06-2024, 05:30 PM
  #13  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,541
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nitram T





Can anyone please tell if this is a early or late style spindel?
Early
Old 07-06-2024, 05:32 PM
  #14  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,541
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Some good info in this thread

https://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?p=236428
Old 07-06-2024, 06:54 PM
  #15  
Nitram T
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Nitram T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 43
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
Early
hmmm they are listed as 1988. Can anyone please post a picture of a late model. What am I looking for to tell the difference?

thanks.


Quick Reply: Early spindels



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:23 AM.