Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

knifed crank and lightened flywheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2004 | 12:40 AM
  #31  
J Chen's Avatar
J Chen
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: Taiwan
Default

Hi Tony,
Can I send you a PM ?
Old 01-05-2004 | 12:59 AM
  #32  
m42racer's Avatar
m42racer
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Default

David,

Yes sir, that would be correct.

BTW, lighter Pistons and Rods are coming.
Old 01-05-2004 | 02:25 AM
  #33  
NZ951's Avatar
NZ951
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,778
Likes: 5
From: New Zealand massive
Default

Hmmmm how much can a stock be reduced to safely?
Old 01-05-2004 | 01:26 PM
  #34  
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Does anyone actually have any HP data for lightened cranks? On chevy motors I've seen as much as a 5-10HP gain from 6,000 rpm on up.....but our motors don't spin that high and make less power, so I'm wondering if there's anything to be gained by lightening the crank.....other than a quicker reving car in neutral.
Old 01-05-2004 | 03:39 PM
  #35  
smokey's Avatar
smokey
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

I'd have to confirm it by calculation, but I think that knife edging the crank and lightening the flywheel have a negligible effect on power to the wheels. The only effect would be to reduce the moment of inertia of the crank and flywheel, but when the clutch is engaged, the moments of inertia of the transmission gears, the driveshaft, the ring and pinion, the cv joints, the driveshafts, and (especially) the wheels and tires would be so much greater than the reduction provided by the knife edging and the lightening as to make the difference negligible. At a steady rpm, the only way there could be a difference in horsepower would be through a reduction in crankshaft windage. The main reason for lightening the crankshaft and flywheel is to reduce shifting time, i.e. the time when no power is transmitted, which can have a measurable effect on both acceleration and lap times. That effect comes from having the horsepower available a higher proportion of the time, not from an increase in horsepower. Anyway, that's my view, and stand to be corrected by data or analysis. I have both a knife-edged crank and a lightened flywheel, and the difference on the track is noticeable, but not earth-shattering.
Old 01-05-2004 | 07:34 PM
  #36  
Tomas L's Avatar
Tomas L
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Boden, Sweden
Default

The wheels and tires have great inertia but remeber the gear ratio, in first gear they are geared down almost 12 times compared to the crankshaft. If you divide their moment of inertia with 12 then the number will definitely be much smaller than the moment of inertia of the flywheel. In fifth gear the gear ratio will be around 3 and then the effect of the wheel will probably be comparable with the effect of the flywheel.

If you do a stady state dyno test then any horsepower increase from a lightened crank will be because of reduced windage. Acceleration tests may show the reduced weigth as an horspower increase.

Tomas
Old 01-05-2004 | 07:55 PM
  #37  
TurboTommy's Avatar
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Tony and Tomas,

In my "climbing the hill" example, it seems I didn't clarify the parameters. Yes, indeed, I meant that there is no power left to accelerate up the hill!
I tried to imply that by saying basically that 'you're at full power in high gear approaching a fairly steep hill'. I should have been more accurate with my scenario.
Old 01-06-2004 | 10:17 AM
  #38  
smokey's Avatar
smokey
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Tomas L, very good points about the gear ratios. Hadn't thought of that. The simplest test would be comparing before and after times from standstill to redline in first gear.
Old 01-09-2004 | 11:13 AM
  #39  
David Floyd's Avatar
David Floyd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,109
Likes: 4
From: Tennessee
Default



Old 03-25-2010 | 06:33 PM
  #40  
Richgreenster's Avatar
Richgreenster
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 958
Likes: 1
From: Too far from the track!
Default

I know that this is an old thread but anyone who has ever done any form of cycling would call a BIG B.S. on a heaver flywheel not costing you energy (HP). Bikes do not have flywheels but they do have rotating masses (Wheels and Rims) and the lighter the rotating mass the faster you go with the same energy input. I do not want to argue that on a car it might be a small increase in HP but never the less. A lighter flywheel will give you more HP and better acceleration.
Old 03-25-2010 | 07:33 PM
  #41  
lee101315's Avatar
lee101315
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 1
From: Weehawken NJ
Default

I noticed my car was a bit faster in the lower gears with an aluminum flywheel.
This thread popped up just in time, I was actually debating whether or not to lighten my crankshaft (being that its out of the car)

Who here has a lightened crank?
Old 03-25-2010 | 07:52 PM
  #42  
Duke's Avatar
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 18
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by Richgreenster
I know that this is an old thread but anyone who has ever done any form of cycling would call a BIG B.S. on a heaver flywheel not costing you energy (HP). Bikes do not have flywheels but they do have rotating masses (Wheels and Rims) and the lighter the rotating mass the faster you go with the same energy input. I do not want to argue that on a car it might be a small increase in HP but never the less. A lighter flywheel will give you more HP and better acceleration.
It can never give or take power but it can affect acceleration.
It's the same with a bike, you apply the same power and you feel a difference between different wheels. The lighter wheel does not mean that you as the driving force produces more power.
Just wanted to straighten that up
Old 03-25-2010 | 08:04 PM
  #43  
Richgreenster's Avatar
Richgreenster
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 958
Likes: 1
From: Too far from the track!
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
It can never give or take power but it can affect acceleration.
It's the same with a bike, you apply the same power and you feel a difference between different wheels. The lighter wheel does not mean that you as the driving force produces more power.
Just wanted to straighten that up
I agree but the vehicle (car or bike) will go faster with the same power. The same way that lighter with the same power=faster. Is not faster what we are after not just HP?
Old 03-25-2010 | 08:11 PM
  #44  
V2Rocket's Avatar
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,597
Likes: 666
From: Nashville, TN
Default

somedays i wish i could have a heavier flywheel to make it smoother off the line..
Old 03-25-2010 | 08:14 PM
  #45  
95ONE's Avatar
95ONE
Race Car
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
somedays i wish i could have a heavier flywheel to make it smoother off the line..
Naw, you're just looking for a smoother driver.


Quick Reply: knifed crank and lightened flywheel?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:06 PM.