90GT Greg Brown Engine Build
#64
Pro
snip
The "before" number was the baseline from the tests with Greg's plenum project a couple of years ago, same dyno and same engine configuration except had no cats then. Max power was 321 (rw, SAE) but was cut off a bit early. The identical Dynojet that we usually use up here in Marysville put peak power (340) right at 6000 so I don't think there was much if anyhting missing there.
Attachment 1014813
Here's the video:
The "before" number was the baseline from the tests with Greg's plenum project a couple of years ago, same dyno and same engine configuration except had no cats then. Max power was 321 (rw, SAE) but was cut off a bit early. The identical Dynojet that we usually use up here in Marysville put peak power (340) right at 6000 so I don't think there was much if anyhting missing there.
Attachment 1014813
Here's the video:
My apologies Jim, but I'm puzzled re your rationale in reconciling the disparity between readings of two different dyno results, on what seems to me as being produced by the same car.
A difference of a couple of HP here and there would be easily be a comfortable margin of difference in instrument readings, but 10+ stuff ... arrhhh gee mate ... not so sure.
#66
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
My apologies Jim, but I'm puzzled re your rationale in reconciling the disparity between readings of two different dyno results, on what seems to me as being produced by the same car.
A difference of a couple of HP here and there would be easily be a comfortable margin of difference in instrument readings, but 10+ stuff ... arrhhh gee mate ... not so sure.
A difference of a couple of HP here and there would be easily be a comfortable margin of difference in instrument readings, but 10+ stuff ... arrhhh gee mate ... not so sure.
My point was simply that different dyno's produce different numbers, but that was not the case here.
#67
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Bullet mufflers got bought out by Magnaflow some years ago and those mufflers are no longer available, but do a nice job. It's too bad, they seem to flow well and are reasonably sedate when idling and cruising around town (and appropriately non-sedate with the throttle opened up).
#69
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes
on
36 Posts
What a very cool project and an awesome outcome! I'm sure it must be a blast to drive.
It's pretty amazing what kind of power you;re getting from the engine. Clearly the hardware has a lot to do with the results, but let;s not forget that Jim (and Sue) are MASTERs at tuning, and thing these cars. Jim probably has more hours with the sharktuner than anyone and get get a car into proper shape in just a couple hours or less. I guarantee there's more power there. Get some 93 octane gas, a little more tuning, and that car will make 400 WHP no problem.
Jim,
Regarding the tranny rebuild, did you or Greg touch the hardware side of the PSD? That the accumulator, but the actual clutch plates, etc on the tranny side? And if so, any difference?
It's pretty amazing what kind of power you;re getting from the engine. Clearly the hardware has a lot to do with the results, but let;s not forget that Jim (and Sue) are MASTERs at tuning, and thing these cars. Jim probably has more hours with the sharktuner than anyone and get get a car into proper shape in just a couple hours or less. I guarantee there's more power there. Get some 93 octane gas, a little more tuning, and that car will make 400 WHP no problem.
Jim,
Regarding the tranny rebuild, did you or Greg touch the hardware side of the PSD? That the accumulator, but the actual clutch plates, etc on the tranny side? And if so, any difference?
#70
Rennlist Member
The two sets of curves on that graph were the same car, same dyno, same operator, different engine config. My confidence is high that those are valid before/after comparisons.
My point was simply that different dyno's produce different numbers, but that was not the case here.
My point was simply that different dyno's produce different numbers, but that was not the case here.
again, if you run on two same dyno types and see different runs, its usually not the dyno.
the holbert car was run on every dyno from the bayarea to sacramento. (almost) and its runs were always 320rwhp +/- 1-2 hp. currently on the stroker, about 5 diff dynos and all are between 372 and 375rwhp. (not all 248e's either)
its simple..eitiher you accelerate the drums at the same rate or you dont. the dynos dont lie. correction factors can be off and played with , but just do an "actual " run and that is exactly what the car is doing.
#71
Rennlist Member
what is your take on the trade offs? (besides the obvious... cost, method, availabliltiy)
#73
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks to everyone for the kind words. This really has been a fun project.
Here's some more pics, assembly this time. First, the obligatory "art" shot:
Rods, ready for assembly:
Cosmic crank, waiting...
Pistons and rods:
All together:
Combustion-side view. (Note the added valve reliefs for the 968 pistons, to accommodate both banks):
Valve train assembled and cams getting dialed in:
Final assembly on the test-stand:
Finishing up topside connections:
And underneath also:
Here's some more pics, assembly this time. First, the obligatory "art" shot:
Rods, ready for assembly:
Cosmic crank, waiting...
Pistons and rods:
All together:
Combustion-side view. (Note the added valve reliefs for the 968 pistons, to accommodate both banks):
Valve train assembled and cams getting dialed in:
Final assembly on the test-stand:
Finishing up topside connections:
And underneath also:
#74
Rennlist Member
Jim,
The motor looks newer than when it came out of the factory 26 years ago. Presumably the good Doctor has the castings chemically/ultrasonically cleaned?
I rather suspect you now own one of the 10 best n/a 928 motors in the world - many congrats.
Any guesses as to what your original motor might have run to had you not intervened at this stage? Other than possibly the [suspect?] thrust bearing everything else seems as though it was in pretty good nick.
Just goes to show what intent and some $$'s can do. Interesting choice on the crank.
Rgds
Fred
The motor looks newer than when it came out of the factory 26 years ago. Presumably the good Doctor has the castings chemically/ultrasonically cleaned?
I rather suspect you now own one of the 10 best n/a 928 motors in the world - many congrats.
Any guesses as to what your original motor might have run to had you not intervened at this stage? Other than possibly the [suspect?] thrust bearing everything else seems as though it was in pretty good nick.
Just goes to show what intent and some $$'s can do. Interesting choice on the crank.
Rgds
Fred
#75
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas!
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Spectacular! I remember hearing the Zyclamarot car run with it's new Greg Brown engine ... you could tell what a beautiful piece of machinery just by the sound as Dan revved it up ...