Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

90GT Greg Brown Engine Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2016, 11:59 PM
  #61  
Chuck Schreiber
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Chuck Schreiber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plano, Tx.
Posts: 3,455
Received 126 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Awesome!!
Old 01-30-2016, 01:43 AM
  #62  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,067
Received 323 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
Was thinking the same; clutch, TT etc?
Yes, Greg's Carbon/Carbon clutch and original TT rebuilt a couple of years ago with Constantine's bearings.
Old 01-30-2016, 01:58 AM
  #63  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

^^^ thx Jim, so essentially a new drive train....may have to make that trip to see it in the flesh again
Old 01-30-2016, 02:38 AM
  #64  
UpFixenDerPorsche
Pro
 
UpFixenDerPorsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 607
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcorenman
snip

The "before" number was the baseline from the tests with Greg's plenum project a couple of years ago, same dyno and same engine configuration except had no cats then. Max power was 321 (rw, SAE) but was cut off a bit early. The identical Dynojet that we usually use up here in Marysville put peak power (340) right at 6000 so I don't think there was much if anyhting missing there.

Attachment 1014813

Here's the video:


My apologies Jim, but I'm puzzled re your rationale in reconciling the disparity between readings of two different dyno results, on what seems to me as being produced by the same car.

A difference of a couple of HP here and there would be easily be a comfortable margin of difference in instrument readings, but 10+ stuff ... arrhhh gee mate ... not so sure.
Old 01-30-2016, 09:01 AM
  #65  
Chuck Schreiber
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Chuck Schreiber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plano, Tx.
Posts: 3,455
Received 126 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Jim,
Maybe I missed it..
Do you have the Doc Brown brown exhaust as well?
Old 01-30-2016, 12:13 PM
  #66  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,067
Received 323 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UpFixenDerPorsche
My apologies Jim, but I'm puzzled re your rationale in reconciling the disparity between readings of two different dyno results, on what seems to me as being produced by the same car.

A difference of a couple of HP here and there would be easily be a comfortable margin of difference in instrument readings, but 10+ stuff ... arrhhh gee mate ... not so sure.
The two sets of curves on that graph were the same car, same dyno, same operator, different engine config. My confidence is high that those are valid before/after comparisons.

My point was simply that different dyno's produce different numbers, but that was not the case here.
Old 01-30-2016, 12:26 PM
  #67  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,067
Received 323 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Schreiber
Jim,
Maybe I missed it..
Do you have the Doc Brown brown exhaust as well?
No, the exhaust was built by Louie Ott for the previous owner, Devek L2 headers into a Louie-style crossover with dual 2.5" pipes. There is a Bullet brand muffler on either side of the tranny (where the factory resonators go), no rear muffler. I added cats about a year ago.

Bullet mufflers got bought out by Magnaflow some years ago and those mufflers are no longer available, but do a nice job. It's too bad, they seem to flow well and are reasonably sedate when idling and cruising around town (and appropriately non-sedate with the throttle opened up).
Old 01-30-2016, 12:52 PM
  #68  
Chuck Schreiber
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Chuck Schreiber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plano, Tx.
Posts: 3,455
Received 126 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Roger that.

Really nice setup!! 👍🏼👍🏼
Old 01-30-2016, 10:53 PM
  #69  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

What a very cool project and an awesome outcome! I'm sure it must be a blast to drive.

It's pretty amazing what kind of power you;re getting from the engine. Clearly the hardware has a lot to do with the results, but let;s not forget that Jim (and Sue) are MASTERs at tuning, and thing these cars. Jim probably has more hours with the sharktuner than anyone and get get a car into proper shape in just a couple hours or less. I guarantee there's more power there. Get some 93 octane gas, a little more tuning, and that car will make 400 WHP no problem.

Jim,
Regarding the tranny rebuild, did you or Greg touch the hardware side of the PSD? That the accumulator, but the actual clutch plates, etc on the tranny side? And if so, any difference?
Old 01-31-2016, 03:33 PM
  #70  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,953
Received 170 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcorenman
The two sets of curves on that graph were the same car, same dyno, same operator, different engine config. My confidence is high that those are valid before/after comparisons.

My point was simply that different dyno's produce different numbers, but that was not the case here.
actually, i havent found that to be the case. a dyno that is an inertia dyno, will always produce the same results. it has to...... the only difference is the car and how its "feeling". sometimes how its strapped down, air pressure in tires, and how you roll into the WOT run, can make a diff. you can see 10hp variance on the first couple of runs as temps stabilize, but after that they are mirror image, usually. then, if you could instantly beam the car to an other dyno and run it, it would be near the same. ive seen very little difference even going to a brake dyno.
again, if you run on two same dyno types and see different runs, its usually not the dyno.
the holbert car was run on every dyno from the bayarea to sacramento. (almost) and its runs were always 320rwhp +/- 1-2 hp. currently on the stroker, about 5 diff dynos and all are between 372 and 375rwhp. (not all 248e's either)

its simple..eitiher you accelerate the drums at the same rate or you dont. the dynos dont lie. correction factors can be off and played with , but just do an "actual " run and that is exactly what the car is doing.
Old 01-31-2016, 03:34 PM
  #71  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,953
Received 170 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Inventories are getting low. I build engines with Alusil bores and 968 pistons or Nicosil and custom pistons, depending on my goals for that particular engine. (There are pros and cons to either approach.)
what is your take on the trade offs? (besides the obvious... cost, method, availabliltiy)
Old 02-01-2016, 01:19 AM
  #72  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,067
Received 323 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
actually, i havent found that to be the case....
I don't have as much data, but it only takes one data point to demonstrate that not all Dynojets read the same. But in this case it was the same dyno, so the point is moot and will not be mentioned further.
Old 02-01-2016, 02:46 AM
  #73  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,067
Received 323 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Thanks to everyone for the kind words. This really has been a fun project.

Here's some more pics, assembly this time. First, the obligatory "art" shot:

Name:  IMG_3609.jpg
Views: 629
Size:  120.5 KB

Rods, ready for assembly:

Name:  DSCF3083.jpg
Views: 637
Size:  206.5 KB

Cosmic crank, waiting...

Name:  DSCF3086.jpg
Views: 669
Size:  230.7 KB

Pistons and rods:

Name:  DSCF3089.jpg
Views: 734
Size:  199.4 KB

All together:

Name:  DSCF3097.jpg
Views: 645
Size:  230.9 KB

Combustion-side view. (Note the added valve reliefs for the 968 pistons, to accommodate both banks):

Name:  DSCF3098.jpg
Views: 591
Size:  202.3 KB

Valve train assembled and cams getting dialed in:

Name:  DSCF3329.jpg
Views: 733
Size:  213.9 KB

Final assembly on the test-stand:

Name:  Corenman engine on test stand high angle from rear 12-20-15.jpg
Views: 863
Size:  269.2 KB

Finishing up topside connections:

Name:  IMG_7497.jpg
Views: 743
Size:  250.2 KB

And underneath also:

Name:  IMG_7503.jpg
Views: 679
Size:  271.9 KB
Old 02-01-2016, 03:55 AM
  #74  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,947
Received 771 Likes on 615 Posts
Default

Jim,

The motor looks newer than when it came out of the factory 26 years ago. Presumably the good Doctor has the castings chemically/ultrasonically cleaned?

I rather suspect you now own one of the 10 best n/a 928 motors in the world - many congrats.

Any guesses as to what your original motor might have run to had you not intervened at this stage? Other than possibly the [suspect?] thrust bearing everything else seems as though it was in pretty good nick.

Just goes to show what intent and some $$'s can do. Interesting choice on the crank.

Rgds

Fred
Old 02-01-2016, 11:22 AM
  #75  
Tom in Austin
Rennlist Member
 
Tom in Austin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas!
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Spectacular! I remember hearing the Zyclamarot car run with it's new Greg Brown engine ... you could tell what a beautiful piece of machinery just by the sound as Dan revved it up ...


Quick Reply: 90GT Greg Brown Engine Build



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:03 AM.