Best source for a reasonably-priced degree torque wrench ?
#17
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting discussion topic- but feel as though I am missing something here.
I understand the specified approach, I also understand there is concern that once the technique has been applied to a given head and studs two or three times then things may not bode well the next time it is applied but never really understood why.
Bolts are designed to be "torqued" to a given stress/strain level such that they retain their elasticity and can still operate successfully over a range of operating temperatures. Presumably there is some degree of creep expected and taken into consideration but as I am aware there is no specified "shelf life" on this concept.
This begs the question as to what is to be done when having to tighten a cylinder head on a 30 year old engine. My experience of this type of work is with British motorcycles- some bolt into cast iron barrels and some into alloy barrels, all of mine had alloy heads. I rarely used a torque wrench in those days and often only had cheapo box keys using copper gaskets that I reused after what I believe is known as "solution annealing" - this involved heating the gasket with a blow torch until it glowed reddish and then dump it in a bath of cold water- softens the copper. Never had a head gasket fail on me when doing this. British motorcycle cylinder heads generally had bolts rather than studs so that one could remove the heads with the engine still in the frame [headroom].
Just makes me wonder what is so different in a car engine and what is the real problem here? Earlier 928 motors used studs [I believe] and later models used bolts to permit head removal whilst still in the car[?].
Presumably the OP wants a torque wrench to comply with the WSM specified approach or are we saying that something over and above is required to monitor what is actually going on?
Trust the above relevant to the thread- just interested to learn what specifically to watch out for in future need.
Rgds
Fred
I understand the specified approach, I also understand there is concern that once the technique has been applied to a given head and studs two or three times then things may not bode well the next time it is applied but never really understood why.
Bolts are designed to be "torqued" to a given stress/strain level such that they retain their elasticity and can still operate successfully over a range of operating temperatures. Presumably there is some degree of creep expected and taken into consideration but as I am aware there is no specified "shelf life" on this concept.
This begs the question as to what is to be done when having to tighten a cylinder head on a 30 year old engine. My experience of this type of work is with British motorcycles- some bolt into cast iron barrels and some into alloy barrels, all of mine had alloy heads. I rarely used a torque wrench in those days and often only had cheapo box keys using copper gaskets that I reused after what I believe is known as "solution annealing" - this involved heating the gasket with a blow torch until it glowed reddish and then dump it in a bath of cold water- softens the copper. Never had a head gasket fail on me when doing this. British motorcycle cylinder heads generally had bolts rather than studs so that one could remove the heads with the engine still in the frame [headroom].
Just makes me wonder what is so different in a car engine and what is the real problem here? Earlier 928 motors used studs [I believe] and later models used bolts to permit head removal whilst still in the car[?].
Presumably the OP wants a torque wrench to comply with the WSM specified approach or are we saying that something over and above is required to monitor what is actually going on?
Trust the above relevant to the thread- just interested to learn what specifically to watch out for in future need.
Rgds
Fred
Cylinder heads are basically clamped in place by the tension of relatively long bolts or studs. The blocks and heads are aluminum in this case (different alloys) and secured by steel fasteners, all with differing coefficients of expansion. So the elastic nature of the bolts/studs is very much part of the equation. The tension must be high enough to properly clamp the head against combustion pressure over a wide temperature range, but not so high as to exceed the elastic limit of the fasteners. And it must be able to be properly reassembled by your average trained tech at the dealership.
The WSM, as updated over the years by the various Tech-Spec booklets and Tech Bulletins over the years, specify either torque or angular tightening-- but not both. In the early references an initial torquing to 20NM is specified, followed by two rounds of progressively higher torque values without regard to angle. In the later references the same initial torque is specified, but the subsequent tightening is by angle without regard to torque.
Clearly, if the goal is to tighten a fastener to a specified amount of stretch, then in theory either the tension (i.e. torque) or elongation (i.e. angle) can be measured. The torque represents the desired tension, the angle represents the desired amount of stretch. For a given set of bolts or studs, the relationship between tension and torque is known in theory, as is the elastic limit.
The problem with torque is friction: in practice a large fraction of the applied torque goes into friction of the threads, which subtracts from the torque that is related to tension. The WSM specifies "light machine oil". Grease the threads instead, or simply use anti-seize, and the tension goes way up for the same torque and the threads will fail. Similarly, if assembled with dry threads then more torque goes into friction and the tension on the fastener goes down. Used fasteners (with worn/polished threads) will likely behave differently from used ones. The differences are like 20-30%, non-trivial.
The problem with angle is that the relationship between tension and stretch for the fastener is a complete unknown, in practice. For new fasteners, at the factory, this was simple-- the engineers did some tests and told the assembly techs what to do. As Greg said, it is a different story now. Used parts may be new or old style (hopefully not mixed), may have been stressed beyond the yield point (overheated engine, anyone?), threads (male or female) may or may not be damaged, new parts may or may not meet the original spec.
So measuring both torque and angle is the only sensible way to know whether the parts are behaving as designed. If the torque falls off as the fastener is tightened then either the fastener is yielding or the threads are failing. If the torque gets high then the fastener is work-hardened and brittle, and the threads will fail before the angle is reached.
The Gear-Wrench angle wrench, and the Snap-On "TechAngle" wrenches referenced above are both perfect for this job. A "beam" wrench or the older Snap-On "Torqometer" wrenches will do the torque job, if you add some way to measure angle with sufficient accuracy. I bought a lightly-used Snap-On TechAngle (ATECH3FR250) on eBay a few years back for less than $300, a very nice tool.
Personally I would take a used Snap-On over a new anything for the same price, and good ones do come up on eBay with some frequency.
#18
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the 1/2" tech angle from Snap On. Was expensive and it works well with one caveat. It is susceptible to damage on the end where the batteries screw in. I am on my second one. You CANNOT hold the wrench except on the handhold. Don't let your hand overlap the end or you will end up breaking the battery connection and the wrench will turn off. A very weak point IMHO. I am trying to figure out a way to keep this from happening as it can if you just set it down and something bumps the cap on the end of the handle.
#19
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh, nice. Note sure what the small one would be good for:
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...d=381475080705
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...d=381475080705
#20
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Jim:
Just WOW. What a clear, concise, helpful description of the problem and solution.
Yours is one of the best posts I have ever read.... and given the depth and breadth of
expert information we see here regularly, that's saying a lot.
If you can explain something as subtle as this to an uneducated person such as myself, you
have really done something. Thank you so much. This is so helpful.
Just WOW. What a clear, concise, helpful description of the problem and solution.
Yours is one of the best posts I have ever read.... and given the depth and breadth of
expert information we see here regularly, that's saying a lot.
If you can explain something as subtle as this to an uneducated person such as myself, you
have really done something. Thank you so much. This is so helpful.
#21
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh, nice. Note sure what the small one would be good for:
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...d=381475080705
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...d=381475080705
They won't measure degrees.
The model number you want for degree measurement starts with A.. e.g. ATECH3FR250
#22
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
OK. Tech angle. Thank you
Last edited by BC; 11-28-2015 at 05:59 PM.
#23
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Fred,
....So measuring both torque and angle is the only sensible way to know whether the parts are behaving as designed. If the torque falls off as the fastener is tightened then either the fastener is yielding or the threads are failing. If the torque gets high then the fastener is work-hardened and brittle, and the threads will fail before the angle is reached.
...Personally I would take a used Snap-On over a new anything for the same price, and good ones do come up on eBay with some frequency.
....So measuring both torque and angle is the only sensible way to know whether the parts are behaving as designed. If the torque falls off as the fastener is tightened then either the fastener is yielding or the threads are failing. If the torque gets high then the fastener is work-hardened and brittle, and the threads will fail before the angle is reached.
...Personally I would take a used Snap-On over a new anything for the same price, and good ones do come up on eBay with some frequency.
Excellent post and thanks for taking the time and effort to prepare. The mechanics of course I fully understand - the bit I was "missing" was not really missing at all given your input.
As you rightly say we are given a torque value or a rotation value to work with but I have never seen a "target torque value" specified to reflect the expected value when the specified rotation is achieved. All one can say for sure is that as the item is wound in the torque should increase proportionately [Young's law] and in our [oil] business, the only approach we tend to use is controlled bolt stretch wherein a pre-tensioning device is applied to the studs, they are then stretched to the pre-determined amount [measured], the nut is then wound in and the tensioning device released so that the stud or bolt then takes the strain.
Clearly if the torque applied does not increase with the rotation then something is clearly wrong. My interest in this matter specifically applies to an incident I experienced some time ago on my 928. I have the 928 Motorsports lower frame brace fitted and that is attached to the inner most front bolts of the lower A arms. The kit has a longer bolt than stock to ensure the thread engagement is sound when the additional elements are introduced. I had to release this to work on the alternator and when refitting it I made the cardinal error of not checking the specified torque values as I was sure the correct value was 85 ft lbs which is quite reasonable for a bolt of that size. As with any controlled torque joint I usually do the initial tighten using my ratchet and then take another two or three steps, so for 85 ft lbs i would typically do something like 40 ft lbs, 60 ft lbs then finally 85 ft lbs. I was just past the 60 stage- presumably approaching 70 ft lbs and I could feel something was not right so I backed off and horror of horrors the rear bolts on the lower arm were 85ftlbs but the front ones were 50 ft lbs. I crapped razor blades when I realised my mistake! Fortunately it seemed as though I had stretched the bolt- whether I stretched the threads I was not sure but with a new bolt it seemed to torque OK at 50 ft lbs and no problem since.
So indeed I can see the value of having a dynamic torque readout. presumably the angle readout is zeroed and then the device measures the ratcheted increment applied. If I have a bolt that is controlled by rotation I put a spot of paint on it and carefully check the amount of degrees as these are usually specified in increments of 90 degrees. Had I had such a torque wrench at the time I would have seen the torque dropping off or plateauing earlier than I did so indeed I can see the value of such.
Lesson learnt- always check the specified torque no matter whether you think you know the correct value!
rgds
Fred
#24
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Don't waste ur $ on this one, it only lasted a few times for me, now won't switch modes when needed.
'm leaning toward this Eastwood product,
http://www.eastwood.com/digital-elec...Ea4aApV58P8HAQ
but at $99 wondering if it's too good to be true LOL...
I only use new studs or bolts, once you have had one stretch during assembly you learn it's not worth the time and $ saved trying to re-use torque yield bolts (S4) or Studs on the S3 and 16v).
Dave K
'm leaning toward this Eastwood product,
http://www.eastwood.com/digital-elec...Ea4aApV58P8HAQ
but at $99 wondering if it's too good to be true LOL...
I only use new studs or bolts, once you have had one stretch during assembly you learn it's not worth the time and $ saved trying to re-use torque yield bolts (S4) or Studs on the S3 and 16v).
Dave K
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,538
Received 1,677 Likes
on
1,087 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If anyone ends-up with one of these POS Snap-on electronic wrenches, the only way to make them last is to unscrew the end of the battery box after every use. The spring is so weak that it won't last if you don't.
For angle-torquing my 1/2" Gear Wrench is the go-to tool.
For my Christmas present I'm going to look-in to something Stahlwille.
#26
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Taking the Snapon techangle as an example, the 3/8" is 5-100 ft-lb and the 1/2" is 12.5-250 ft-lb. If you could only have 1 for automotive use, which would it be? Does the angle requirement tend to be for fasteners that require higher torque as well so the 1/2" would be the better bet?
#27
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great timing on this topic.
I am helping my friend start this company as he was the patent holder to a lot of the CDI (Consolidated Device Inc) and Snap On torque technologies and left SnapOn couple years ago. Currently, we're selling to Bosch, Tesla, Space X , OshKosh, Siemen, Schlumbeger, etch...... and growing.
These items will have 200-300 hrs of battery, 1% accuracy, angle and torque built-in. The SPA is professional version and the TA is consumer version. You can use your ratchet and turn these adaptors into pocket torque / angle tool. You can call and ask for special pricing letting them know that Peter on Rennlist/ Porsche 928 referred. We're still working on the ecommerce to allow buying online.
There I've disclosed my associations.
http://digitoolsolutions.com/products/
I am helping my friend start this company as he was the patent holder to a lot of the CDI (Consolidated Device Inc) and Snap On torque technologies and left SnapOn couple years ago. Currently, we're selling to Bosch, Tesla, Space X , OshKosh, Siemen, Schlumbeger, etch...... and growing.
These items will have 200-300 hrs of battery, 1% accuracy, angle and torque built-in. The SPA is professional version and the TA is consumer version. You can use your ratchet and turn these adaptors into pocket torque / angle tool. You can call and ask for special pricing letting them know that Peter on Rennlist/ Porsche 928 referred. We're still working on the ecommerce to allow buying online.
There I've disclosed my associations.
http://digitoolsolutions.com/products/
#28
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Taking the Snapon techangle as an example, the 3/8" is 5-100 ft-lb and the 1/2" is 12.5-250 ft-lb. If you could only have 1 for automotive use, which would it be? Does the angle requirement tend to be for fasteners that require higher torque as well so the 1/2" would be the better bet?
So unless you are contemplating an engine-rebuild (or just like tools) it is hard to justify the expense at all, over a good set of basic torque wrenches (e.g. 1/4, 3/8 and 1/2" click-type). But I think either a 3/8 or 1/2" would work for cylinder heads.
The other place I've run into angle-toque is front-axle bolts on Audi's, M14 bolts are 85 ft-lbs plus 180 deg, M16 140 ft-lbs plus 180 (one-time use bolts). Big numbers but arguably less critical than head bolts, and a 1/2" clicker and a big breaker-bar for the last 180 would do it. I used my 1/2" tech-angle and was happy to have it.
I've never had any trouble with it, but I've also never had occasion to use the battery-cap as a handle. I can see where that might happen but it has not been an issue for me.
I went with the 1/2" (250 ft-lbs) because
#29
Burning Brakes