Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

K & N magic trick

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2014, 03:44 PM
  #61  
marine928
Rennlist Member
 
marine928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kingwood/Humble
Posts: 662
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Also good point bureau13. " air is everything, everything is air..."
Old 08-26-2014, 12:39 AM
  #62  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,953
Received 170 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
Dyno's are not the way to test air flow.

Personal experience with my 928. Drag strip runs...stuck at 14.02...14.01.....14.02..... figured I'd throw the K&N on the car for the final run.... broke into the 13's (13.99) that run.... Never had oil on my maf wire... no issues with the engine for the entire time I ran the K&N. (I cleaned and oiled it regularly using a very light coating of oil).

Worked for me. Only issue I've had with the K&N was fitment to the air box...need to make sure it's seated all the way round.
but, you need to make sure they are oiled correctly and you are dynoing a heathy car. the difference is small, but still there is a distinct benefit for the KN.

Originally Posted by marine928
The main benefit is a constant volume of air that remains constant regardless of how hard you are getting on the throttle. Paper volume decreases if its has any dirt at all. Low rpm's probably negligent, high rpms and high constant rpms the K&N will benefit any engine. Gimmie air and lots of it...Hienrich "das boot"
paper is very restrictive. Ive measured the pressure loss on the stock filter,it is substantial.

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
Cool theory, but..is it reality in the 928?


Perhaps most OEM filters will flow more dirty than the engine will ever produce?


Waiting on what the K&N does that benefits the 928.


I mean, a 6.5L stroker on OEM filter making godzilla power numbers on OEM..


Oh ya..airplanes. K&N -vs- paper changes manifold pressure by exactly zero.
now, were you there for that test???? ive seen my share of them. one interesting thing, that YOU cant deny is the test conditions and the air box fit. most all tests run an air box with loose straps. or a bad fitting air filter. this allows the air under WOT, to leak around the edges pretty substantially.. so, the results that you are looking at , are ancedotal at best. I try to make sure all those variable are removed. there is some statisical significants to the dynos Ive run.... Ive seen 5hp diffeences. Ill go to the dyno this fall and do one test just for you ... the paper filter.

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
marine:

Ya..we all have, for 20yrs here.

No difference.

That's why Im asking you for what this does for a 928 that's quantifiable, because we have never found it.

Myself..ive seen no dyno losses over two years on an OEM filter on any of my cars.
again, ill go to the dyno with my car soon and do a test for you. paper vs KN.
Old 08-26-2014, 12:54 AM
  #63  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Wondered when you would show up.

You two K&N kids have a good hug out, ok?

Old 08-26-2014, 12:59 AM
  #64  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

"now, were you there for that test????"

I'm the ****ing pilot.

Yes, I was there.
Old 08-26-2014, 02:24 AM
  #65  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,974
Received 319 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

I see no reason to use a K&N in the 928 as the filter is so large compared to most other cars it really does not put very much restriction on the engine.

Most cars have a filter 1/3 the size of ours, that includes a lot of GM performance vehicles like the corvette.

Those cars can appreciate improved flow, but it does have the cost of more crap going through your engine so there is no real reason to use them in our cars besides bragging rights.

They do toast mafs like nobody's business because of the oilso they should never be used on a LH jet 928 as a $50 filter is a lot cheaper to replace than a +$400 maf.
Old 08-26-2014, 06:24 PM
  #66  
upstate bob
Racer
 
upstate bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well this turned out to be an entertaining thread. Since I don't race or drag I will continue to knock the dust off my old filter until the day I die. If you want minimum restriction at the strip: take out the filter. Since mine is a 79 I don't worry about a maf sensor. Love that old CIS. Keeps on tickin'. Hey, maybe I'll take her out tonight!
Old 08-26-2014, 06:59 PM
  #67  
17prospective buyer
Three Wheelin'
 
17prospective buyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singhampton, Ontario/London, Ontario
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Surface area gain is a good idea on many cars, but you don't need a K&N to do that.
Old 08-30-2014, 08:09 AM
  #68  
marine928
Rennlist Member
 
marine928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kingwood/Humble
Posts: 662
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Great Mark, keep us posted on your test results. Would be very interesting to introduce a small amount of air born dirt into each filter and see what the results are.
Old 08-30-2014, 08:37 AM
  #69  
Courtshark
Rennlist Member
 
Courtshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,941
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Sounds like we need myth busters to get in on the action.
Old 09-02-2014, 02:54 PM
  #70  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,953
Received 170 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

yep.... i look forward to doing the test again, under controlled conditions. I bet , as i mentioned earlier, NOONE took the time to look a the fitting of the filter in the air box. ive seen so many bad fits, where you can actuallly see gaps in the filter to air box. the KN, not so much. and even with that, i make a silicon seal to make sure it was a perfect fit. (silicon coating to air filter.. .... wait until almost dry and then assemble to air box and clamp.... this makes a nice seal).. before doing this, i saw .5" Hg pressure change for a leaky air box vs sealed! thats what most are seeing on the dyno if they are doing a test.

as far as MAF polution........... just oil the outside, not the inside and that solves that problem.




Quick Reply: K & N magic trick



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:22 AM.