Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Time to talk air conditioners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2012, 12:00 AM
  #16  
C4Scott
Instructor
 
C4Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default If AC working properly how well does it perform?

I'm also not converted on my 89 but did get it fully charged and tested with no stated leaks.

However, if it gets above 84 or so the AC can't keep the car cool enough. I also have the rearac blasting as well. With the temps hitting triple digits I can't even think of driving it sadly.

It my first summer with a 928 is this just something inherent to their old AC systems not meant for this heat? I know old air cooled 911s had crappynac but doesn't make sense for the 928 I thought.
Old 06-29-2012, 12:07 AM
  #17  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Clean the evap core. You likely need a new expansion valve and a few other parts too.
Old 06-29-2012, 04:09 PM
  #18  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/myths/volcano.html


Finally, Mt. Pinatubo did have an indirect effect because it emitted a large amount of aerosols, but it was short-lived. (Note that volcanic aerosols are tiny particles, not related in any way to consumer products called aerosols that have not used CFCs since the 1970s.) The aerosols essentially improved the efficiency of chlorine from CFCs, but they have already disappeared from the stratosphere. Thus, this temporary effect is not the root cause of ozone depletion.
Yeah, the most trusting source of information is our government. I always check there, first! Especially with the agency that "brought us" these laws.

They "sort of ignore" that Mt. Pinnatubo "continued emmisions" alone amount to 700 tons of Bromine and 10 tons of iodine....annually. That's the equivalent of 56,000,000 pounds of Chlorine.

And that is just one "natural source".

Don't drink the Koolaid.
Old 06-29-2012, 04:23 PM
  #19  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,444
Received 194 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

it's obvious you have contempt for the EPA ..but if you dig beneath the politics..you'll find scientists from all walks..all professions (engineers, geologists, chemists, physicists)....that do their job and do it well...try not to listen to Rush too much and drink that "Kool-Aid" too...

The research identifying CFC as a problem goes far beyond just the EPA and the science behind "climate change" is there too...take a look....I'm not going to go into a diatribe about anthropogenic effects...I'll stick to the topic at hand... Should I run R12..or R134 in the GT... believe it or not.. I'm planning on R-12...because that is what Porsche intended for my GT in 89...and I can still get it here locally (as well as off ebay)....so that is what goes in there
Old 06-29-2012, 04:57 PM
  #20  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C4Scott
I'm also not converted on my 89 but did get it fully charged and tested with no stated leaks.

However, if it gets above 84 or so the AC can't keep the car cool enough. I also have the rearac blasting as well. With the temps hitting triple digits I can't even think of driving it sadly.

It my first summer with a 928 is this just something inherent to their old AC systems not meant for this heat? I know old air cooled 911s had crappynac but doesn't make sense for the 928 I thought.
The AC system on the car is very robust, with excessive capacity designed in from the start. Porsche had previously enjoyed very limited success with factory AC on their air-cooled cars, and determined from the start that their luxo-GT car would have state-of-the-art climate control capability right from the beginning. If your car can't keep up at ambients greater than 84ºF, you still have a some hidden capacity you aren't using.

My car came to me 15 years ago, 22k on it, with a pile (note: bigger than a stack) of dealer receipts for AC services since new. "Evacuate system, charge, check for leaks, none found." Even without leaks, somehow it would puke a charge in a couple months. After a few of my own recharges, it was glaringly apparent that there might be a few small leaks. I bought an electronic leak detector and went after every connection. Plastic bag wrapped around the connection, sniffer probe in the bag, so it could detect leaks down into the grams-per-year range. There were a few connections that didn't leak. Since virtually every connection and hose had to be disassembled and resealed, it made sense to do all the connections. flush the system, flush the compressor, new R-134a-compatible drier and expansion valves, etc. Reloaded the system with the correct oil (polyolester) for R-134a, with consideration that it will also work with R12 if the R-134a performance is inadequate. Evacuated the system with my gonzo pump overnight, charged with R-134a, and never looked back. I add a can of R-134a every few years, to make up for losses through the compressor shaft seal when the car sits idle for extended periods. If I drive it and run the AC regularly (monthly or better), no need to add any refrigerant.

The rest of the system is functioning well, with the vacuum diaphragms replaced and a tight heater control valve. Cleaning the evaporator is on my summer projects list, more prophylactic than remedial as the system performs flawlessly.
Old 06-29-2012, 05:13 PM
  #21  
GeorgeM
Rennlist Member
 
GeorgeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,109
Received 109 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmpusfugit
Craig's list has multiple sources of R-12 Freon in this area for around $20 per 12oz can. Not real cheap but not a lot more than R-134 either....example http://houston.craigslist.org/pts/3091673670.html (no interest in this, shown only as an example, no intent to sell)
That's a pretty good price for cans. Agreed that the price has dropped a touch. Then there's always those that think it's gold and try to get $50/can.

I'm determined to keep mine on R12, and since I replaced my leaking rear evap, it appears to be holding. I even bought an R12 recirc machine on CL for $100 and the guy threw in 20lbs of R12 for an extra $40, so I'm set for a while.

If you intend to stay w/R12, recommend getting your MVAC 609 license so you won't have issues buying it.... $25 and you can take the test online.

Good luck.
Old 06-29-2012, 06:17 PM
  #22  
SQLGuy
Three Wheelin'
 
SQLGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
...try not to listen to Rush too much and drink that "Kool-Aid" too...
Hey! I'm listening to disc 3 of Different Stages right now, and it's good stuff. Just because some people don't like Geddy Lee's voice is no reason to go calling them anti-environmentalists and stuff...

;-)
Old 06-29-2012, 08:25 PM
  #23  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
it's obvious you have contempt for the EPA ..but if you dig beneath the politics..you'll find scientists from all walks..all professions (engineers, geologists, chemists, physicists)....that do their job and do it well...try not to listen to Rush too much and drink that "Kool-Aid" too...

The research identifying CFC as a problem goes far beyond just the EPA and the science behind "climate change" is there too...take a look....I'm not going to go into a diatribe about anthropogenic effects...I'll stick to the topic at hand... Should I run R12..or R134 in the GT... believe it or not.. I'm planning on R-12...because that is what Porsche intended for my GT in 89...and I can still get it here locally (as well as off ebay)....so that is what goes in there
My contempt does not start/stop with the EPA. I'm sure that there are great people working there that are very bright.

The political people that "control" those people are the problem.

Like probably the huge majority of Americans that actually work for themselves and are not "supported" by the wealth that we create (read government employees of any type and anyone that is collecting "socialistic dollars"), it is to the point where our contempt reaches out to all the agencies that are controlled by "politics".

We, simply put, have no more dollars left to "support" the "rest" of the country. The "gig" is over...they've finally wasted all the money that there is...or that there is ever going to be.

But enough politics. Back to the subject, at hand.

You will be much happier with R12 in your system that R134. Even with R12, the system's ability to properly cycle freon, on a hot day, is marginal.
Old 06-29-2012, 08:35 PM
  #24  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,444
Received 194 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Like probably the huge majority of Americans that actually work for themselves and are not "supported" by the wealth that we create.

You will be much happier with R12 in your system that R134. Even with R12, the system's ability to properly cycle freon, on a hot day, is marginal.
Interesting Greg...I thought I took public roads to your shop and used your public water supply when I got a drink and I'm guessing you are probably on the "grid" to get power to run your shop..... but yea..I guess you guys that work for yourself don't get much benefit from the taxes that are stolen from your wages..

Considering that it's already 110ish in Kansas....I hope the R12 will be somewhat up to the task..



Quick Reply: Time to talk air conditioners



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:05 PM.