Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Race 928 alignment-ride height thread!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2012, 04:35 PM
  #1  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default Race 928 alignment-ride height thread!!!

I figured it would be good to put all this data in one thread for easy reference.... Here is the data I have:

On Casper, running 275/645-18 (same as 275/35-18) all around on 18x10x65mm wheels my actual ride height is 95mm front and 140mm rear...the front is VERY LOW..but my suspension has full heim joints and can go lower than stock shock 928's.....For reference the Estate running stock bilsteins with -1.5 coils eibach springs was at 120mm front and 150mm rear

Alignment.....currently I am running LOTS of camber due to the low front height....I am at 3' in front, 2.5' in rear with zero toe all around...my caster is 4.5 & 4.9' and the thrust angle is near zero.... I have noticed excessive front tire wear on the INSIDE drivers side tire...which is odd considering Thunderhill only has 3 right turns vs 13 left? When I 1st checked it it was over 3.5' on the drivers front, which is now 3'....should be better.....

I know Kibort runs 110mm front & 135mm rear with 1.7' camber in front and a bit over 2' in rear....but he is on stock koni shocks....

My spring rates feel quite high....800+ front and probably 500 rear

What is your race-track 928 set at and why?
Attached Images   
Old 05-02-2012, 06:24 PM
  #2  
OBehave
Former Vendor
 
OBehave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Danbury,CT
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think this is a great idea as I have been playing with my 85 and now Hanson car. First thing though is the need to clarify the camber values you are using.
Your 3' and 2.5' rear are negative or positive camber? I will assume it to be negative as that is what is more favorable for racing but let's please be clear as to -3' or +3'.
as far as toe, you should make absolutely sure there is no play in the steering components and you would want a little toe in so when the car is moving forward the wheels tend to turn outwards just a little. So for instance by setting the toe to 0, when the car is driving forward it could actually give you a toe out of 1/16"-1/8" or more depending on the tightness in the steering joints.
Toe out wears ties on inside,toe in wears tires on outside. negative(-) canber wears tires on inside and positive (+) camber wears them on the outsides.
And massive wheel spin wears them evenly.
Old 05-02-2012, 10:27 PM
  #3  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Ed
Negative camber.......since its what you need.....

Interesting about toe out wearing tires on the inside....might be worth a slight toe in......I'll check how these tires wear....
Old 05-02-2012, 10:57 PM
  #4  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

This should be interesting......

I've always found alignment discussions, at the race track, very humorous. People end up running around making changes on their own car to what their buddy is running....without thinking about the differences, from car to car.

Almost impossible to compare camber readings...since the height of the car changes the positon you might be on any given "camber curve".

It is possible that a car with 2 degrees of negative camber with sits higher than a car with 3.5 degree of negative camber might actually have more negative camber when the suspension is compressed to the same height as the car with the higher camber reading!

Front toe is also very interesting on the 928. As the cars get lowered, the "angle" that the tie rods sit at gets really wacky. Under braking and acceleration, some very "nasty" things will be happening on a highly lowered vehicle. (The "bump steer" goes absolutely nuts!) These cars really need to have the springs removed and be run through a "toe" curve" to see what actually is happening.

Everything I've set up has some significant "changes" to this "curve". Until you do this, you will destroy front tires, on the inside....
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 05-02-2012, 11:12 PM
  #5  
ubercooper
Three Wheelin'
 
ubercooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NH
Posts: 1,959
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My weight dist is different, but here they are anyway

2600lbs
Konis
850 front springs
650 rear springs
928 SP sways full stiff
295 front tires
335 rear tires

For now...
120mm front
140mm rear
0 toe rear 1/16" toe in front
1.5 front camber
1.9 rear camber
Caster 4
Old 05-03-2012, 01:14 AM
  #6  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Brian,

With the car that low Greg has nailed it on the head.
You need to make some changes.
Make yourself a bumpsteer kit (not too difficult).

Also measure your tire temps inside out and middle. Adjust your camber based on this.
Run 1/16" of toe in on your car (front) and the same to zero on the rear.

If you cannot get your camber down to acceptable levels and you are running early suspension then replace your lower a-arms with later arm to achieve less camber.
Old 05-03-2012, 06:00 AM
  #7  
puyi
Racer
 
puyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Le Mans - France
Posts: 349
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

And remember, too much camber or too caster make the car more sensible to rolling. So you have to optimize these 2 factors.
Toe is only relative to understeer or oversteer. If the car understeer go toe in positive way and "vice-versa". The optimisation should be the heat of the tire. It is not relevant, Camber is even more important in that way but is really nothing compare to pressure tire adjustment. With slicks, the tire pressure has to be 2 kPa @ 85-95 °C. If your tire over heated, you should begin with more air in it, so if you have beginning the race session with 1.6 @ 20 C, lets go to 1.65 and so on until you get the good pressure and T°. The adjustement of Camber goes 2 ways. The first one is to make the car the more simple to drive. It is to make it neutral. Second, it influences tire pressure and T°, so if you simply learn about that, fisrt and second are not independant facts. Then it is always an optimization between to antagonist factors. If you change the brand of tire or even the type of tire in the same brand, all your adjustment has to be re done!

Puyi
Old 05-03-2012, 07:12 AM
  #8  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,915
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Not sure my car's height, but I have is pretty low. I focused on corner balancing more that height.
Camber runs -2.1 front and -2.5 rear. Front toe 1/16 out. Rear toe 0.
Springs are 900 front and 450 rear
We need someone to make some drop spindles to get rid of the silly control arm angles at the low height!
Old 05-03-2012, 03:00 PM
  #9  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
This should be interesting......

I've always found alignment discussions, at the race track, very humorous. People end up running around making changes on their own car to what their buddy is running....without thinking about the differences, from car to car.

Almost impossible to compare camber readings...since the height of the car changes the positon you might be on any given "camber curve".

It is possible that a car with 2 degrees of negative camber with sits higher than a car with 3.5 degree of negative camber might actually have more negative camber when the suspension is compressed to the same height as the car with the higher camber reading!

Front toe is also very interesting on the 928. As the cars get lowered, the "angle" that the tie rods sit at gets really wacky. Under braking and acceleration, some very "nasty" things will be happening on a highly lowered vehicle. (The "bump steer" goes absolutely nuts!) These cars really need to have the springs removed and be run through a "toe" curve" to see what actually is happening.

Everything I've set up has some significant "changes" to this "curve". Until you do this, you will destroy front tires, on the inside....

Great info from Doc as always......I will have to take some temp readings to see what is going on.....



Quick Reply: Race 928 alignment-ride height thread!!!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:55 AM.